California’s community health systems can’t handle a minimum wage for workers

The following was a guest commentary published in CalMatters . Click here to read.

Gov. Gavin Newsom could sign Senate Bill 525 any day now, which will institute a minimum wage for?health care workers across the state. No one would be prouder than I to stand behind a pay increase for health care workers who devote their lives to care for others, especially during a major, personal health care crisis. That level of commitment was demonstrated over and over? again during the pandemic.?

However, SB 525 is another crushing blow for hospitals struggling in the inflation-laden, economic aftermath of COVID-19 without a commensurate increase in Medi-Cal and Medicare reimbursement rates. This is especially true for safety-net hospitals caring for high volumes of? patients insured by these government programs.??

Community Regional Medical Center has the second highest Medi-Cal and Medicaid hospital?patient discharges in the state, and ranks sixth in the nation. I am extremely proud of our 125-year history caring for underserved residents in the Central California region. But, I am?also perplexed by lawmakers who passed legislation that threatens struggling California hospitals and could reduce the very jobs this bill seeks to bolster.?

SB 525 will require hospital wages to progressively increase toward a $25 minimum?wage, beginning next June. By how much and how fast will depend on the size of the hospital, whether it’s part of a larger system and its volume of government insured patients.?

Sadly, nothing in the bill will help cover the cost of this new unfunded mandate. Medi-Cal and? Medicare reimbursements lag behind inflation and don’t cover the dramatically rising costs of? health care labor and supplies. Last year alone, Community Health System incurred a nearly $214 million shortfall in Medi-Cal and Medicare reimbursements even with supplemental? reimbursement streams aimed to minimize the strain for hospitals.

Medi-Cal and Medicare?cover only 88% of costs. When 84% of your patients are covered by one or both of these?programs, well, you can do the math.?

Our state government continues to expand Medi-Cal benefits, enforce unnecessary and? antiquated seismic requirements, and now institute a health care minimum wage, seemingly without regard for how hospitals will absorb the additional costs.?

The recent closure of Madera Community Hospital sent shockwaves throughout the state. Thankfully, Newsom and key legislators rallied to aid struggling hospitals. The Distressed Hospital Loan Program was established, and 17 hospitals benefitted from $300 million in no-interest?loans. However, a total of 30 California hospitals applied, requesting more than $900 million in?loans, and dozens more would have applied had small safety-net systems been eligible.?

The loan program was funded partly by the state’s renewed Managed Care Organization, or MCO, tax, which was deemed a “historic commitment to address the longstanding shortfall in Medi-Cal payments.” I hope that’s true. If it plays out the way legislators hope, the four-year MCO tax on health insurance plans will be federally?matched. It would also provide higher Medi-Cal reimbursement for emergency and outpatient services for California’s 334 general acute-care hospitals, and for graduate medical education training?programs.?

While this is welcomed relief, exactly how much funding is uncertain and comes with an? expiration date. None of the funding is intended for safety-net hospitals, and it does nothing to address decades of underfunding in the Medi-Cal?program. Despite the potential for the MCO tax, unfortunately, SB 525 would?eclipse whatever providers receive from one-time, no-interest loans or temporary funding mechanisms.??

If the governor signs SB 525, the Newsom administration and any legislator with a?safety-net hospital in their district must also champion an equally meaningful and sustainable increase in Medi-Cal funding. Otherwise, I fear more hospitals will buckle under the weight of unfunded? mandates, and underfunded and over extended government programs – ultimately reducing? access to care and threatening the jobs that help provide it.