Canada-China Brief: MPs promise Taiwan visit, trade forecast uncertainty & more
Institute for Peace & Diplomacy
A foreign policy think-tank dedicated to promoting peace through dialogue, diplomacy, and constructive engagement
This week's edition covers a parliamentary group's?promise?to visit Taiwan, a forecast of?Canada-China trade?amid global economic uncertainty, and more.??
First, here's the latest from IPD:
IPD's?Roundup
Senior Fellow Jeremy Paltiel writes on Sino-Canadian relations for East Asia Forum under the backdrop of Ottawa's forthcoming Indo-Pacific strategy. He suggests that "while the ‘4Cs’ strategy (coexist, compete, cooperate and challenge) leaves room for collaboration, there is no interest in pursuing it bilaterally and no initiatives to kick-start it multilaterally."
Revisit our China Strategy Project through analysis from Carlo Dade,?Director of the?Canada West Foundation's Trade &?Investment Center. He suggests that the "best means to survive the inevitable need to cooperate with the Americans on their 'America First' Indo-Pacific strategy is going into those negotiations with a strong 'Canada First' policy."
Expert Analysis
This week, the Brief highlights commentary?from external experts exclusively provided to IPD.
On?rethinking Canada's foreign policy amid great power competition:
I think that it is useless to be able to play a central role on the international scene if we cannot analyze the interests that we would have to have... I think we need to develop an international relations policy that is pragmatic, that is much more based on Canada's security, economic, and political interests than on a policy based on values or principles.?I think it had its time. It had a certain effect in one era, but today I think it will be much more complicated. That's not to mention the?big cold war that's going on right now on the international scene, which is much more with China than with Russia today.?
—?Louise Blais , Former Canadian Ambassador & Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN
On?emerging?developing?geo-economic initiatives in the Asia Pacific:
Canada should keep track of the progress of BBBW and IPEF, as well as the players involved. Canada should join when the offer is made. However, IPEF is intended to be a precursor for later negotiations and does not include a uniform lowering of tariff or non-tariff barriers that are enforceable by members to benefit trade. Neither BBBW nor IPEF are comparable to the CPTPP —?which is the most comprehensive trade agreement in the Asia-Pacific region that Canada is a part of. Canada should continue to promote the rules-based order of the CPTPP and encourage/facilitate new members to join.
—?Sharon Sun , Trade Policy Economist,?Canada West Foundation
Top Stories
China launches diplomatic?offensive as Canadian MPs plan Taiwan trip
The aftermath of Nancy Pelosi's visit continues to unfold as China upgraded patrols in the Taiwan Strait and issued a white paper on reunification with Taiwan as Canadian MPs announced plans to visit Taipei.
The latest from Beijing?— U.S.?and Lithuanian delegations have proceeded with further?Taiwan?visits as China issued?policy statements on reunification:
Public diplomacy offensive —?Chinese ambassadors including in Ottawa have taken to?media channels?to defend China's position on?Taiwan:
Following suit??—?Eight?MPs and Senators of the Canada Taiwan Parliamentary Friendship Group announced?plans?to?visit Taiwan?in October:
领英推荐
PM shies from endorsement?—?In public?remarks , Justin Trudeau refrained from giving official government backing for the visit:
What commentators think?— Canadian experts have expressed various views on the future of Canada's relations with Taiwan vis-à-vis China:
New figures project uncertain future?for Canada-China trade
Statistics Canada?reported ?that?Canada-China trade improved slightly over the last two quarters?with?imports growing 4.7% and exports by 1.9%. Despite the rebound, exports to China?remain weak compared to?last year. From Q1:2021 to Q1:2022, the Canadian export value to China plummeted 15.7%. Similarly, Q2:2022?export numbers were also 11.7% lower than Q2:2021.
The causes?—?Canada is not the only trade partner experiencing similar patterns. Shaoyan Sun of the China Institute?assessed ?that "disappointing figures should not be over-interpreted as a deteriorating trade relationship between Canada and China."
Uncertainty ahead?—?Looking back, Canada and China?have moved past the political obstacles to bring trade back to full speed. The performance of Q3:2022 numbers will?be more indicative of short-term trade performance but many factors may continue to disrupt trade?in the?long-term.?
What They're Saying
The real China connection to the CHIPS Act is actually all about Taiwan, and specifically TSMC. Washington realized in 2019 and 2020 that TSMC was responsible for over 90% of advanced chip manufacturing and over 50% of global foundry capacity. In addition, Washington national security hawks were convinced that Xí Jìnpíng?intended to act on Taiwan by 2027 or 2030, despite no evidence that Xi or China had, or have, a timetable for reunification. The need to replicate some of the capacity that TSMC commands on U.S. soil before an escalation between China and Taiwan could potentially remove that capacity from the global market, became the real driving issue behind the new legislation.
—?Paul Triolo ,?Senior Vice President for China & Tech Policy Lead, Albright Stonebridge Group
The dangerous provocations of China over Taiwan — not just Nancy Pelosi’s visit this month — point to how the U.S. compulsion for power has reached global and unreasonable extremes. Miscalculations or errors could inadvertently make things worse. “Western values” certainly encompass Canada, but this isn’t the Cold War. It is important to realize our values are not existentially threatened... Canada and other western small powers are being taken along for the ride, arguably for the added legitimacy and credibility that collective action so often appears to represent.
—?Grant Dawson , Assistant Professor, University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Competition cannot become an end in itself. So long as outcompeting China defines the United States’ sense of purpose, Washington will continue to measure success on terms other than on its own. Rankings are a symbolic construct, not an objective condition. If the pursuit of human progress, peace, and prosperity is the ultimate objective, as Blinken has stated, then the United States does not need to beat China in order to win.
—?Jessica Chen Weiss , Michael J. Zak Professor of China & Asia-Pacific Studies,?Cornell University
Thank you for reading?IPD's Canada-China Brief!
If you enjoy our work, please consider contributing:
NEWSLETTER BY?PETER HUANG ?AND?JOHNSEN ROMERO
IMAGE CREDIT:?TAIPEI ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL OFFICE IN CANADA
Leadership, Executive Coach, Team Facilitator, Strategic Advisory
2 年Canada needs to heed experts like this or runs the risk being the little dog that barks at every passing car. "On?rethinking Canada's foreign policy amid great power competition: I think that it is useless to be able to play a central role on the international scene if we cannot analyze the interests that we would have to have... I think we need to develop an international relations policy that is pragmatic, that is much more based on Canada's security, economic, and political interests than on a policy based on values or principles.?I think it had its time. It had a certain effect in one era, but today I think it will be much more complicated. That's not to mention the?big cold war that's going on right now on the international scene, which is much more with China than with Russia today.?" —?Louise Blais, Former Canadian Ambassador & Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN
Helping multinationals navigate the ever-changing international landscape of regulations & risk management in trade compliance.
2 年Symbolic gesture or Trudeau picking a camp?