Can organizations implement RPA without having a digital transformation strategy - what would you have said?
Morning Brew unsplash creditCopyTex

Can organizations implement RPA without having a digital transformation strategy - what would you have said?

At last weeks Udacity + #UiPath's RPA Insiders Virtual Conference I was asked a question 'Can organizations implement RPA without having a digital transformation strategy/plan?' I gave a pretty quick answer, then a stat, then some further comments which are outlined below.

What would you have said in 30 seconds or less?

  • Can they? Yes.
  • Should they? No

Statistic:

EY several years ago talked about 50% of RPA programs failing to deliver on promise. I personally believe this figure to be higher as people simply did not want to admit their programs failed. They are a large many reasons why RPA programs fail i.e. the RPA program simply did not get the ROI expected e.g. programs were halted by risk, compliance, audit or security teams as RPA teams neglected to inform them; teams did not talk to IT and engage in change management so automations broke; a tool was bought and then problems sought but the tool did not work; processes were not suitable or ready for automation; or quite often the program was not aligned to business strategy and had limited purpose in the eye of the exec or leadership teams; and...and...and

Further comments:

  • You should not introduce RPA and then go look for business problems to solve. Understand the business problem then find a tool or tools to solve for that. Not every tool will worth with every organisations IT, so test the tooling too.
  • Organisations need to have a business strategy (i.e. a game plan of where they want to play and earn a return) AND that must be communicated to the business. Some executive teams forget to do a good enough job on the communication part and wonder why their teams confused.
  • Doing digital or automation is not a strategy.
  • Organisations must have an actual automation | digital strategy (lots don't) and that must be clearly aligned to their business strategy.
  • Before buying any RPA platform organisations must build a business case, one a CFO will sign off on, and ensure a business team is willing to realise the benefits in the P&L.
  • So always, always 'business plan first, tooling and automation strategy second'.


What would you have said if you had those same 30 seconds?


#intelligentautomation #bots #rpaworks #digitaltransformation#roboticprocessautomation #rpa #cognitiveautomation #digitaldisruption#digitalworkforce #processautomation #digitalfuture #digitalstrategy

Other articles: If you like this article then you may find these articles of use too.

  1. How to build a business case for Intelligent Automation and Robotic Process Automation
  2. 30 ways to build a pipeline of processes suitable for Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Intelligent Automation (IA)
  3. The biggest lie told to RPA customers - 50 robots equals success
  4. 40 essential selection criteria to choose an RPA platform

If this could benefit someone else tag them and share this.

Free to reuse: We are a community of RPA and Intelligent Automation experts with years of real world experience. We have stories to tell and the scars to show for it. We share our collective wisdom for free to simply provide as much value as we can to you. Therefore, if you want to post this article on your LinkedIn page then please feel free to do so. The more information we share within the RPA community the more likely businesses are to succeed with this excellent technology.

Further Help: If I can help you in any way please do reach out.

Note: The views expressed above are our views and not those of my employer or the employers of the contributing experts.







Francis Carden

Analysis.Tech | Analyst | CEO, Founder, Automation Den | Keynote Speaker | Thought Leader | LOWCODE | NOCODE | GenAi | Godfather of RPA | Inventor of Neuronomous| UX Guru | Investor | Podcaster

4 年

Spot on. The reality is, the entire RPA market was derived, and built on the opposite. In many cases, sadly, it's still pushed this way. Business problems run deep and so this was seen as a panacea. It's not, without a bigger plan. Thanks for adding sanity.

回复
Can Adigüzel

TISAX, ISO27001 Pragmatisch und effektiv! I Mehr Produktivit?t, weniger Kosten I Uns vertrauen über 40 Kunden I Triathlete ??

4 年

Yes, then I can bet on the failure of this implementation Kieran Gilmurray ??

Raju Udhas

Freelance Robotic Process Automation Consultant, Solution Architect | TOGAF 9 Certified Enterprise Architecture Practitioner | Lean Six Sigma, Product Development Expert & Coach

4 年

No way, any investment in automation without long-term transformation strategy is waste. The other way round I would say RPA is one of the best lever in today's date for transformation and assessment of AI opportunities for organization.

Nkrumah Dubazana

Full-Stack Software Engineer | Data Analyst | RPA Developer | Passionate About Automating Processes & Scalable Solutions

4 年

brilliant, thank you Kieran Gilmurray ???.

Sudip Roy, MBCS

Project Management | Business Analysis | AI implementation | Agile & DevOps | Data and Cloud | ERP and CRM | Change Management

4 年

Probably can in the short term, but the biggest mistake will be to run a digital transformation separate to an RPA programme. Both should have a single owner and a strategy playing on the strengths of both.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kieran Gilmurray的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了