To Buy Or Not To Buy, That's The Question

To Buy or Build: A Strategic Approach to Lowering IT Debt

IT leaders and architects face a fundamental question with almost every new project: Should we build this solution in-house, or should we buy an off-the-shelf product? The answer isn’t always clear-cut, but making the wrong choice could cost your company more than just money: it could increase your IT debt and slow down innovation.

Let's explore a strategic and practical approach to navigating the "buy vs. build" dilemma, helping you make informed decisions that not only solve your business problems but also reduce long-term IT debt (also see this article to learn more about IT debt).

1. The Buy vs. Build Dilemma: What’s at Stake?

Before diving into the pros and cons, it’s important to understand what’s really at stake. Every IT decision either adds to or reduces your IT debt. Here’s how each option can affect you:

• Building in-house: You get full control and customization but may also inherit a long-term maintenance burden.
• Buying off-the-shelf: You avoid development costs but could end up locked into a vendor's roadmap and future price hikes.

This decision impacts not only your immediate budget but also your future flexibility, operational complexity, and innovation speed. Let’s break it down further.

2. The Strategic Perspective: How to Decide

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer to the build vs. buy question, but a strategic framework can help guide the decision.

a. Core vs. Context

A great starting point is distinguishing between "core" and "context" activities in your business:

• Core: These are the activities and systems that give your company a competitive advantage. If it’s core, it might make sense to build, as you’ll want full control over how it evolves.
• Context: These are necessary for your business to function but aren’t a differentiator. Context systems are prime candidates for off-the-shelf solutions.

For example, a retail company's custom recommendation engine might be core, while payroll software is context.

b. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

Both building and buying come with costs beyond the initial price tag. When making your decision, consider the following TCO elements:

• Build: Initial development, ongoing maintenance, future upgrades, and team resources.
• Buy: Licensing, vendor lock-in, integration complexity, and support costs.

c. Flexibility vs. Speed

• Building: Offers long-term flexibility to customize and adapt, but you’ll pay for that flexibility with slower time-to-market.
• Buying: Provides speed to deploy, but you’ll be constrained by the vendor’s roadmap and potentially a lack of customization options.

Weighing flexibility against speed is critical in understanding which choice best serves your business in the long run.

3. Reducing IT Debt: A Key Consideration

Building the wrong system can leave you with massive IT debt, as can buying a system that doesn’t integrate well. Here’s how to ensure your decision reduces rather than increases IT debt:

a. Build When It’s Core, But Keep It Lean

When building internally, focus on building modular, scalable solutions that can be easily adapted as technology evolves. Avoid over-customization, which can make future upgrades more difficult and costly.

b. Buy When It’s Context, But Evaluate Vendor Debt

Even when buying off-the-shelf solutions, there’s the risk of "vendor debt"—where you’re locked into a vendor’s ecosystem, making future integrations or migrations difficult. Choose vendors with a strong track record for innovation and openness.

c. Integrations: The Hidden Cost of Complexity

Whether you build or buy, the ability of your new system to integrate seamlessly with your existing tech stack is critical. Poor integrations increase IT debt by adding complexity and maintenance overhead.

4. Practical Framework: When to Buy, When to Build

To make the decision-making process more hands-on, here’s a checklist IT leaders and architects can use when evaluating whether to buy or build:

Build If:

• The solution is critical to your competitive advantage.
• You need complete control over the solution’s evolution.
• The off-the-shelf solutions don’t meet your unique business needs.
• Your internal team has the expertise to maintain and scale the system.

Buy If:

• The solution addresses a "context" activity, not a core business function.
• There’s a strong, established product that meets 80-90% of your needs.
• You need a solution fast to respond to market demands.
• Your internal team is already stretched thin with other critical projects.

5. The Hybrid Approach: Build on Top of Bought Solutions

Sometimes the answer isn’t purely to build or buy but a combination of both. For example, you might buy an off-the-shelf solution for the core functionality but build custom integrations or modules on top of it to meet your specific needs.

This hybrid approach lets you leverage the speed and reliability of commercial software while retaining the flexibility to innovate in the areas that matter most.

Making Smart Decisions to Lower IT Debt

The "build vs. buy" question is a crucial decision for every IT leader. Get it wrong, and you’ll be stuck with higher IT debt, maintenance headaches, and slower innovation. Get it right, and you’ll not only deliver a solution that meets today’s needs but also set your company up for long-term success.

By using a strategic framework—focusing on core vs. context, evaluating TCO, and keeping an eye on IT debt—you can make smarter decisions that support innovation while minimizing technical baggage.

Subscribe to Autom8 to receive more digital transformation insights like this.