Cable rating with multi-layer backfills

Cable rating with multi-layer backfills

Cableizer proudly announces the release of the multi-layer backfill method as a part of our buried module, according to de Lieto Vollaro et.al (see references below) including the following improvements:

  • Selection of materials for backfill areas. Choose between 'concrete', 'sand', 'gravel and stone', 'fine soil material', and 'other material'. This selection is also available for standard backfills and has currently only a visual impact on the preview.
  • Validation and inclusion in Cableizer test cases.
  • Updated documentation with method and parameter descriptions.

It is possible to place cables and heat sources both outside and inside of the multi-layer backfill, though never inside the middle or top layer.

Method

According to de Lieto Vollaro et.al (see references below), the thermal resistance of a multi-layer backfill, named R_CG, is calculated by dividing the heat flow into three different paths as shown below in red.

No alt text provided for this image

Thermal resistances

The first heat path Φ1 consists of the thermal resistances R11R12, and R13, the second path Φ2 of R21 and R22, and the third path Φ3 of R31 and R32.

The thermal resistances for the three different paths are then calculated for both the left side and the right side (they are identical if the source is located in the center of the backfill), and the resulting thermal resistance is calculated by taking those values in parallel.

Constants

This method is based on fitting the thermal resistances to numerical data from finite element simulations. De Lieto Vollaro et.al defined equations for thermal resistances of different elements in the heat paths. The equations use the constants C1 to C7 which were defined in the papers. As a consequence, the method is limited to specific conditions.

Range of validity

Cableizer verifies that the multi-layer backfill arrangement is within the following limits of parameter variability. If the values are outside this range, Cableizer displays a warning. However, it is still possible to run simulations, but result may be implausible.

No alt text provided for this image

Validation

For validation, the ampacity for one single-core cable with a limiting temperature of 90 °C was calculated according to the arrangement in the figure above. Validation is based on simulating directly buried (Case A), standard backfill according to IEC 60287-2-1 Ed. 1.2 (Case B), and multi-layer backfill (Case C) for the same conditions.

No alt text provided for this image

For Case 1 the thermal resistivity of soil and all three backfill layers is the same and equal to 1.0 K.m/W, which should result in the same ampacity independent of the calculation method. This is almost correct with a difference of only 0.1 % for the multi-layer backfill method as compared to the other two methods (which inherently have the same result).

For Case 2 the thermal resistivity of the backfill has been reduced to 0.7 K.m/W, while all surrounding soil has an unchanged thermal resistivity. In this case the difference between the two methods is 0.2 % which is a very good agreement with consideration to the nature of the multi-layer backfill method. The ampacity is as expected increased due to the decrease in thermal resistivity of the backfill.

When the top and middle layers are filled with higher thermal resistivity material of 1.5 K.m/W (Case 3C), the ampacity is as expected decreasing compared to Case 2C. The ampacity does further decrease when the top layer is modelled as a street with a even higher thermal resistivity of 2.5 K.m/W (Case 4C). These numbers look all reasonable in relation to each other. Unfortunately, the two reference publications do not include similar case studies for comparison.

References

R. de Lieto Vollaro, L. Fontana, A. Vallati, 'Thermal analysis of underground electrical power cables buried in non-homogeneous soils', Applied Thermal Engineering 31, 2011, p. 772-778

R. de Lieto Vollaro, L. Fontana, A. Vallati, 'Experimental study of thermal field deriving from an underground electrical power cable buried in non-homogeneous soils', Applied Thermal Engineering 62, 2014, p. 390-397


Cableizer - The Online Cable Optimizer

Model power cables and calculate current rating, magnetic fields, electrical parameters, short-circuit currents, pulling forces... Experience the full potential of our browser-based simulation platform cableizer.com! Our 14-day free trial includes full access to all the simulation features of Cableizer.

David Scott

Lead Asset Lifecycle Engineer

3 年

Impressive. A specialised user interface around cable construction wrapped around FEA has the potential to be very useful. I'm less involved in ratings now than I used to be, but I'll mention this to a few folks that still are.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了