Capitalism and the tragedy of the commons

IMAGE: Clker-Free-Vector-Images - Pixabay (CC0)

About six weeks ago I wrote about how a substantial number of Amazon employees, which has grown from 3,000 to 8,000, published an open letter to the company’s management demanding the creation of a serious corporate environmental action plan to include the fight against climate change into its strategy.

The company presented the proposal to its general meeting of shareholders, who rejected it. A ban on the sale of facial recognition technology to governments, another proposal supported by many employees and an issue that triggered concern among civil rights groups, was also rejected by Amazon shareholders.

These are important decisions that define the company and its role in society, and that have been rejected by shareholders whose only focus is increasing the company’s profits, regardless of how that’s done. These people have shares in Amazon and are willing to do anything and accept anything, even if it means the end of civilization, in order to maximize profits.

The case shows how our model of capitalism is now unsustainable: a classic example of the tragedy of the commons whereby a group of individuals, motivated only by personal interest and acting independently but rationally, end up destroying a limited shared resource although none of them, either as individuals or as a whole, consciously want to bring about that destruction.

If companies issue shares to third parties to raise financing, and the objective of those third parties is to maximize the income they obtain from those shares at any cost — and that, in effect, is the behavior encouraged by shareholders, analysts and the markets, — the implication is that there is no solution to the problems facing us, whether we are talking about the drift toward dystopian societies denied basic freedoms or toward an increasingly unequal distribution of resources or the end of humanity. It’s that simple: a distorted alignment of interests are making the system unsustainable and we are like rats racing to the cliff edge.

Everything indicates that companies that deprive their shareholders of voting rights or that choose not to go public and instead distribute their shares among their workforce are right: the market economy drives growth and is the essence of capitalism, but at the same time it generates unsustainable and uncontrollable behavior.

Understanding this is just a first step.


(En espa?ol, aquí)


要查看或添加评论,请登录

Enrique Dans的更多文章

  • El desastre del software y la automoción

    El desastre del software y la automoción

    GM se ve obligada a detener temporalmente las ventas de su Chevy Blazer EV después de detectar un sinnúmero de…

    11 条评论
  • El enésimo drama de la automoción tradicional: la interfaz

    El enésimo drama de la automoción tradicional: la interfaz

    Porsche acaba de anunciar que se une a toda la legión de empresas de automoción tradicionales y renuncia a tener una…

  • Poniendo a prueba a ChatGPT: consultores centauros o cyborgs

    Poniendo a prueba a ChatGPT: consultores centauros o cyborgs

    Un working paper de Harvard, ?Navigating the jagged technological frontier: field experimental evidence of the effects…

    12 条评论
  • Suscripciones, tramos… y spam

    Suscripciones, tramos… y spam

    Elon Musk confirma sus intenciones de convertir la antigua Twitter, ahora X, en un complejo entramado de suscripciones…

  • El código abierto y sus límites

    El código abierto y sus límites

    Sin duda, el código abierto es la forma más ventajosa de crear software: cuando un proyecto de software toma la forma…

  • La gran expansión china

    La gran expansión china

    El ranking de apps más descargadas en el mundo en iOS y Android para el mes de septiembre de 2023 elaborado por…

    1 条评论
  • Starlink y las torres de telefonía en el espacio

    Starlink y las torres de telefonía en el espacio

    Starlink remodela su página web y a?ade una oferta de internet, voz y datos para smartphones provistos de conectividad…

    3 条评论
  • La fotografía con trampa

    La fotografía con trampa

    La presentación de los nuevos smartphones de Google, Pixel 8 y Pixel 8 Pro, y fundamentalmente de las funcionalidades…

  • Las consecuencias de reprimir los procesos de innovación

    Las consecuencias de reprimir los procesos de innovación

    Mi columna de esta semana en Invertia se titula ?El mercado de trabajo y la innovación? (pdf), y previene sobre los…

  • We are on the verge of the most dangerous election in history

    We are on the verge of the most dangerous election in history

    In just a few days, on November 3rd, the US presidential elections will take place, the most dangerous in history, and…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了