Business can and must make a difference in the fight against corruption
Klaus Moosmayer
Member of the Executive Committee and Chief Ethics, Risk and Compliance Officer of Novartis, Board Member of SwissHoldings and Business@OECD
Today we mark the 15th anniversary of the Adoption of the UN Convention against Corruption. What has changed since then? Is there more corruption, more misbehavior in the world? Indicators like the Corruption Perception Index do not give a clear answer. Today, there is much more transparency as the world has become connected through the internet and the rise of social media. We have to keep in mind that 15 years ago there was no iPhone and no Twitter. And even Facebook was founded a couple of months after the Convention against Corruption was adopted.
Today more than 2.5 billion people are connected worldwide through social media networks, exchanging messages, pictures and news. If you search for #corruption you will get hundreds of tweets every day. A Google search on corruption results in more than 55 million search hits, only slightly less than the search term “World Cup.” Why do I mention this? The digitally connected world and the social media reach could lead to the impression that there is even more corruption. I don’t know if that’s true, but I do know it is more difficult for bad actors to hide. And this is positive.
But there is a flip side of this coin. There is a risk that fake news and the misuse of social media lead to premature decisions and judgments. We need to be aware of this risk and remind ourselves that the rule of law is of paramount importance in fighting corruption.
This fight can only be effective if all stakeholders join forces. That means in particular a close cooperation and partnership of the public and the private sector. I am very honored to be part of this most important High Level Debate of the UN General Assembly to mark the 15th anniversary of UNCAC as a representative of the private sector.
I am speaking on behalf of a company which employs around 380,000 employees from all member states of the United Nations. I represent a company, Siemens, which lived through a major corruption scandal more than ten years ago and made a clear commitment to fight corruption going forward.
Are we perfect? No. Can a big organization - private or public - ever be totally immune against misconduct? I believe no. But I also strongly believe that we as a business can and must make a difference in the fight against corruption: A clear tone from the top, effective Compliance systems and collaboration with public sector and civil society.
To be effective, we need ongoing dialogue and acknowledgement for our efforts. Voluntary self disclosure by companies of internally detected misconduct and compliance efforts must be rewarded. Because it would be a severe mistake to punish companies that effectively detect corruption in order to be transparent and honest - and to protect by this behavior the ones that are silent about their problems. This honesty in the discussion is of utmost importance. We expect International institutions, NGOs, journalists etc. to support this approach. If not, hiding issues will be rewarded.
Living and enforcing this collaboration between all the stakeholders can be a game changer in the fight against corruption, I am grateful to the UN and its Convention to be a driver of such a collaboration.
IPSAS, Project Management, Requirements Analysis, User Acceptance Testing, Training
6 年I agree with your point of view. However, as we continue to be capitalist societies where profit overrides all other interests, corruption will continue to occur in one form or another
CEO
6 年Totaly agreed pointview , commercial community must endorse the best way of engaging the society instead of empowering the corruption. ????
Project Manager at Mjs Gener
6 年The fight against Corruption is a miss match. More money more work and no results.
Project Manager at Mjs Gener
6 年Up and Until Government. UN, enforce constitutional reform , to all Nations ,Anti Corruption is a toothless dog.Bark and no bite. Only issues and ideas. Total waste of finance and energy.
Nothing has changed since the inception of Anti Corruption, it has become worst. Western world calls it donations and the third world countries call it corruption. which is worst? This gives the western world a tool to blame the third world of bad governance practices. Look around you, when Russia, Saudi Arabia, China, Qatar, and many more countries gave donations to the Republican Party and or Trump, the rules and laws changed for them; And what would you call it???? The World has different forms of corruption, we need to classify the impact of it on the general population. Take for example the Health Insurance Companies, Medication and the most common is N R A. This impacts even school going children. The Politics is controlled by NRA through its donations. WHAT HAPPENED TO ANTI CORRUPTION? This is all acceptable because its called DONATIONS.