California's New Labor Bill

California's New Labor Bill

On September 18th, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the “Employees and Independent Contractors” bill into law. This law, also known as Assembly Bill 5 or AB5, will rewrite California’s employment laws to make it harder for employers to classify workers as independent contractors.

This is good news for many workers in the gig economy. A gig economy is a free market system in which temporary positions are common and organizations contract with independent workers for short-term engagements. Unions and labor organizers have been advocating for the bill because it will protect workers who are currently treated as independent contractors. But the new law also has many independent truckers frustrated, and knock-on effects could be seen across the trucking industry.

What’s new in the AB5 law?

The main gist of the new law is that employers must follow a 3-part test (known as the ABC test) to determine whether they can classify workers as independent contractors.

The three parts of the test are:

  1. The individual is free from control or direction of the hiring entity in connection with performance of the work.
  2. The individual is performing work outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.
  3. The individual is usually engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.

It’s the second part of the test that will snag independent trucking contractors. Since a truck driver working for a carrier performs work that is indeed within the company’s usual course of business, they wouldn’t qualify as independent contractors.

The AB5 law constitutes organized labor’s biggest legislative victory in years and will reclassify around one million California workers as company employees. This means they’ll be eligible for benefits, pay guarantees, union membership, and more. That means the bill, since it protects workers in the gig economy from exploitation, has support from unions– including the California Teamsters Public Affairs Council, which represents truck drivers. Truck drivers are part of this vulnerable group; lawsuits involving employer misclassification cases have been filed against FedEx, NFI, and XPO. Those lawsuits tend to allege that the employer classified drivers or workers as contractors to avoid providing overtime, meal breaks, and minimum wage.

Others, particularly the California Trucking Association, have been formally opposed to the bill.

What should we watch out for?

Currently, some independent truck drivers fear this law will force them to shut down or move. Since they won’t be able to run their own business, they will make less money. As employees, they’d lose flexibility. The bill makes it virtually impossible for two trucking companies to contract together. Companies, for their part, are worried they can’t afford to hire on additional drivers as official employees, nor can they afford to buy additional rigs.

But it doesn’t have to be that way.

There are written exceptions for industry workers like freelance writers, artists, doctors, and commercial fishermen. The law could have been amended to address worker misclassification issues while protecting the 70,000 independent contractor truckers.

Now, some say these owner-operators are vulnerable, and if they leave the business, this could affect driver supply and demand (though, to be fair, there is a driver surplus right now, as we recently noted).

As Joe Rajkovacz, Western States Trucking Association’s director of government affairs put it: “In many respects, it will end the owner-operator model in this state as we know it.

What’s next?

The legislation isn’t over. Trucking industry lawyers want a federal court to rule that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (F4A) preempts California law. The FA4 law gives the federal government power to set rules for interstate trucking.

This hypothetical federal court intervention will almost certainly not happen before the January enforcement date. That means companies should still respond to AB5– but in reality, some will likely ignore it and wait into federal courts make a ruling.

There are other ways around AB5 in the meantime: carriers and drivers can go through brokers, which would mean they are “free from the control and direction of the hiring entity,” the hiring entity being the broker, allowing the driver to qualify as an independent contractor. An owner-operator could also contract directly with a shipper and not need to be reclassified. And an independent contractor, if taken on as an employee, could also agree to use their own truck, if the company doesn’t have one, and be reimbursed.

In other words, the California trucking industry isn’t getting turned upside down just yet. But it will certainly be interesting to see if the old phrase “as California goes, so goes the country” holds true– if so, trucking associations should be prepared and make sure exemptions are written into future legislation.

Red Arrow Logistics has the scale and scope to meet the budget and schedule requirements of the largest and smallest companies alike. If we can be of assistance, please email me at [email protected] or give us a call 425-747-7914

Marshall Nachtman

Vice President of Sales

5 年

Liz we would like to haul for you in Washington State! www.washingtontransferinc.com

回复
Sam Prizler

Commercial Property & Casualty Broker at Marsh McLennan Agency

5 年

Harbor Trucking Association (out of the port of Los Angeles) is holding a meeting with "AB5 solutions" on October 30th @ 5pm. Excited to hear what they have to say!?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Liz Lasater的更多文章

  • Can E-Commerce Help Less-Than-Truckload Carriers In 2020?

    Can E-Commerce Help Less-Than-Truckload Carriers In 2020?

    The shipping industry has been challenged in recent years, both by e-commerce demands and inconsistencies in freight…

  • Improving Your Last Mile Delivery

    Improving Your Last Mile Delivery

    Retailers, shippers, carriers all need to create strategies to deal with the unprecedented growth in the e-commerce…

  • Will International Shipping Rates Rise In 2020?

    Will International Shipping Rates Rise In 2020?

    With a tumultuous 2019 within the shipping industry, many are wondering how the new year will play out with many global…

  • Shipping May Soon Be Included In The EU Emissions Trading System

    Shipping May Soon Be Included In The EU Emissions Trading System

    EU Emissions Trading System As the year draws to a close, the maritime sector is busily preparing to ensure adherence…

    1 条评论
  • Maritime Cybersecurity

    Maritime Cybersecurity

    Maritime Cybersecurity… A few years ago, a spate of attacks captured the world’s attention as Somali pirates hijacked…

  • Long-Term Effects Of The Trade War

    Long-Term Effects Of The Trade War

    It’s been a long and arduous journey, but at last, after 16 months of tension between the world’s two largest…

  • Removing Plastic From The Supply Chain

    Removing Plastic From The Supply Chain

    In the face of a burgeoning consumer movement against plastic packaging, retailers and manufacturers are ramping up…

  • IMO 2020 Costs Unclear – And That’s No Accident

    IMO 2020 Costs Unclear – And That’s No Accident

    On January 1, IMO regulations will come into effect and kick off a shift to lower sulfur marine fuels. The new…

  • Luxury Goods Rethink Supply Chains

    Luxury Goods Rethink Supply Chains

    On October 17, Trump attended a ribbon-cutting ceremony in a somewhat surreal place. He stood in the new 100,000 square…

  • IMO Considers Mandatory Slow Steaming. There’s A Better Option.

    IMO Considers Mandatory Slow Steaming. There’s A Better Option.

    At G7 this year, a surprising new voice spoke up in favor of mandatory slow steaming. French President Emmanuel Macron…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了