Can W.H.O. learn and earn the public's trust?
Christopher Tang
Vice President, Board Member, Editor, Plenary Speaker, Center Director, Columnist, Op-Ed journalist, Professor
When the whole world is struggling with the Covid-19 Pandemic, W.H.O. argues that it is still "inconclusive" that the "Coronavirus is airborne". Understandably, it may take years to find a definitive answer to this scientific question. But W.H.O. appears to ignore the fact that their statement can cause millions of deaths. We should not stay silent over this issue. So, please feel free to re-share.
- New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/04/health/239-experts-with-one-big-claim-the-coronavirus-is-airborne.html reported that 239 scientists in 32 countries have outlined the evidence showing that smaller particles can infect people, and are calling for the agency to revise its recommendations. These researchers plan to publish their letter in a scientific journal next week. And yet, W.H.O. responded that they welcome these scientists to "challenge" W.H.O.'s current recommendations . This is not a pubic debate, but a public health issue.
- W.H.O has been slowed in recommending mask wearing that could have saved many lives. In January, W.H.O. claimed that masks were probably ineffective against the virus and weren’t recommended. Not until early April, the agencies reversed course, saying people should wear face coverings to complement other social-distancing measures. See: https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/mask-cultural-differences-christopher-tang/?trackingId=FOgbi59aNE6Z3k7fMB6FpQ%3D%3D
W.H.O should not view the scientists' statement as a political statement. To protect life, W.H.O. should at least alert the public that it is "plausible" that the virus is airborne, and facial covering and social distancing can save lives.
W.H.O should learn from their own mistakes and do the right thing to earn some trust before it is too late!