If Businesses Are Trying To 'Humanise', Why Are They Doing It With Robots?
Adam Ferrier
Founder of MSIX / DOA /Thinkerbell (Campaign’s Global Agency of the Year (2nd)). Author / speaker / radio and podcast host. Consumer psychologist
Recent I asked LinkedIn what 'humanizing' business / telcos / energy / finance etc actually means. The insights from the responses fed into this article published in the Huffington Post. Here's the article below.
_____________________________________________________________________
"I'm guessing a few of you have already identified a key flaw (or at least a somewhat ironic detail) in this 'humanising' trend."
So SXSW is on this week -- oh, you knew? Let me guess: smashed-avocado-loving, millennial start-up tycoon, right?
For the rest of us, SXSW is where the world's hippest, most creative, and tech-advanced people gather to stroke each other's egos as they inspire each other with what's next. This tech love-fest is happening in Austin, Texas, right now, and guess what the biggest trend of the year is: 'humanising businesses'. That's right -- businesses are trying to become more human.
Back in Australia, in my day job as an advertising practitioner, over the past few months I've heard banks talk about wanting to 'humanise banking', energy companies wanting to 'humanise energy', telcos wanting to 'humanise telcos', and of course insurance giants talk of 'humanising insurance'.
But it doesn't stop there.
Go into any design or branding agency and they're busily asking their clients to buy into 'human-centred design', which my design-geek buddies tell me is 'putting the human at the heart of the design process and designing around their needs -- not those of the companies.
Isn't it an admission that you've been doing it wrong all of these years? Doesn't it mean you've put your business interests ahead of the human's interest for years?
Now, I'm guessing a few of you have already identified a key flaw (or at least a somewhat ironic detail) in this 'humanising' trend, in that it's happening at exactly the same time that many companies are looking at ways of stripping humans out of their internal processes and delivery mechanisms and replacing them with 'non-human alternatives' such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and chat-bots (computer programs that simulate a conversation so it feels like you're talking to a (somewhat demented) human, whereas you're actually just talking to an algorithm.
However, I have two further and equally important gripes with businesses humanising themselves. Firstly, isn't it an admission that you've been doing it wrong all of these years? Doesn't it mean you've put your business interests ahead of the human's interest for years?
Many industries have had it safe for so long, and now with new tech-enabled competitors they realise they've been greedy and lethargic for a long time (now that's human!).
If you truly were humanising your business, or focused on human-centred design, then sometimes it would mean you would choose to leave the consumer alone, and not offer them anything.
In many categories, businesses that have gorged in the trough of regulated markets, cosy oligopolies, or taken advantage of consumer inertia and our inherent status quo bias (that is, no matter how high the fees and how much the keyboard outrage people rarely vote with their feet, it's better the devil you know) should start their humanising process with a simple apology. 'Gee, sorry about that -- we were taking the piss a bit there. We'll try and act a bit more fairly from now on.'
Imagine if a corporation said that! Greed is human, to admit it is divine.
And my final beef with humanising is this, if you truly designed your product or brand around consumer needs, what would happen? Technology now has the ability to wrap services around a consumer and make things decidedly easier for people to do whatever it is that these companies want them to do. However, I'm not entirely sure this qualifies as 'humanising' anything. The business does not become more human, it just makes its products easier to consume.
If you truly were humanising your business, or focused on human-centred design, then sometimes it would mean you would choose to leave the consumer alone, and not offer them anything. You may decide they don't need another widget, they don't require another alternative to the already cluttered category you play in.
Sometimes being human-centred would involve just leaving the human alone, but where's the business model in that?
Hopefully that's something the hipsters at SXSW can work out next year.
275K+ Users, £75m+ Food Orders | CEO, OrderDigital.co.uk – Empowering Independent UK Takeaways
7 年Good article, when it comes to AI and chatbots, the answer isn't to use them to offer a more humanised experience, it's to offer a better experience and seek ways to do so. There are a lot of things a bot and AI can do better than a human, likewise humans are better at some things than bots, combine them to do what they are both great at.
Multi-disciplined troubleshooter and straight talker. Passionate for Systems Thinking/Dynamics.
7 年Its easier to humanise robots by simply telling (programming) them what to do. Robots don't argue back, humans do. We, the management, always take the easy path, hence we choose robots.
--Marketing Executive for an organic/non-toxic Wellness Company.
7 年So many people need jobs & they keep making robots to take the place of humans doing the work. How are people supposed to make a living?
Solving sales challenges.
7 年The psychological definition of "human centred" versus a corporate version of "human centred" are markedly different. But how? Carl Rogers' Person-centred therapy is all about unconditional personal regard for the client and their circumstances from the therapist; corporations say the customer is always right. But that parallel is shortlived because but unlike (most) psychologists, do corporates ACTUALLY mean it? No. Genuineness and authenticity are key to the success of client. Most psychologists run their practice to the betterment of the client and the money important but generally secondary. However, for the corporate, the shareholder of recent times is the big focus, so authenticity and genuineness pivot sometimes for corporates into disingenuous because you always know, everything that is done for you is with the single objective of retaining or upselling your business. And that is business. Where a Corporate could gain pure authenticity and genuineness is through strategic partnerships with organisations that simply exist to improve the lives of people. There are thousands of worthy not for profits in this country and whilst some corporates are doing a wonderful job outsourcing their "human-centred" approach, some are failing miserably. Or even worse, investing in bots and not even trying!
Content Creator
7 年Loved this article Adam - the eternal conundrum. One I find myself constantly battling with.