Capitalism Can't Survive Without Militarism

This theory that capitalism can’t survive without militarism is one of the cornerstones of the Karl Marx theory of the capitalism. According to him the society is build in classes and in order for the superior bourgeoisie to survive and dominate it needs violence. War is waged to preserve the status quo of the political elite and the ruling class.

The whole meaning of the capitalist society is to exploit the majority for the benefit of the minority elite. It can’t be done without violence, even in peacetime, ruling class keeps its power through the violence system, police, court, prisons. This policy finds way through wars abroad, when the inner resources are not enough and when the ruling class is in danger. That is exactly what is happening with the Democratic political ruling elite in the USA.

In this sense the appearance of Trump, as a businessmen, not a politician, is an existential threat to the political elites. That is why Mrs. Cheney hates Trump so much. She belongs to the elite by birth, and imagine someone will interfere with her dominion. She is ready to switch parties but to stay in the elite.

But persevering the power usually goes through violence. And who holds the guns, defines the rules. That is why the elite was so scared by the tremendous amount of guns in the population. As the fathers of our Constitution stated, it is needed for your protection from the corrupt government.

In this stage of totally monopolized economy the only expansion of the elite can come from expansion abroad. They have taken already the resources locally and have monopolized the assets locally and globally. The expansion is further globalization that can’t be done without violence and war.

There are few stones that can turn their car and they will take them out with all the means they have. One of them is Trump. Looks like Trump, and recently Musk, were the only influential people who proposed peace in Ukraine.

The propaganda doesn’t tell you the whole story. It is going a military conflict in Ukraine for dominion and spheres of interests between the west and the east. Who is going to rule the world and define the rules. As I stated before many times, who holds the gun, defines the rules. But what is not told in the media, there are killed people, thousands of people, from the very best genetic material. Did you notice that most of the bloodiest last world wars have been between white people? ?I am wondering recently, is the white race doomed to extinguish. In the USA it is not any more the majority as it used to be. In Europe after the last immigration wave, the demographics is changing rapidly too. And the whites are the race giving the least births. But this is another matter. I will return later on it.

We can’t defeat the violence without defeating the system, the capitalist system and their institutions. In this sense that the war is the continuation of the capitalist system we see in the conflict in Ukraine, the war strengthens the ruling elites. After all the sanctions from the west, Putin became more influential and powerful. Did you hear the name Putin so often before. NO. Now he is in the central media every day, in military parades, annexations and so on. What was the purpose of the west, to collapse Russia? It is not going to happen. First, because historically speaking Russia never lost any war. Second, Russia holds the guns. It has in its military arsenal gigantic amount of contemporary weapons, we haven’t heard about, and don’t know their names. Because while the elites in the USA were producing attorneys, Russians were producing engineers. In the USA an engineer is a dirty word, as it happened with me in the court in New York recently, when the prosecutor tried to humiliate my husband for being an engineer, and used his power as lawyer of the USA to violate his civil rights just because we are not lawyers, and because we speak Russian.

Or was it the purpose to collapse the Putin regime? I doubt. No. On the contrary, the west cemented his power and gave him a reason to use his weapons and experiment new military capabilities. Actually what is the purpose of changing the regime in Moscow? Putin is the most moderate politician in Moscow. If he was not there we would have experienced the catastrophe of the nuclear war sooner than expected, because most of his advisors are pushing for more serious military use. Use of the other strategic and tactical weapons, and weapons of mass destruction.

Western media and politicians now are playing with the fire, exploiting the patience of the Russian leader.?But they are talking only about nuclear weapons and capabilities. There are thousands of other weapons in Russian disposal, we haven’t heard of even, most deadly than you think even. Have you heard about the conflict in 70ies when China evaded the USSR (Russia)? Have you heard that millions of Chinese troops have been evaporated with laser weapons and no even a trace of bones was left on the ground? We are talking about millions of soldiers. And not many have heard about the broken diplomatic relations between China and Russia for 20 years after the incident. These kinds of weapons exist and have been experimented before.

What about the biochemical weapons, the ones like the Coved virus. It was man made in a laboratory, but couldn’t serve the globalist purposes effectively enough, and now have to be imagined some other threats.

Or the one like Poseidon weapon, the gigantic water wave from the ocean capable to wipe out the whole continent. It is not necessary to be nuclear to eliminate the population.

It has to be very clear. Putin very clearly said that in Ukraine they are having a military operation. If Russia launches a war, it is going to be against the USA, not against Ukraine. And if someone is still thinking that the nuclear weapons will be used against Ukraine or Europe is now miscalculating.

Our only option in these circumstances is de-escalation. Otherwise the consequences could be catastrophic are irreversible.