The Bumpy Road to Smart Systems Adoption

The Bumpy Road to Smart Systems Adoption

For every gain in the Smart Systems arena we see, there seems to be five more obstacles and misunderstood opportunities.?On the technology supply side, platforms, infrastructure and marketing promises alone will not auto-convert into successful customer solutions.?For the adopters – equipment and machine manufacturers, and end users – trying to address these new emergent opportunities with traditional risk “reductionist” processes and clueless IT organizations under siege will not drive home runs or move you around the bases.

No alt text provided for this image

Everyone in the Smart Systems and Services arena seems to be stuck these days.?Stuck in a proof of concept; stuck trying to get leadership to invest; stuck trying to get past the “platform” to create real customer value creation; stuck trying to figure out how to wire together these over complicated multi-vendor solutions – stuck, stuck, stuck!

Perhaps, we need to be thinking about all this differently?

SMART SYSTEMS FINALLY TAKES THE FIELD

This is a story about the continuing saga of Smart Systems adoption, but it’s not a story about technology per se. The basic tech—think of it as the pipes or plumbing—of the connected products and machine world has been in place for many years now. The water—data—is being channeled through that plumbing every day, from connected sensors in home devices and vehicles all the way up to massive industrial machines.

But what subsequently happens to that flow of data is often a different matter altogether. We are now in the third decade of the 21st?century and the vast majority of sensor data still goes unharvested, unanalyzed, and often completely ignored by a huge percentage of businesses around the world. How can it be that our leaders continue to shun the very intelligence that could optimize their processes and lead them to much greater success in the marketplace?

No alt text provided for this image

Part of the answer is that raw sensor data is not in itself actionable business information. It requires a complex process of normalization, filtering, fusion with other data sets, and serious analysis in order to become?useful for business decisions. Fair enough, but here too the techniques have long existed to make this transformation. We live, after all, in the era of “big data.”

Perhaps applying these techniques costs too much money, or the sheer volume of sensor-data is too heavy to be crunched for business purposes?

No, not really. There is always a cost, of course, but the benefits are usually crystal clear. And if the data-stream seems too heavy to be useful, companies should come up with better questions for those data to answer.

Here at Harbor Research, we have said more times than we can count that technologies need to be both mature and well aligned to open the path to progress. When either of those qualities is missing you can count on seeing hacks, kludges and proprietary Band Aids used to bridge the gap, with a temporary net benefit and a bigger clean-up job than you had before they were applied.

We now have that magic blend of?mature and well-aligned technologies?across many verticals, yet most of our raw data might as well not exist. This is why we insist that the perennial failure of IIoT to “get off the ground” isn’t a technology story at all. It’s much more a story about business models and business maturity—or, sad to say, the lack of them.

THE BUMPY ROAD TO DIGITAL ADOPTION

Market adoption for emergent Smart Systems solutions is just not there yet. It is hamstringed by both business and technological obstacles which will continue to delay adoption until they are addressed. This unfortunate reality will mean the death of many projects, programs and ventures.

Outside of technological challenges, Smart Systems solution suppliers are plagued with a number of business challenges, true for any next-gen technology provider. The false-start and empty promises from many OEMs and software players left a sour taste in some enterprises’ mouths in regards to the ROI payback from these new connected systems. Many so-called digital initiatives strike out and frequently die in the lab or get stalled in the proof-of-concept jungle – never to see the light of day. Encouraging the active participation from?all stakeholders?of Smart Systems solutions is a must, from the executive who will find the budget to the field-tech using the system, all feedback must be listened to and actively addressed.

Unfortunately, while most businesses are attempting to embrace new technologies and make bold pronouncements about digital maneuvers and strategies, many are not yet embracing new business models of any kind.?Thus, we believe they are in serious danger of moving aggressively to implement—by about 2030—a vintage 2015 strategy.?In so doing, they will destroy value rather than create it.

STEALING THIRD BASE

Mature technologies need to be paired with mature business thinking. But frankly, after hearing “digital maturity”?bandied about for years by people who use it as a substitute for real thinking, we confess to being pretty tired of it.

We’d rather use the less pretentious baseball analogy of “going around the bases.” When an equipment OEM succeeds in “sensing up” its hardware to turbo-charge delivery of services, they’ve reached first base. Once there, they often make more money on services than they did on the initial product sale. Unfortunately, most OEMs get drunk on the big margins at first base and never make it to second.

When a company successfully reaches the “as-a-service” phase of the story, that’s second base. At that stage, the system and service provider has made the successes of first base?easy for users to consume. That’s an important addition to the business model because it means that delivering value to the customer is just as important as delivering it to the provider. But oftentimes, second base is as far as the Smart Systems story goes.

No alt text provided for this image

SHARING RISK

What will it take to really drive hockey stick adoption of new data-driven solutions??Much more than antiquated stage-gated processes. When traditional business practices, company culture and operating models inhibit the required creativity to effectively drive new digital innovation and value creation, or when traditional operating models constrain an organization’s ability to develop digital capabilities, that is when you need to seriously consider throwing out all of the old school rules.

We spend a good deal of our time searching for exceptions to this rule and we think we have found a very compelling example being developed by the Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company (HSB).

This traditional insurance company, founded in 1866, is now in the process of setting the stage to steal third base by addressing new, equipment-as-a-service delivery models . More importantly, they’re innovatively adding “shared risk” to the business model, thus creating even more value for the customer and easing the many obstacles that inhibit adoption of new innovations.

The problem with stealing third base is that our business culture does not democratize the things that make sharing risk easy, which in turn drives more assured outcomes for the customer and users. Typical business thinking remains overly risk averse and not customer-centric. Businesses want to protect IP and do things in secret.

By contrast, HSB offers its partners numerous new possibilities to mitigate risk and ensure new data-driven outcomes can be realized from connected products and systems. These include, among others, warranties on business outcomes. Offering such warranties (for example, on operational efficiency gain, maintenance cost reduction, zero-unplanned downtime, etc.) is a unique approach to minimizing risks for both manufacturers and end customers. HSB not only provides this warranty to its direct partners but also enables the manufacturer to offer it to its customers as well.

When the idea of sharing risk in this way becomes perceived by the business community as valuable enough (or necessary enough) to force the secrecy instinct to give way, data,?ecosystems and collaboration?will be added to business models and lead to a rush to third base and home plate. HSB is making much clearer what the possibilities of advanced technology can be when matched with equally sophisticated business thinking.

Download our Growth Insight “Capturing Value from Growth Opportunities: Equipment as a Service” here.

Kajal Singh

HR Operations | Implementation of HRIS systems & Employee Onboarding | HR Policies | Exit Interviews

8 个月

A must read article. "A prominent characteristic of the past industrial revolutions is the formation of boom-bust cycles. Even though inventions take substantial time to seep into society, the euphoria often leads inventors and investors to believe that their innovations will be quickly and widely adopted. This misconception is further perpetuated by think tanks, strategy companies, and the media, thereby creating hysteria. This hype often leads to an investment-pyramid scheme, thereby resulting in a bust when production exceeds demand enormously. However, these boom-bust cycles can be beneficial to society by providing the capital and workforce needed to build the infrastructure for the widespread adoption of new inventions. For example, the boom-bust cycles related to railroads, telegraph, and broadband communication infrastructures helped human society enormously. This pattern is already occurring in the Fourth Industrial Revolution with Metaverse, Autonomous Vehicles, and Quantum Computing. In fact, the current hype regarding AI may also lead to a partial bust, thereby leading to a third AI winter.

回复
Rafael Garrido

Business Technologist | Business Expansion | Sales Acceleration | Product Strategist | AI Innovation Advocate

1 年

Great article, Glen! As always, you weave front-row observations with compelling storytelling that make Harbor Research publications one of a kind. In my experience, a proper future envisioning phase, followed by rigorous opportunity assessment and selection, are key steps. A minimum viable business approach allows for gradual technological stack development... Easier said than done! As market values shift, companies need to count on partners with a clear vision and the ability to ensure alignment among stakeholders. It is also key that they can connect them with a wider ecosystem and build an enterprise-grade technological stack. In essence, they need partners that can de-risk every step of the way. Thank you so much for sharing!

Gregory Cmar

Founder, CTO at Interval Data Systems

1 年

I would enjoy hearing more about how HBS addresses the data issues. Who does the audit of data sources? Where is it stored? How is access managed? And how do customers make use of the new tools?

Great article and spot on perspective. As I reflect on the technology solutions and projects to which I have been involved, the song “Stuck In The Middle With You” keeps looping in my brain. ??

John Huston

Chief Executive Officer at Division 25 LLC

1 年

You hit the nail on the head, engagement of ALL stakeholders is a must, but that is not the whole story. All stakeholders must be in support of the end goal. The client must have a Champion that leads the effort, gets everyone onboard, and enforces the vision. If you have even one stakeholder that is against the solution, the technologies, the vendors, the additional effort, the process, etc., they can become a very strong negative force. We have seen many integration projects fall short of their intended goals because of the subversive actions of non-believers. You also need service providers that have the expertise to deliver applications, designs and solutions that enable the clients to realize their visions. The key point is "their vision". If a client is happy with their existing sole sourced, proprietary solution, they will not have a vision for the future. A successful project requires upfront due diligence on both sides. Service providers must confirm that potential clients have a clear vision, do not develop it for them or it will most likely fail due to lack of support and understanding. Clients must confirm that potential service providers have the expertise to achieve their vision.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了