Enterprise Architecture Series: Business Capability Integration
Introduction:
A business strategy is a plan of action that outlines how a company intends to achieve its goals and objectives. It involves identifying the company's target customers, defining the value proposition that the company offers, and determining how the company will differentiate itself from competitors.
To marry CX (Customer Experience), EA (Enterprise Architecture), BPM (Business Process Management), and PMO (Project Management Office) in agile ways of working, a company needs to adopt an integrated approach that aligns these functions with its overall business strategy.
It is important to note that any integration that involves significant change, such as integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working, can face challenges and obstacles along the way. It is important to carefully assess the readiness of the organisation and allocate sufficient resources to mitigate potential risks and ensure the project's success. Additionally, it is crucial to engage stakeholders across the organisation and communicate effectively to build support and drive adoption. Therefore, to thoroughly evaluate the risks, benefits and resource requirements, before making a decision to proceed. It is also important to consider any potential drawbacks or limitations of the proposed integration and explore alternative solutions or approaches as needed.
Challenge:
In the absence of an overall alignment, an organisation may encounter several challenges:
Inconsistent customer experiences: When CX and other functions are not aligned, it can lead to inconsistent experiences for customers. For example, if the sales and support teams have different processes and tools, it can lead to confusion and frustration for customers.
Siloed decision-making: When EA, BPM, and PMO are not aligned, it can lead to siloed decision-making and lack of collaboration. This can result in missed opportunities and inefficiencies in the organisation.
Inefficient processes: When BPM and PMO are not aligned, it can result in inefficient processes that waste time and resources. For example, if the project management process is not integrated with the business process management process, it can lead to duplication of effort and unnecessary delays.
Lack of visibility and insights: When CX, EA, BPM, and PMO are not aligned, it can be difficult to get a comprehensive view of the organisation's performance. This can make it difficult to identify areas for improvement and make data-driven decisions.
Culture and skills mismatch: When CX, EA, BPM, and PMO are not aligned, it can result in a culture and skills mismatch within the organisation. This can make it difficult to attract and retain top talent and can lead to low morale and high turnover.
Lack of alignment between CX, EA, BPM, and PMO can lead to a range of challenges that can negatively impact an organisation's performance and competitiveness. It is important for organisations to recognise the importance of alignment and take steps to address any misalignments.
Analysis:
CX involves understanding customer needs and expectations and designing products and services that meet those needs. EA involves defining the company's overall business, information, application, technology, and infrastructure strategy. BPM involves optimising business processes to improve efficiency and effectiveness. PMO involves overseeing project management activities to ensure that projects are delivered on time, within budget, and with the desired quality.
Customer experience is a critical aspect of a company's business strategy as it directly impacts customer satisfaction and loyalty. To incorporate CX into agile ways of working, companies can adopt the following practices:
2. Enterprise Architecture (EA):
Enterprise architecture involves defining the business, information, application, technology infrastructure, and systems that support a company's business processes. To incorporate EA into agile ways of working, companies can adopt the following practices:
3. Business Process Management (BPM):
Business process management involves optimising business processes to improve efficiency and effectiveness. To incorporate BPM into agile ways of working, companies can adopt the following practices:
4. Project Management Office (PMO):
Project management involves overseeing the delivery of projects to ensure that they are completed on time, within budget, and with the desired quality. To incorporate PMO into agile ways of working, companies can adopt the following practices:
Value Analysis:
Advantages of integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working include improved customer experience, increased efficiency, and faster time-to-market, while disadvantages may include resistance to change, cultural barriers, and technical complexity.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
The alignment of CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working can lead to better business performance, increased competitiveness, and improved customer satisfaction, resulting in a stronger market position and increased profitability while there are also potential disadvantages or challenges to consider. Companies must carefully evaluate their organisational readiness, needs and resources before embarking on this type of integration to ensure that it is a good fit for their business strategy and objectives.
An agile approach to integrating these functions involves continuous collaboration and feedback loops between the different teams responsible for each area. This approach enables companies to respond quickly to changing market conditions and customer needs while ensuring that all activities are aligned with the company's overall strategic goals.
Readiness Assessment:
Before integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working, companies can perform a readiness assessment to evaluate their readiness for the integration. Here are some potential readiness assessments:
Culture and leadership: Assess the company's culture and leadership to determine whether there is a willingness and commitment to support the integration. This includes evaluating the company's willingness to adopt new ways of working and whether leaders are willing to support and promote the integration.
Technology infrastructure: Evaluate the company's technology infrastructure to ensure that it is capable of supporting the integration. This includes assessing the technology systems currently in use and identifying any gaps or limitations that may need to be addressed.
Process maturity: Assess the company's process maturity to determine whether current processes are well-defined, repeatable, and measurable. This includes evaluating the company's ability to define and manage processes and identifying areas that may need improvement.
Employee skills and training: Evaluate employee skills and training to determine whether they have the necessary skills and training to support the integration. This includes assessing employee readiness to work in an agile environment and identifying any gaps in skills or knowledge that may need to be addressed.
Stakeholder engagement: Assess stakeholder engagement to determine whether there is sufficient engagement and support from stakeholders, including customers, suppliers, and partners. This includes evaluating stakeholder readiness to adopt new ways of working and identifying any barriers to engagement.
A readiness assessment can help companies identify potential challenges and areas for improvement before embarking on an integration of CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working. By addressing these challenges and gaps, companies can improve their chances of success and ensure that the integration is aligned with their business strategy and objectives.
Implementation roadmap:
Phase 1: Planning (2-4 weeks)
Define project objectives and scope, including functions to be integrated, impacted processes, and desired outcomes.
Phase 2: Design (4-6 weeks)
Phase 3: Implementation (12-24 weeks)
Phase 4: Evaluation (2-4 weeks)
The estimated timeframe for this project is approximately 20-36 weeks, depending on the complexity of the integration and the size of the organisation. However, it is important to note that the timeline may vary based on individual factors and circumstances. It is recommended to monitor progress against the project plan regularly to ensure the project stays on track and to make any necessary adjustments as needed.
Executive Sponsorship:
The CEO can certainly be a good executive sponsor for a project that involves integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working. As the most senior leader in the organisation, the CEO has the authority to make strategic decisions and allocate resources to support the integration effort. In addition, the CEO can help to set the vision for the project, communicate its importance to stakeholders at all levels of the organisation, and ensure that it aligns with the overall goals and priorities of the company.
However, it is important to note that the CEO's involvement in the project will depend on several factors, such as the size of the organisation, the complexity of the integration effort, and the CEO's availability and level of expertise in the relevant areas. In some cases, it may be more appropriate for another senior leader, such as the COO or CIO, to act as the executive sponsor and take the lead on the integration effort.
Ultimately, the most important factor in selecting an executive sponsor for the project is finding someone who has the right mix of skills, experience, and authority to lead the integration effort and ensure its success. This may or may not be the CEO, depending on the specific circumstances of the organisation and the project.
Skills and resources:
While all the resources required for the success of a project that involves integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working are important, the most important resource for the project is people.
The cross-functional team that drives the integration effort is critical to the project's success. The team should have a mix of technical and business skills, as well as a deep understanding of CX, EA, BPM, and PMO. The team members should be committed to working collaboratively and be able to communicate effectively across functional boundaries.
Additionally, the project team will need to engage with stakeholders across the organisation, including executive sponsors, business leaders, and other employees. Effective stakeholder management requires strong communication and relationship-building skills, which are also people-dependent.
The success of the project depends on the organisation's ability to embrace a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, which is largely driven by people. Agile ways of working require a mindset shift, and the project team will need to work closely with the organisation to help employees adapt to new ways of working.
Therefore, while technology, budget, time, and executive support are all important resources for the success of the project, people are the most important resource. Without the right people, the project is unlikely to succeed, regardless of the other resources available.
Risks:
The best time to start a project that involves integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working is when there is a clear business need, the organisation is ready for change, the necessary resources are available, and the effort aligns with the organisation's strategic goals and priorities however, there are ongoing risks to manage.
Resistance to change: The biggest risks associated with any organisational change is resistance from employees. Integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working will likely require significant changes to the way people work, and some employees may be resistant to these changes.
Lack of alignment: Another risk is that the different functions may not be aligned in terms of goals, processes, and tools, making it difficult to integrate them effectively. Misalignment can result in inefficiencies, duplication of effort, and lack of collaboration.
Integration complexity: Integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO in agile ways of working can be a complex and time-consuming process. The integration effort may involve multiple teams, processes, and tools, which can create challenges in terms of coordination and project management.
Technology limitations: Technology limitations can also be a risk, particularly if the organisation's current technology infrastructure is not able to support the integration effort. This may require additional investment in new tools or systems, which can be costly and time-consuming.
Lack of executive support: Finally, a lack of executive support can be a major risk for any organisational change effort. Without strong leadership and support from senior leaders, the integration effort may not receive the resources and attention it needs to be successful.
To mitigate these risks, it is important to have a clear project plan, with defined goals, timelines, and milestones. It is also important to engage stakeholders at all levels of the organisation and communicate the benefits of the integration effort. Effective change management strategies, including training and support for employees, can also help to minimise resistance and ensure a smooth transition. Finally, it is important to have strong executive support and leadership to ensure that the integration effort is given the resources and attention it needs to succeed.
Conclusion:
In summary, integrating CX, EA, BPM, and PMO into agile ways of working involves a holistic approach that prioritises customer needs, aligns technology systems with business goals, optimises business processes, and ensures effective project management. By adopting these practices, companies can create a more integrated and responsive approach to business strategy, which can lead to better customer satisfaction, increased efficiency, and improved business performance, and therefore, bottom line.
Join our 10th Anniversary at B2B Global Conference on 25th of October at Parramatta | Up to 50 exibitors | 10 plus sponsor | 200+ Attendees
1 年Mobin, thanks for sharing!
Business Development | Coaching | Mentoring | Leadership | Future Thinking
1 年Great article Mobin Barati. I believe you nailed it 90 % of the way. You're looking at systems and processes and I believe the last 10 % towards the goal is about individuals. Not just their skills and resources. But their mindset and willingness to work in an unordered domain. Where complexity is high and sometimes even chaotic. It's also about vulnerability of individuals (ex. psychological safety and radical transparency/truths).
Cybersecurity Transformation, Artificial Intelligence, Automation Uplift Specialist | Business, Process & Technology Transformation | Project and Program Delivery Principal | Lean Six Sigma & Operational Excellence
1 年You covered it really well Mobin Barati thanks for sharing!
Project Management Professional - Digital Transformation
1 年Very good article and well articulated with specifics and more importantly roadmap for implementation. Mobin Barati