Can You Point to It?

Critical thinking skills are essential for safety management. The question being posed in this article involves critical thinking skills, asking, “Can you explain how you arrived at a particular conclusion?”

Let’s look at a few common misconceptions that can easily be cleared up by putting this into practice.

Misconception #1: All previously disturbed soils are to be classified as Type C according to Appendix A in Subpart P.

The response: Nowhere in Appendix A can someone point to any place where it says previously disturbed soils are to be classified as Type C. It does say that previously disturbed soils cannot be Type A. But the words “previously disturbed” are not found in the definition of Type C soil.

Additionally, in the federal register where the topic is explaining the definition of Type B soils, it specifically states that most disturbed soils are Type B.

So, there is no place where someone could point to and say, “It states here that previously disturbed soils are Type C”. There is no basis for that conclusion.

Misconception #2: “We consider everything as Type C soils, so we bench all of our excavations.”

The response: When using Appendix B of the OSHA Excavation Standard, there is no allowance for benching Type C soil. The worse soil that can be benched according to Appendix B is a cohesive Type B soil.

Misconception #3: “Type A is good soil. Type A will not cave in”.

The response: First of all, Type A is a very good soil, but that doesn’t mean it’s safe. It just means that it is easier to make a Type A soil safe than Type B or Type C.

In OSHA’s Appendix B for sloping and benching, there are sloping and benching options for Type A soil. If Type A won’t cave in, there wouldn’t be any of these options.

In OSHA’s Appendix C for timber shoring, there are two charts devoted to options for Type A soil. If Type A won’t cave in, there wouldn’t be a need for these charts.

In OSHA’s Appendix D for aluminum hydraulic shoring, there are charts devoted to shoring options for Type A soil. If Type A won’t cave in, there wouldn’t be a need for these options.

In most tabulated data for shoring and shields, there are specifications devoted to dealing with Type A soil. If Type A won’t cave in, there wouldn’t be any of these options.

I could go on, but I’ll close with this one. In OSHA’s Appendix F’s flow chart for protective system, the only soil type listed that won’t cave in is stable rock. If Type A won’t cave in, it would be included in the chart alongside stable rock.

The overall point of this brief discussion is, can you point to the standard, tabulated data, or the federal register to support your position on any given excavation safety topic? If not, some research should be in your future.

For more information on principles of Excavation Safety we invite you to visit www.trenchandexcavationsafety.com

Cisco Sarmiento, CSHO, O.S.H.A OTI Recognized Trainer

Branch Manager at Trench Safety Rentals - A division of Sunstate Equipment. (Formerly Trench Shore Rentals)

4 个月

Thank you for this! In our region of the southwest Myth #2 is the most common. A popular misconceptions about “C” soil and the ability to bench “C” soils as a safety measure. A contradiction of sorts that is commonly accepted.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jon Preston的更多文章

  • A Deadfall Trap

    A Deadfall Trap

    We continue to see a number of unsafe excavations where the so called “protective system” is simply a couple of road…

  • Shoring, Shields, and Shoring Shields

    Shoring, Shields, and Shoring Shields

    Do you understand the difference between "Shoring" and "Shields"? This article first appeared some time back, but I…

    1 条评论
  • IT WOULD’VE HELPED ME TO KNOW

    IT WOULD’VE HELPED ME TO KNOW

    When I began working in the trench safety industry 30 years ago, I could not have had a better start. I worked for an…

    3 条评论
  • Selecting and Developing the Competent Person

    Selecting and Developing the Competent Person

    There are three general types of construction. Building and structures that go up, roads and bridges that are…

  • CORRECT ATTITUDE IN ACTION

    CORRECT ATTITUDE IN ACTION

    Robert F. Mager wrote a very helpful book about training called “Developing Attitude Towards Learning”.

  • WHY NOT CALL IT ALL “TYPE C SOIL?”

    WHY NOT CALL IT ALL “TYPE C SOIL?”

    In the last article, we gave several reasons why the site condition known as “previously disturbed soil” does not make…

    17 条评论
  • Excavation Safety: Why a “Previously Disturbed Soil” is Not Automatically a Type C

    Excavation Safety: Why a “Previously Disturbed Soil” is Not Automatically a Type C

    To me this is truly one of life’s mysteries, but the question continues to be asked “Why isn’t “previously disturbed…

  • Test Your Excavation Safety IQ

    Test Your Excavation Safety IQ

    I ran this article over 2 years ago and there was some interesting feedback, so let's do this fun exercise again in…

    11 条评论
  • Evaluating Training’s Effectiveness

    Evaluating Training’s Effectiveness

    I saw a book on Amazon and plan to order it today. The title is “Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation”.

  • Excavation Safety concepts found in the Federal Register

    Excavation Safety concepts found in the Federal Register

    These interesting selections are from the Federal Register of Subpart P (Excavations). If you have a copy of my book…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了