Business Model: "BAIT & HOOK" (aka "RAZOR & BLADE")

?? PRICING MODEL pattern ??

Prologue

The Razor and Blade (or Bait and Hook) business model is a powerful strategy that has revolutionized various industries by offering a core product at a low price or even for free, while generating profits through the sale of complementary products or services. This model, pioneered by companies like Gillette and later adopted by tech giants and consumer goods manufacturers, focuses on building customer loyalty and creating long-term revenue streams.

As described in (Dhebar, 2016), the razor-and-blade pricing strategy is based on five factors:

1. First and foremost, razor-and-blades pricing should be informed by the marketer's strategic intent rather than a short-term profit-maximizing strategy. Several examples of strategies that drive a razor-and-blade pricing model are: To establish a strong launch board for complementary products. To reinforce the bundling of products and prevent mixing and matching. To win the platform standard wars.
2. Secondly, the complement sets must be able to offer razor-and-blades pricing based on financial resources, product-design feasibility, and/or operational capability.
3. Thirdly, keeping the price of durable hardware low creates an incentive for the consumer to purchase ongoing consumables in the future.
4. Fourth, razor-and-blades pricing only works if the consumer, after being lured into purchasing the durable component, is locked into the platform. It is possible to achieve effective customer lock-in through a variety of mechanisms, including consumer emotions, consumer behavior, contractual terms, and proprietary interference.
5. The fifth and final point, razor-and-blades pricing requires a competitive context that supports it: The marketer must be able to lock in customers to purchase high-price consumables when they have adopted the low-price durable component, and the marketer must also be able to prevent competitors from offering their own variations of consumables.

?? Key Takeaways

1. Low-Cost Entry Point: The model offers a basic product at a bargain price to attract customers and lower barriers to entry. Core product sold at or below cost. Builds initial customer base quickly.
2. Revenue Generation through Complementary Products: Profits are primarily derived from the sale of high-margin complementary products or services. Recurring revenue from consumables or add-ons. Higher profit margins on complementary items.
3. Customer Lock-In: The strategy aims to create customer loyalty and dependence on the ecosystem of products. Proprietary designs or patents to prevent competition. Brand loyalty encourages continued purchases.
4. Cross-Subsidization: The low-cost core product is subsidized by the profits from complementary items. Initial losses on core product offset by future gains. Long-term profitability focus.
5. Versatility Across Industries: The model has been successfully adapted in various sectors, from consumer goods to technology. Applicable in both B2C and B2B contexts. Adaptable to different product types and markets.

?? Implementation

To successfully implement the Razor and Blade business model:

1. Identify a core product with potential for recurring complementary purchases
2. Price the core product attractively, even at a loss if necessary
3. Develop high-quality, proprietary complementary products
4. Create barriers to prevent customers from using competitors' complementary products
5. Focus on building brand loyalty and customer relationships

?? Questions to guide you

1. How will you prevent competitors from copying your service or spare parts business?
2. Can we protect our after-sales business with features and functionalities created in the product design phase?
3. Can unique, hard-to-imitate, or digital add-on components stop our competitors from copying our service or spare part businesses?
4. Is it possible to defend our after-sales business through the incorporation of features and functionalities in the product design phase, such as a remote diagnostic device that necessitates servicing by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM)?
5. How would XYZ company manage our business?

?? Real-world examples of successful implementation include:

• Gillette: Offers razors at low prices, generating profits from blade sales.
• HP and other printer manufacturers: Sell printers cheaply, make money on ink cartridges.
• Nespresso: Provides coffee machines at competitive prices, profits from coffee capsule sales.
• Sony PlayStation and Microsoft Xbox: Sell gaming consoles at near-cost, generate revenue from game sales and subscriptions.
• Amazon Kindle: Offers e-readers at low prices, profits from e-book sales.

?? Challenges to Implementation

• Balancing initial losses on core products with long-term profitability.
• Developing and protecting proprietary complementary products.
• Maintaining customer loyalty in the face of competing alternatives.
• Adapting to changing consumer preferences and technological advancements.
• Managing inventory and supply chain for both core and complementary products.

?? Bottom Line

The Razor and Blade business model offers a powerful strategy for companies to build a large customer base quickly and generate sustainable, long-term revenue streams. By offering an attractive entry point with a low-cost core product, businesses can create customer loyalty and drive profits through the sale of high-margin complementary items.

While this model requires careful planning and execution, it has proven successful across various industries, from consumer goods to technology. For entrepreneurs and startups, the Razor and Blade model presents an opportunity to disrupt markets, build strong customer relationships, and create lasting competitive advantages. However, success depends on the ability to create value, protect intellectual property, and continuously innovate to stay ahead of competitors.

PROFESSIONAL: I conduct academic research by interviewing CEOs of small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) in Japan, known as Japanese Global Niche Top (aka "Hidden Champion").

• I am also conducting a holistic four-year study that examines the growing entrepreneurial ecosystem in Japan, which includes interviews with startups, incubators, accelerators, studios, living labs, venture capitalists, and government officials (to date, individuals have been interviewed in Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto, and Hiroshima).

PERSONAL: I am a polymath and love all types of topics typically reading 2-3 books each week. Now, I have a chance to share my insights with readers!

References

Abdelkafi, N., Makhotin, S., & Posselt, T. (2013). Business model innovations for electric mobility—what can be learned from existing business model patterns?. International journal of innovation management, 17(01), 1340003.

Balasubrahmanyam, S., & Sethi, D. (2024). Strategic variants of the razor and blade business model: an inspiring benchmark. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(8), 2521-2546.

Dhebar, A. (2016). Razor-and-Blades pricing revisited. Business Horizons, 59(3), 303-310.

Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., & Csik, M. (2014). Revolutionizing the business model. Management of the fuzzy front end of innovation, 89-97.

Gassmann, Oliver, Frankenberger, Karolin, & Csik, Michaela. (2020). The business model navigator?: the strategies behind the most successful companies (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Limited.

Giesen, E., Berman, S. J., Bell, R., & Blitz, A. (2007). Three ways to successfully innovate your business model. Strategy & leadership, 35(6), 27-33.

Homann, F., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. (2016). Capturing value from razor and blade business models.

Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2006). Business model. In Astute Competition (Vol. 11, pp. 53-72). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Linz, C., Müller-Stewens, G., & Zimmermann, A. (2017). Radical business model transformation: Gaining the competitive edge in a disruptive world. Kogan Page Publishers.

Magretta, J. (2002). 2 The Business Model. Harvard business review.

Mishra, C. S., & Mishra, C. S. (2015). Business Model Design. Getting Funded: Proof-of-Concept, Due Diligence, Risk and Reward, 103-135.

Remané, G., Hanelt, A., Tesch, J. F., & Kolbe, L. M. (2019). The business model pattern database: a tool for systematic BMI. Business Model Innovation in the Era of the Internet of Things: Studies on the Aspects of Evaluation, Decision Making and Tooling, 89-144.

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.

van Vliet, H. (2014). The added value of business models.

von Rosing, M., von Scheel, H., & Rosenberg, A. (2015). Importance of Business Model. The Complete Business Process Handbook, 2.

Zoet, M., Smit, K., & de Haan, E. (2014). Business Model for Business Rules.

Fair Use Disclaimer:

This review includes excerpts from the above references. These excerpts are used under the doctrine of fair use, as outlined in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, for purposes of criticism, commentary, and education. All rights to the original content belong to the authors and publishers. No copyright infringement is intended.