Capitalism Is at a Crossroads: Now Tech Must Lead

Capitalism Is at a Crossroads: Now Tech Must Lead

Those of us in the technology and startup worlds have thrived in uncertainty, we actively seek out its risks and opportunities. The ground has always shifted beneath us?—?but the tremors are now tectonic. Even before the results of this extraordinary election, we could feel it building. In the past decade, our creations have aggregated power beyond our control?—?they have swayed elections, they have concentrated wealth, data, and leverage in the hands of the very few, and they have triggered market panics and social revolutions. Soon our technologies will unleash a wave of AI-driven automation, and with it the loss (or is it the creation?) of millions of jobs. The world now demands we take responsibility for the power we’ve acquired, and that we engage with society at a broader scale. Will we answer that call?

As technology companies acquired power, the leadership of our largest legacy companies?—?companies that came to dominance during the post war economic boom?—?can no longer ignore the shifts in nearly every aspect of their business: customers are demanding new experiences, employees are demanding their work ladders to a greater purpose than profit, partners are asking for new ways to work together, and competitors are redefining markets once thought stable. How will our largest companies manage the transition to a world reshaped by technology?

And more than anyone at present, our government and policy leaders are feeling the shift?—?citizens have rejected politics as usual, and they demand a new social and economic compact?—?but their questions far outstrip our leaders’ ability to find answers.

Will our 40-year march toward open markets be reversed? Will China and Mexico no longer be two of our largest trading partners? Will the US abandon the Paris accords, and fail to lead the world through what increasingly feels like a global climate crisis? Will our new approach to healthcare for all be abandoned? If so, for what, and how will we pay for it? Will our financial system be subject to draconian new regulations, or will it be left unfettered, doomed to potentially repeat the mistakes of the past? Will automation and AI destroy tens of millions of jobs?—?and if so, should laissez-faire be our response? How do we manage through the greatest period of income inequality since the dawn of capitalism? Do we legislate higher minimum wages, a universal basic income, or demand that our corporations repatriate both their labor and their capital?

Answers to these questions won’t come easily, but the only way to find them is to begin a conversation. Join us at the Shift Forum, where 400 of the best minds in business, technology, and government will come together for two days of focused, action-oriented dialog. It’s time for leaders across all sectors to learn how to partner and collaborate?—?the old narrative of “Us vs. Them” no longer serves us. Find out more here. Let’s start charting a path forward, together.

*And yes, scholarships and founder/nonprofit/government discounts are available!


Never more important than now given the choices we all need to make.

回复
CMA Santosh Singh (FCMA, AIII, BSc)

Associate Vice President at Bajaj Allianz Life

8 年

Technology will lead through automation but may create the menace if monitored by AI & not homosapiens

回复
James Jefferson

Consultant, Lawyer and Senior Advisor

8 年

An interesting article.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Battelle的更多文章

  • Can Google Win In AI Search?

    Can Google Win In AI Search?

    Two years ago I wrote a series of posts exploring the business model and interface implications of generative AI-based…

    1 条评论
  • Why Haven't AI Agents Happened Yet?

    Why Haven't AI Agents Happened Yet?

    Three months ago I published my annual predictions, and while I rarely revisit them in the middle of the year, I do…

    6 条评论
  • AI Hype: Bad Data Is Bad Data.

    AI Hype: Bad Data Is Bad Data.

    New data highlighted in Casey Newton's Platformer newsletter codifies what most of us have already assumed: AI chatbot…

    2 条评论
  • When Did Tech Stop Being Magical?

    When Did Tech Stop Being Magical?

    I’ve been pondering something for a while now, but have held off “thinking out loud” about it because I was worried I…

    25 条评论
  • What Are You Reading, and How?

    What Are You Reading, and How?

    Nearly every conversation I've had over the past month has involved some variation of this question: What are you…

    3 条评论
  • Tech Has Replaced Finance As Too Big Too Fail

    Tech Has Replaced Finance As Too Big Too Fail

    I opened my annual predictions last week by noting that the technology industry had leapfrogged finance as the most…

    2 条评论
  • 2025: The Year of the Big Tech Flex

    2025: The Year of the Big Tech Flex

    This isn't going to be a normal year. 2025 will be strange, frenetic, and full of surprises, particularly for those of…

    7 条评论
  • Grading My 2024 Predictions

    Grading My 2024 Predictions

    2024 is in the books, so it’s time to grade my own homework. One year ago I posted my 2024 predictions, fresh off a…

    3 条评论
  • Bluesky Is Getting Big. Does That Mean Advertising Is Coming? (Yep).

    Bluesky Is Getting Big. Does That Mean Advertising Is Coming? (Yep).

    I’ve been in the business of making new kinds of media companies, media platforms, and media technologies since before…

    2 条评论
  • Generative AI Won't Work ... Unless We Change Our Approach

    Generative AI Won't Work ... Unless We Change Our Approach

    Listen up, tech oligarchs; lend an ear, simpering brohanions. We’re doing this generative AI thing all wrong, and if…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了