Can’t Find A Mentor? Try My ‘Rule Of 10’ Instead

Can’t Find A Mentor? Try My ‘Rule Of 10’ Instead

Welcome to my LinkedIn newsletter! In each issue of Entrepreneurship and Leadership, I'll be sharing my thoughts on scaling, leading and funding high-growth startups and what the future of innovation looks like. Subscribe?here ?to stay updated.

When I was in my late twenties, I started my first company — one that would ultimately grow into a tech unicorn, with hundreds of employees and hundreds of millions in annual sales. But long before any of that, I had to reckon with an existential challenge: I didn't know what I was doing.?

As an engineer turned first-time entrepreneur, I had serious holes in my skill set. I desperately needed a mentor, but as a recent immigrant and an unproven founder, my options were limited.

The success of my company was riding on the speed and quality of my decisions regarding everything from development to sales and distribution, but I didn’t have that trusted someone to turn to for guidance, so I came up with a different strategy. I call it my Rule of 10.?

The premise is simple: ask 10 intelligent people with different perspectives and levels of experience to weigh in on your problem, then leverage their collective wisdom to develop innovative solutions. As I’ve grown as a leader, I find I don’t need to ask quite so many people to develop the expertise I’m seeking, but the principles remain the same.

This approach was vital in building back-to-back unicorns — but it can work for leaders at every level, from solopreneurs to enterprise.

Here’s why I use the Rule of 10 and how it works.?

No alt text provided for this image

The limits of traditional mentorship

As a first-time entrepreneur launching a small company, I couldn’t just call up the foremost experts on AI or marketing and get them to mentor me. Even now, when so many more doors are open to me, it’s still challenging to find one person who can answer all my pressing questions. I’m not alone.

Just over half the respondents in one recent survey said they’d never had a mentor. Of those who had, only 14% secured the relationship by asking. The fact is, it’s tough to convince another person to invest so heavily in your success. Even if you do find a mentor, it’s unlikely that one person can possess all the knowledge you need.

Perhaps that’s why mentoring tends to yield only modest benefits , even under the best circumstances. Additionally, those relationships can quickly stagnate or fall apart. Personal advisory boards , a popular alternative where professionals curate their own “panel” of advisors, are intended to generate more robust and valuable feedback. But they come with downsides like scheduling conflicts and conflicting opinions. Not to mention, if one mentor is hard to find, a whole panel is even tougher.

But there is an alternative. Rather than seeking out a fixed mentor relationship — with all the demands on time and energy that entails — think more like a researcher or investigative journalist. Clearly identify your problem. Then focus on queuing up short, focused conversations to gain needed insight, fast.?

10 brains are better than one

For example, when I was building my first company, AppDynamics, I wasn’t sure how to price our products — so I started asking around. I talked with sales specialists who filled me in on the standard options. I ran those options past product folks. I folded in their input when I spoke with current and former CEOs of other companies. I ran my ideas past an engineer to get feedback from an astute and invested outsider.

By the time I had talked with 10 informed people — give or take — I had a holistic perspective on the issue and was able to reach the right decision. Of course, my approach here isn’t radically new — leaders who don’t make informed decisions don’t tend to stick around for very long — but it does systematize a useful practice and ensure I’m considering every important angle.?

One of my favorite things about the Rule of 10 is that it’s iterative. You’re not seeking a majority opinion but surfacing ideas and insight from each conversation until you have a complete understanding of the options. Each step of bringing what you learn to the next person helps clarify your thinking and provides a feedback loop. As you continue down this knowledge spiral you become — if not an expert — then at least highly competent on topics you once knew little about.

There’s another key virtue: the Rule of 10 actually encourages innovation. Rather than repeating what’s worked before, I can build new ways of doing things by crowdsourcing information tailored to my specific situation. Not to mention, it’s also an exceptionally efficient way to get up to speed. Done right, this approach condenses a lifetime of learning into a few focused conversations.?

No alt text provided for this image

A few rules for following the Rule of 10

Of course, you can’t just choose 10 random people and hope they’ll magically lead you to the correct answers. The Rule of 10 requires thoughtful consideration of who you approach and how you do it.

First, look for a broad base — a mix of insiders and outsiders, newcomers with fresh perspectives, and seasoned pros with subject matter experience. You may find them in places you would not generally think of — front-line employees, academics, job applicants, family members, or friends. My only rule is that the people I ask are generally smarter than me.

When asking for their insight, be respectful of their time by keeping to agreed-upon time limits and doing your homework first so you can immediately get down to meatier questions. This is especially true for subject matter experts who get a lot of requests for their insight. Often, I save those conversations for last, after I’ve built up a good understanding of the basics so we can have a two-way discussion with both parties gaining valuable information.?

When you start hearing the same concepts repeated or realize you now know more than some of the people you are interviewing, you’re ready to take action.

Using the Rule of 10 can be an intellectually humbling experience. It’s not always easy playing the student when you’re supposed to be in charge. But the job of leaders is to make good decisions, and you can’t do that in a vacuum. I still don’t always make the right call, but the Rule of 10 has taken me from a 50% success rate to about 80%, and I never stop learning as I go.?

Thank you for reading! I'd love to know your thoughts in the comments below. For more insights from my experience as a serial entrepreneur and how we can harness the power of software to change the world, be sure to?subscribe ?to Entrepreneurship and Leadership.

Rakesh Sehgal

COO @ CodeYogi | Empowering Underprivileged Students with Job-Ready Digital Literacy | IIT Delhi | Advisor on Product, Sales, Marketing, People, and Strategy for Early-Stage Startups

1 年

"...from 50% to about 80% success rate...", this statement shows your humility, even though you've built multiple significantly successful enterprises Jyoti Bansal. Respect. I'm sure that would've served very well in listening to and taking the feedback well when you'd have taken that from the others. I've seen many people, who say they are open to feedback, but become too defensive the moment someone doesn't approve of something in their approach. It's like they go to just seek forced validation of their approach.

Great article! Also nice to hear about the immigrant entrepreneurial experience in the U.S.

Prince Malik

Engineering Manager at AWS | Passionate for Tech, People and Business

1 年

Not having a mentor is a blessing sometimes when you take a road less travelled. You don’t get painted by the same color that your mentor views through their own world view. That thought process of yours is what makes you imagine a unique color and made you take a decision to pursue building a app monitoring company which can be sold as SaaS. If you had a mentor, you might have regretted it while building your first startup. 10 brains as mentor are better than one as it mixes up to make a unique color which might not exist today.

Jyoti Bansal : thanks. I started Dawaadost post my 40th and was building a health tech co, something I didn’t know anything about - not an engineer nor a healthcare expert. A lot of what you said above, resonates well, we speak to so many people and pretty much what Dawaa dost is today is a combination of their feedback / inputs

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了