Called. It.
Tim Milosch, Ph.D.
Interim Director of Digital Learning, Adjunct Faculty (Political Science)
You don’t need me to tell you there was an election this past Tuesday. And you certainly don’t me to tell you who won but, if you need a reminder, it was this guy:
At the end of last year, I made four predictions related to Election 2024:
Since making those predictions, I’ve largely spent the year filling in the details, and the early post mortems indicate that, sure enough, the race came down to the kitchen table issues that Biden, then Harris, and the Democrats in general just couldn’t get around.
So, it was an issues election, sure, but I’m not entirely sure it was just the issues that explained such a sweeping Republican win.
Just to recap, Republicans have largely run the boards, winning
While we’re still waiting on final results from several House raises, the Republicans appear quite confident that chamber will be added to the ‘W’ column as well.
But wait, there’s more:
The scope of the victory, given the closeness of the polls in the last week may seem surprising, but only if you’re Vox and the like minded who saw this election only in terms of Donald Trump and preserving democracy. “Why, oh why,” they wonder, “does the rest of America not see the truth, or worse see Donald Trump as authoritarian and don’t care?”
Well, aside from the fact that Donald Trump has already been President and did not turn America into the Fourth Reich, even when given the chance when Covid lockdowns rolled around, let’s do a brief rundown of how Democrats approached the race:
The collapse of the Democratic coalition
They replaced the guy who beat Donald Trump with a candidate who was largely unknown and unpopular and gave her less than four months to overcome those two handicaps while weighted down by the many failings of the Biden administration, some of which she contributed to.
But it wasn’t just the Democrats or Joe Biden that failed. Harris-Walz failed too.
Despite clear signals that voters were concerned about the economy and illegal immigration/border security, Harris-Walz followed the Biden administration’s lead, adopted a “PR Politics” approach and chose to either a) downplay those issues or b) argue they weren’t as bad as people thought, and were in fact good for the country.
This fundamental disconnect between the Harris-Walz ticket and the voters was a disconnect between Democrats and voters more broadly that Trump’s inroads into the Blue Wall and the blocs of the vaunted “Obama coalition” clearly indicate.
Call it hubris, call it stupidity, call it an echo chamber, call it realignment, whatever it was (and it was all of it), Democrats had a reckoning coming and those chickens have now come home to roost.
I could go on about the election results, but there’s so much ink being spilled on that and where we go from here, I don’t really want to add to that noise. Rather, let me offer some thoughts on some of the underreported elements of this Election that make it historic in ways other than Trump winning, and then we’ll do some managing of expectations.
Trends to track
OK, so Trump 2.0 it will be, but is it going to be a rerun of 2016-2020? No. Hell no. How can it be? The country, and indeed the world, are in very different places.?
The economy
First, Biden-era inflation and deficits are going to act as weights on the economy. Yes, markets boomed and rival currencies dropped against the dollar at the news that Trump won, and the Fed cut rates. All good news, but it’ll take more than that to address to get America off the highly addictive drug of cheap credit. Elon Musk has already hinted at harder economic times
The border
Second, Trump is dead serious about mass deportations
The Trump administration
Third, Trump’s administration will look and behave a lot differently than the first one, so there hopefully won’t be the sense of undisciplined chaos this time around. The first one was emblematic of a political newcomer distrustful of the existing party apparatus. That dynamic is largely gone, and Trump’s new Chief of Staff is apparently someone who commands bipartisan respect.
Foreign policy
Fourth, on the foreign policy front, Trump will have a much more challenging landscape than his first go around, but is also going to be looking for quick resolution to some existing conflicts. Both Harris and Trump sent “get to the ceasefire before I’m in office” messages to Benjamin Netanyau, and Russia is sensing a ceasefire opportunity in Ukraine with a change of leadership in America and a new offensive going in Ukraine. Trump may get his ceasefires, but they’re unlikely to bring any substantive peace. China, at least, seems eager to strike a conciliatory tone.?
Opposition relations
Despite the generally conciliatory concession speech of Kamala Harris, there’s every indication that Democrats are dusting off the “Resistance” playbook in anticipation of running back Trump’s first term based on the premise that Trump+Project 25 = American Fascism. That is not at all based in fact or reality, and is unlikely to win back lost voters, especially if voters perceive such opposition to be preventing policy implementation
Bottom line, Trump understands his mandate. It’s not to institute the Fourth Reich, and he has no intention of doing so. Democrats would do well to recognize this and approach the second Trump administration as a “normal” presidency.
Field notes
You're receiving the full edition of my Substack newsletter this week. If you enjoy this kind of overview/briefing of the week's major news events, please consider becoming a subscriber on Substack!