A Call for Economic Rethink in Nigeria
President Bola Ahmad Tinubu

A Call for Economic Rethink in Nigeria

By Baba Yunus Muhammad

Nigeria stands at a critical crossroads as the nation witnesses an unprecedented wave of protests. Hundreds of thousands of citizens, particularly, the youth have taken to the streets in major cities such as Abuja and Lagos, voicing their frustrations over severe economic hardship and rampant insecurity. These protests, which began last Thursday, 1st August, 2024 are a direct consequence of the economic policies implemented by President Ahmad Tinubu’s administration, heavily influenced by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

At no other time in modern Nigerian economic history has it witnessed such a deliberate and orchestrated dismantling of economic capacity. The monetarist economic policies pursued by the Tinubu administration over the past one and a half years have led to an enormous destruction of Nigeria’s economic potential and a waste of its human and material resources. These policies, influenced by Western monetarist ideologies, have not only stifled growth but also exacerbated poverty and inequality, leaving the majority of Nigerians struggling to make ends meet.

The IMF and World Bank’s economic prescriptions have long been criticized for their one-size-fits-all approach, which often ignores the unique socio-economic contexts of the countries they aim to assist. In Nigeria, these policies have resulted in austerity measures that cut public spending, increase taxes and import tariff, and removal of subsidies on petroleum and agricutural products, all of which disproportionately affect the poor and vulnerable populations. The resulting economic strain has led to a surge in unemployment, unprecedented rise in the cost of living, and an overall decline in the quality of life.

Moreover, the social and political consequences of these policies are deeply troubling. The growing discontent among the populace is not just about economic hardship; it is also about a perceived erosion of sovereignty and control over the nation’s economic future. The continued application of these policies risks further destabilizing an already fragile political landscape, potentially leading to increased civil unrest and a breakdown in social cohesion.

Examining other African countries currently under the IMF’s economic treatment provides a stark warning. Kenya and Ghana for example, has experienced significant social and political turmoil as a result of austerity measures imposed by the IMF. In Kenya, these measures have led to tax increases, severe cuts in public sector jobs and social services, resulting in widespread protests and a deteriorating social fabric. Ghana, similarly, has faced economic instability and public outcry over the rising cost of living and lack of economic opportunities.

It is imperative for Nigeria to consider alternative economic paradigms that prioritize the well-being of its citizens over the dictates of international financial institutions. One such alternative is the interest-free paradigm of economic development. This model, rooted in Islamic economic principles, emphasizes risk-sharing, social equity, and the prohibition of interest (riba), which is seen as exploitative. Adopting such a framework could provide a more holistic and sustainable approach to economic development, one that aligns with the cultural and ethical values of the Nigerian people.

The interest-free economic model advocates for profit-and-loss sharing mechanisms, ethical investment, and social justice. By focusing on these principles, Nigeria could foster an economic environment that encourages entrepreneurship, reduces inequality, and promotes social welfare. Countries like Malaysia and Indonesia have successfully integrated Islamic finance into their economic systems, leading to robust economic growth and social development.

The evidence is clear: the current economic policies endorsed by the IMF and World Bank are failing the Nigerian people. The ongoing protests serve as a powerful reminder that the status quo is no longer acceptable. There is therefore, an urgent need to review and rethink these Western-inspired monetarist policies. Nigeria must explore and adopt alternative economic models that are more attuned to its unique socio-economic realities. Only then can the nation hope to achieve sustainable development, social justice, and long-term stability. The time for change is now, and the voices of the Nigerian people must be heard!

In today’s world, physical slavery no longer exists, but it has been replaced by economic bondage and servitude, wherein the relationship between the most powerful nations on earth and weaker countries has become akin to the relationship of a master and a slave. For example, loans disguised as 'aid-packages' are given by rich countries (through IMF, World Bank Group etc)to weaker nations who have no option but to accept whatever strings are attached. Invariably, the crippling levels of interest mean that the short-term loans lead to long-term misery and liability. The end result is that the defaulting country has no choice but to bend to the will of the dominant nation. Such slavery is utterly immoral. The debt issue is global and requires global solutions. We urgently need creative and scalable solutions that harness the positive power of solidarity and coordinated action to tackle this global challenge and maintain this momentum beyond times of crisis. This is the only way to break the chains of debt and change the financial architecture in its entirety.

回复
Bale Steven

#Accounting & Finance #Enterprise Mentor and Coach #IT Professional #Project Manager #Entrepreneur #Tunnel Engineering & Construction

7 个月

The generation Z in Kenya rejected the IMF and the World Bank influence over President Ruto and that led to protests upon protests resulting in many deaths and a repeat of that scenario is already playing out in Nigeria, what is the matter with these institutions? Are they supposed to craft the economic destinies of African countries? Is this part of their mandates? What exactly is their interest?

回复
Ammar Muhammad

Attended Federal University of health sciences Azare Bauchi state

7 个月

*"Cruelty of Power"* *By Ammar Muhammad* In a land of plenty, where riches abound A few hold power, while the masses are bound To poverty, to suffering, to endless strife While leaders feast, and live a luxurious life Their cruelty knows no bounds, no shame They loot and plunder, leaving only pain The future of the youth, they do not care Their only concern, is their grip on power to share The people cry out, but their voices are drowned By the noise of corruption, that echoes all around The streets are filled, with the sounds of despair As hope is lost, and the future's not fair But still we rise, we resist, we fight For a better tomorrow, a brighter light Where leaders serve, not just their own interests But the people, the nation, and its future's prospects Let us stand strong, united as one And demand a change, before the day is done For a Nigeria, where all can thrive Not just the few, but the many, alive. ?Ammar Muhammad

回复
Adetope Adeniji

Economist/Motivational speaker/Author/Political Analyst & Economist/Musicologist

7 个月

Governance and policies are not meant to be people's infliction and conduit pipe to hardship, but friendly, accommodating and creating an enviable envision and environment to have a qualitative welfare and conductivity. There might not be any reasonable gain in any formulation of policies that is anti humanity...! The essence of governance should never be in seclusion of the govern, else the nature of operations become ineffectual and ambiguous to be explained for the usefulness of the collective people. If the set of the people to address their problems are dying of hunger and various other inhumane decisions; then, such a plan for the people is against them irrespective of the desire out of such plan. Government should be by the people and for the people to make it reasonable. People are clamouring of hunger, you are reading the long term plans...! Both short term and long term plans are meant to be adequately attended to, to have the nature of the citizens that can be attentive for all other proposed plans. I think, the economic advisers to our incumbent President are misleading... The course for the protest surge and the incessant continuity of the societal unrest.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Baba Yunus Muhammad的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了