Can Neurotheology explain God (Krishna)
Picture reviewed from NPR.org

Can Neurotheology explain God (Krishna)

Neurotheology is an emerging field that seeks to explore the intersection between neuroscience and religion/spirituality. The impact of Neurotheology can be viewed from different angles, including:

  1. Understanding the Brain-Behavior Relationship: Neurotheology research can help us understand the neural basis of religious and spiritual experiences, which can inform our understanding of the brain-behavior relationship. This can have implications for various fields, including psychology, philosophy, and theology.
  2. Promoting Interfaith Dialogue: Neurotheology can potentially promote interfaith dialogue by revealing the commonalities between different religious and spiritual experiences, and how they are processed in the brain. This can help people of different faiths to better understand and appreciate each other's beliefs and practices.
  3. Addressing Mental Health Issues: Neurotheology research may also have implications for mental health issues. For example, studies have shown that practices such as meditation and prayer can have positive effects on mental health. Understanding the neural basis of these practices can help inform the development of new treatments for mental health issues.
  4. Ethical Considerations: As with any emerging field, there are ethical considerations to be addressed. For example, some have raised concerns about the potential for neurotheology research to be misused for religious or political purposes.

In summary, the impact of neurotheology is still being explored, but it has the potential to inform our understanding of the brain, promote interfaith dialogue, address mental health issues, and raise important ethical considerations.


The question is whether neurotheology can explain God?

Neurotheology is a field that seeks to explore the intersection between neuroscience and religion/spirituality. While neurotheology research can help us understand the neural basis of religious and spiritual experiences, it is important to note that it cannot provide definitive answers about the existence or nature of God.

While neurotheology can provide insights into how religious experiences are processed in the brain, it cannot prove or disprove the existence of a divine being or provide a complete understanding of God.

That being said, neurotheology research can help us understand how the brain processes and interprets religious experiences, which can inform our understanding of the role that religion and spirituality play in human life. It can also help us better understand the subjective experience of religious belief and how it relates to brain function.

In summary, while neurotheology cannot provide a complete explanation of God, it can provide valuable insights into the neural basis of religious experiences and how they are processed in the brain.

Neurotheology experiments seek to explore the neural basis of religious and spiritual experiences. Some examples of neurotheology experiments include:

  1. Brain imaging studies: These studies use techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) to identify areas of the brain that are active during religious and spiritual experiences.
  2. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): TMS involves applying magnetic pulses to specific areas of the brain to temporarily disrupt neural activity. In neurotheology experiments, TMS has been used to investigate the role of specific brain regions in religious experiences.
  3. Electroencephalography (EEG): EEG measures electrical activity in the brain and has been used to investigate the neural correlates of religious experiences.
  4. Behavioral studies: These studies use behavioral measures such as reaction time and accuracy to assess cognitive processing during religious and spiritual experiences.
  5. Pharmacological studies: These studies investigate the effects of psychoactive substances such as psilocybin (found in certain types of mushrooms) and DMT (found in ayahuasca) on religious and spiritual experiences.

Srila Prabhupada explains God from a scriptural perspective:

A Definition of God

Modern man’s concepts of God are many and varied. Children tend to imagine an old man with a white beard. Many adults regard God as an invisible force or a mental concept or as all humanity, the universe, or even oneself. In this lecture, ?rīla Prabhupāda describes in detail the?K???a?consciousness concept—a surprisingly intimate view of God.

Ladies and gentlemen, I thank you very much for kindly participating in this?K???a?consciousness movement. When this society was registered in 1966 in New York, a friend suggested that it be named the Society for God Consciousness. He thought that the name?K???a?was sectarian. The dictionary also says that?K???a?is a?Hindu?god’s name. But in actuality, if any name can be attributed to God, it is “K???a.”

Actually God has no particular name. By saying He has no name, we mean that no one knows how many names He has. Since God is unlimited, His names also must be unlimited. Therefore we cannot settle on one name. For instance,?K???a?is sometimes called?Ya?odā-nandana, the son of mother?Ya?odā; or?Devakī-nandana, the son of?Devakī; or?Vasudeva-nandana, the son of?Vasudeva; or?Nanda-nandana, the son of?Nanda. Sometimes He is called?Pārtha-sārathi, indicating that He acted as the charioteer of?Arjuna, who is sometimes called?Pārtha, the son of?P?thā.

God has many dealings with His many devotees, and according to those dealings, He is called certain names. Since He has innumerable devotees and innumerable relations with them, He also has innumerable names. We cannot hit on any one name. But the name?K???a?means “all-attractive.” God attracts everyone; that is the definition of?God.?We have seen many pictures of?K???a, and we see that He attracts the cows, calves, birds, beasts, trees, plants, and even the water in?V?ndāvana. He is attractive to the cowherd boys, to the?gopīs,?to?Nanda?Mahārāja, to the Pā??avas, and to all human society. Therefore if any particular name can be given to God, that name is “K???a.”

Parā?ara?Muni, a great sage and the father of Vyāsadeva, who compiled all the Vedic literatures, gave the following definition of?God:

ai?varyasya samagrasya

vīryasya?ya?asa???riya?

jnāna-vairāgyayo? caiva

sa??ā??bhaga?iti?gana

(Vi??u?Purā?a?6.5.47)

Bhagavān, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is thus defined by?Parā?ara?Muni?as one who is full in six opulences—who has full strength, fame, wealth, knowledge, beauty, and renunciation.

Bhagavān, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is the proprietor of all riches. There are many rich men in the world, but no one can claim that he possesses all the wealth. Nor can anyone claim that no one is richer than he. We understand from the??rīmad-Bhāgavatam,?however, that when?K???a?was present on this earth He had 16,108 wives, and each wife lived in a palace made of marble and bedecked with jewels. The rooms were filled with furniture made of ivory and gold, and there was great opulence everywhere. These descriptions are all given vividly in the??rīmad-Bhāgavatam.?In the history of human society we cannot find anyone who had sixteen thousand wives or sixteen thousand palaces. Nor did?K???a?go to one wife one day and another wife another day. No, He was personally present in every palace at the same time. This means that He expanded Himself in 16,108 forms. This is impossible for an ordinary man, but it is not very difficult for God. If God is unlimited, He can expand Himself in unlimited forms, otherwise there is no meaning to the word?unlimited.?God is omnipotent; He can maintain not only sixteen thousand wives but sixteen million and still encounter no difficulty, otherwise there is no meaning to the word?omnipotent.

These are all attractive features. We experience in this material world that if a man is very rich, he is attractive. In America, for instance, Rockefeller and Ford are very attractive because of their riches. They are attractive even though they do not possess all the wealth of the world. How much more attractive, then, is God, who is the possessor of all riches.

Similarly,?K???a?has unlimited strength. His strength was present from the moment of His birth. When?K???a?was only three months old, the?Pūtanā?demon attempted to kill Him, but instead she was killed by?K???a. That is God. God is God from the beginning. He does not become God by some meditation or mystic power.?K???a?is not that type of God.?K???a?was God from the very beginning of His appearance.

K???a?also has unlimited fame. Of course, we are devotees of?K???a?and know of Him and glorify Him, but apart from us, many millions in the world are aware of the fame of the?Bhagavad-gītā.?In all countries all over the world the?Bhagavad-gītā?is read by philosophers, psychologists, and religionists. We are also finding very good sales with our?Bhagavad-gītā?As It Is.?This is because the commodity is pure gold. There are many editions of the?Bhagavad-gītā,?but they are not pure. Ours is selling more because we are presenting the?Bhagavad-gītā?as it is. The fame of the?Bhagavad-gītā?is K???a’s fame.

Beauty, another opulence, is possessed unlimitedly by?K???a.?K???a?Himself is very beautiful, as are all His associates. Those who were pious in a previous life receive an opportunity in this material world to take birth in good families and good nations. The American people are very rich and beautiful, and these opulences are a result of pious activities. All over the world people are attracted to the Americans because they are advanced in scientific knowledge, riches, beauty, and so on. This planet is an insignificant planet within the universe, yet within this planet, one country—America—has so many attractive features. We can just imagine, then, how many attractive features must be possessed by God, who is the creator of the entire cosmic manifestation. How beautiful He must be—He who has created all beauty.

A person is attractive not only because of his beauty, but also because of his knowledge. A scientist or philosopher may be attractive because of his knowledge, but what knowledge is more sublime than that given by?K???a?in the?Bhagavad-gītā? There is no comparison in the world to such knowledge. At the same time,?K???a?possesses full renunciation ( vairāgya). So many things are working under K???a’s direction in this material world, but actually?K???a?is not present here. A big factory may continue to work, although the owner may not be present. Similarly, K???a’s potencies are working under the direction of His assistants, the demigods. Thus?K???a?Himself is aloof from the material world. This is all described in the revealed scriptures.

God, therefore, has many names according to His activities, but because He possesses so many opulences, and because with these opulences He attracts everyone, He is called?K???a. The Vedic literature asserts that God has many names, but “K???a” is the principal name.

The purpose of this?K???a?consciousness movement is to propagate God’s name, God’s glories, God’s activities, God’s beauty, and God’s love. There are many things within this material world, and all of them are within?K???a. The most prominent feature of this material world is sex, and that also is present in?K???a. We are worshiping?Rādhā?and?K???a, and attraction exists between them, but material attraction and spiritual attraction are not the same. In?K???a, sex is real, but here in the material world it is unreal. Everything we deal with here is present in the spiritual world, but here it has no real value. It is only a reflection. In store windows we see many mannequins, but no one cares about them, because everyone knows they are false. A mannequin may be very beautiful, but still it is false. When people see a beautiful woman, however, they are attracted because they think she is real. In actuality, the so-called living are also dead, because this body is simply a lump of matter; as soon as the soul leaves the body, no one would care to see the so-called beautiful body of the woman. The real factor, the real attracting force, is the spiritual soul.

In the material world everything is made of dead matter; therefore it is simply an imitation. The reality of things exists in the spiritual world. Those who have read the?Bhagavad-gītā?can understand what the spiritual world is like, for there it is described:

paras?tasmāt?tu?bhāvo ’nyo

’vyakto ’vyaktāt?sanātana?

ya??sa?sarve?u?bhūte?u

na?yatsu?na?vina?yati

“Yet there is another nature, which is eternal and is transcendental to this manifested and unmanifested matter. It is supreme and is never annihilated. When all in this world is annihilated, that part remains as it is.” (Bhagavad-gītā?8.20)

Scientists are attempting to calculate the length and breadth of this material world, but they cannot begin. It will take them thousands of years simply to travel to the nearest star. And what to speak of the spiritual world? Since we cannot know the material world, how can we know what is beyond it? The point is that we must know from authoritative sources.

The most authoritative source is?K???a, for He is the reservoir of all knowledge. No one is wiser or more knowledgeable than?K???a.?K???a?informs us that beyond this material world is a spiritual sky, which is filled with innumerable planets. That sky is far, far greater than material space, which constitutes only one fourth of the entire creation. Similarly, the living entities within the material world are but a small portion of the living entities throughout the creation. This material world is compared to a prison, and just as prisoners represent only a small percentage of the total population, so the living entities within the material world constitute but a fragmental portion of all living entities.

Those who have revolted against God—who are criminal—are placed in this material world. Sometimes criminals say that they don’t care for the government, but nonetheless they are arrested and punished. Similarly, living entities who declare their defiance of God are placed in the material world.

Originally the living entities are all part and parcel of God and are related to Him just as sons are related to their father. Christians also consider God the supreme father. Christians go to church and pray, “Our Father, who art in heaven.’, The conception of God as father is also in the?Bhagavad-gītā?(14.4):

sarva-yoni?u?kaunteya

mūrtaya??sambhavanti?yā?

tāsā??brahma?mahad yonir

aha??bīja-prada??pitā

“It should be understood that all the species of life, O son of?Kuntī, are made possible by birth in this material nature, and that I am the seed-giving father.”

There are 8,400,000 species of life—including aquatics, plants, birds, beasts, insects, and human beings. Of the human species, most are uncivilized, and out of the few civilized species only a small number of human beings take to religious life. Out of many so-called religionists, most identify themselves by designations, claiming, “I am?Hindu,” “I am Muslim,” “I am Christian,” and so on. Some engage in philanthropic work, some give to the poor, and open schools and hospitals. This altruistic process is called?karma-kā??a.?Out of millions of these?karma-kā??īs,?there may be one?j?ānī?(“one who knows”). Out of millions of?j?ānīs,?one may be liberated, and out of billions of liberated souls, one may be able to understand?K???a. This, then, is the position of?K???a. As?K???a?Himself says in the?Bhagavad-gītā?(7.3):

manu?yā?ā??sahasre?u

ka?cid?yatati?siddhaye

yatatām?api?siddhānā?

ka?cin?mā??vetti?tattvata?

“Out of many thousands among men, one may endeavor for perfection, and of those who have achieved perfection, hardly one knows Me in truth.”

Understanding?K???a, then, is very difficult. But although the understanding of God is a difficult subject, God explains Himself in the?Bhagavad-gītā.?He says, “I am like this, and I am like this. The material nature is like this, and the spiritual nature is like that. The living entities are like this, and the Supreme Soul is like that.” Thus everything is completely described in the?Bhagavad-gītā.?Although understanding God is very difficult, it is not difficult when God Himself gives us His own knowledge. Actually that is the only process by which we can understand God. To understand God by our own speculation is not possible, for God is unlimited and we are limited. Our knowledge and perception are both very limited, so how can we understand the unlimited? If we simply accept the version of the unlimited, we can come to understand Him. That understanding is our perfection.

Speculative knowledge of God will lead us nowhere. If a boy wants to know who his father is, the simple process is to ask his mother. The mother will then say, “This is your father.” This is the way of perfect knowledge. Of course, one may speculate about one’s father, wondering if this is the man or if that is the man, and one may wander over the whole city, asking, “Are you my father? Are you my father?” The knowledge derived from such a process, however, will always remain imperfect. One will never find his father in this way. The simple process is to take the knowledge from an authority—in this case, the mother. She simply says, “My dear boy, here is your father.” In this way our knowledge is perfect. Transcendental knowledge is similar. I was just previously speaking of a spiritual world. This spiritual world is not subject to our speculation. God says, “There is a spiritual world, and that is My headquarters.” In this way we receive knowledge from?K???a, the best authority. We may not be perfect, but our knowledge is perfect because it is received from the perfect source.

The?K???a?consciousness movement is meant to give perfect knowledge to human society. By such knowledge one can understand who he is, who God is, what the material world is, why we have come here, why we must undergo so much tribulation and misery, and why we have to die. Of course, no one wants to die, but death will come. No one wants to become an old man, but still old age comes. No one wants to suffer from disease, but surely enough, disease comes. These are the real problems of human life, and they are yet to be solved. Civilization attempts to improve eating, sleeping, mating, and defense, but these are not the real problems. A man sleeps, and a dog sleeps. A man is not more advanced simply because he has a nice apartment. In both cases, the business is the same—sleeping. Man has discovered atomic weapons for defense, but the dog also has teeth and claws and can also defend himself. In both cases, defense is there. Man cannot say that because he has the atomic bomb he can conquer the entire world or the entire universe. That is not possible. Man may possess an elaborate method for defense, or a gorgeous method for eating, sleeping, or mating, but that does not make him advanced. We may call his advancement polished animalism, and that is all.

Real advancement means knowing God. If we are lacking knowledge of God, we are not actually advanced. Many rascals deny the existence of God because if there is no God they can continue their sinful activities. It may be very nice for them to think that there is no God, but God will not die simply because we deny Him. God is there, and His administration is there. By His orders the sun is rising, the moon is rising, the water flows, and the ocean abides by the tide. Thus everything functions under His order. Since everything is going on very nicely, how can one realistically think that God is dead? If there is mismanagement, we may say that there is no government, but if there is good management, how can we say that there is no government? Just because people do not know God, they say that God is dead, that there is no God, or that God has no form. But we are firmly convinced that there is God and that?K???a?is God. Therefore we are worshiping Him. That is the process of?K???a?consciousness. Try to understand it. Thank you very much.

Conclusion:

God is not to be known by mundane senses. We need to seek shelter of higher authorities. Om Tat Sat!

Catherine W

Assistant to Judy Fay London--owner of JudyFayLondon.com. I don't check messages. On linkedin is my work.

1 年

??

Doug Pieterse

Managing Director at FBT Solutions- Petroleum and Materials Handling

1 年

I should imagine that the article written by Proffessor of theology is probably worth taking note of. In addition ,I would asume being a Hare Krishna you filled with wisdom daily , so when you about 90 you would have a great undersatnding of how the world works, and how and where you can try and part your years of wisdom with. My appologies if you guys are around 90, But if you are youngsters under 45 living in this day and age and cant see whats happenning in our world , which is probably the case as yo are more than likely situated in a monestry far from everything, how can comment. then of course you are getting your wisdom from an manmade idol, thsi tells me that you have no clue what the proffessor is talking about, you have no clue there is only one God and his son who died for us and rose 3 days later and you have no clue how the proffessors work ties up with Christianity not Carpentry.

Prasanna J

Founder Director | Cybersecurity, Defence technologies, Regenerative Medicine

1 年

Why do we need science to tell us about spirituality. We all have and can feel it inside us.all instruments of spirituality are within us.

Naveen Jadon

RSM -NORTH at MILLENNIUM VITRIFIED TILES PRIVATE LIMITED

1 年

Meditation prepares brain to understand the complex process of problem and resolve with ease, And Shape of frontal lobes becomes like Lord Ganesha Sitting in comfort posture

Mohit Kakkar ???

Using Guidewire and Duckcreek shouldn't be painful, accelerate adoption and analytics with Whatfix.

1 年

On the same lines, we've made some significant headway at Vedic Sadhana Foundation, we scientifically measured the impact of 2-3 minutes of mantra chanting on the human brain and the results were astounding. On average, we noticed a 30% improvement in calmness and body stillness over more than 100 unique experiments.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了