Broad Strokes : Why Early-Stage VCs want Startups growing 4x every year

Broad Strokes : Why Early-Stage VCs want Startups growing 4x every year

→ VCs as most people know invest in startups

→ Generate returns by taking exits from their portfolio of companies → at a higher multiple

→ They essentially raise money from LPs (Limited Partners), whom they have to return capital to

To show this in a better fashion :

Fund life / Typical period for which they can hold their investment in any company is ~8-10 years, post the same they need to exit and give returns to the LPs

LPs mostly are :

  1. Financial Institutions (E.g. Pension Funds)
  2. HNIs (High Networth Individuals) or their Family Offices
  3. Fund of Funds (e.g. Sovereign wealth funds etc.)

For anyone to invest in a VC fund is a risky bet, they can alternately invest in other public market assets which can easily give them an IRR (Internal Rate of Return) of ~ 10 - 12%

Lets say a VC raises 100 Mn for 10 years, which means the minimum return should yield for VC to be considered a remunerative asset for LPs becomes :

100 Mn x [ ( 1 + 12% )^10 ] ~ 310 Mn, which is 3.1 times MoIC (Multiple on Invested Capital)

At an IRR of ~ 12%

For such a risky asset, which :

  • nearly 70% of the time fails give such return or
  • only ~30% give favourable returns (as in diagram)

The risk and return need to be adjusted : (rational assumptions)

70% of the time / funds give 1.2x avg. return in 10 years which is ~ 2% IRR

Which means the remaining 30% of the time, money has to work much harder to get atleast to a viable 12% IRR to take the risk for an LP to invest money into the fund.

To get 3.1x return needed : [Calculations based on Probability]

70% of Money has given 1.2x return = 0.84 times of total value of the fund raised ($ 100 Mn)

Now the remaining 30% has to generate = 3.1x - 0.84x = 2.26x of the total value of the fund

Meaning an MoIC / return of (2.26x / 30%) = ~ 7.53x in 10years Which translates to minimum of ~ 23% IRR for risk to be adjusted

How it translates on the Startup side :

→ Assuming on avg. 30 investments from a fund (highly diversified fund)

→ A cap. of 15% investment can be done in a single company (*Return assumptions are very optimistic)

Now to achieve minimum 7.53 MoIC means

1.24 + 0.225X > 7.53

X > 28 ( MoIC on the winners ) Which translates to IRR being greater than ~40% for the winning bets / startups of the fund.

On Avg. ~5 rounds of investments happen in any Unicorn ( proxy for winners - source)

Which means nearly 4-5 rounds before the Fund takes exit (10 years fund-life) on average 2.5 years to raise next rounds (avg. as early-stage round happen quickly and later stage rounds take much more time)

Which means each consecutive round valuation jump on average should be greater than :

(1 + 40% IRR) ^ (2.5 years) = 2.32 times for minimum viable returns

Hence early stage VCs look for winners who are growing at least 3-4 times every year as a winning bet.

Which translates to a minimum of ~ 10-15% growth on a Month on Month basis.


Roshan Gaikwad

Investment Research | Startup Fundraising | Sell-Side Advisory | Venture Capital | Market Research | Strategic Partnerships | Early-Stage Investments | M&A Advisory | Growth Capital | Deal Structuring & Execution |

1 年

Insightful for folks like us who are new to the industry Thank you ??

回复
Abu Zar Talib

EIR @ Entrepreneur First | BITS Pilani

1 年

Insightful Read. A lot of clarity on a seemingly floating number to someone who hasn't attempted this calculation before. Glad I found this through the recent post :D

回复
Ankit Aggarwal

Founder & CEO, Unstop | Where Employers Attract, Assess and Hire 18 Mn+ Gen Zs | BW Disrupt 40under40

1 年

Very nicely explained Saharsh.

Woodley B. Preucil, CFA

Senior Managing Director

1 年

Saharsh Sharma Very insightful. Thank you for sharing.?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Saharsh Sharma的更多文章

  • How to Engineer Disruption ?

    How to Engineer Disruption ?

    Understanding Customer Value Chain Disruption through Decoupling This article explores the concept of decoupling the…

    1 条评论
  • Early-Signs of Product Market Fit (PMF)

    Early-Signs of Product Market Fit (PMF)

    How do VCs see as early signs of Product-Market Fit ? Mostly seen under 3 broad heads : Large & Ripe Market -…

    3 条评论
  • Why Infra startups usually win?

    Why Infra startups usually win?

    "During a Gold Rush, Sell Shovels" applies to situations where there's a surge in a particular activity. Or to put it…

    13 条评论
  • Venture Capital : Patience & Patterns

    Venture Capital : Patience & Patterns

    Paradox of Patience & the art of Pattern Matching in Venture Capital The world of venture capital is a dynamic and…

    2 条评论
  • How to find your MOAT ?

    How to find your MOAT ?

    Moat : How easy / costly (time & capital) is it to replicate the business. Economic moats are generally difficult to…

    2 条评论
  • B2B commerce: past, present & future

    B2B commerce: past, present & future

    India as an economy is booming, diving into the broad segments of B2B commerce that have seen enormous value creation…

    1 条评论
  • Predicting the ONDC narrative

    Predicting the ONDC narrative

    ONDC is the e-commerce equivalent of UPI ? Penetration of online B2B commerce is only 2% in India (2022) Share of…

    4 条评论
  • Broad Strokes: How Public Market Downturns impacts Private Markets (Part 1)

    Broad Strokes: How Public Market Downturns impacts Private Markets (Part 1)

    All views are personal As we see Public Market Downturns, Private market downturn / funding winter isn't a new…

  • Creating Wealth ?

    Creating Wealth ?

    How can “we” in India create wealth (new generations) ? Other than the extremes of being an incredibly successful…

    6 条评论
  • Broad Strokes: Why VCs say “No”?(Real Reasons)

    Broad Strokes: Why VCs say “No”?(Real Reasons)

    A few “NO(s)” don’t mean anything— Some plausible reasons include : He / She has had a bad experience with another…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了