Britain wasn't misled in 1975
Brexiters often claim that in Britain’s first referendum of 1975 voters were only told that the Common Market - now called the European Union - was just ‘free trade’. But that’s not correct. (Article continues after the video.)
It was clear even before we joined the European Economic Community (as it was called then) that it was much more than just a free trading arrangement.
One year before we joined, Prime Minister Edward Heath wrote for the Illustrated London News:
“The community which we are joining is far more than a common market. It is a community in the true sense of that term.
“It is concerned not only with the establishment of free trade, economic and monetary union and other major economic issues, important though these are — but also as the Paris Summit Meeting has demonstrated, with social issues which affect us all — environmental questions, working conditions in industry, consumer protection, aid to development areas and vocational training.”
In 1975, two years after we joined, the new Labour government held a referendum on whether Britain wanted to remain in the European Community – the exact same referendum as we had in 2016.
The government’s pamphlet sent to every UK household for the referendum stated that the first aims of the Common Market were to ‘bring together the peoples of Europe’, to ‘raise living standards’ and ‘to maintain peace’.
The pamphlet made clear that as a member, Britain has a 'say in the future economic and political development of the Common Market.’ If we left the Common Market, 'Britain would no longer have any say'.
It could not have missed anyone’s attention at the time that the European Community was about much more than just free trade.
Even the Eurosceptics of the time claimed that membership of the Common Market went beyond ‘free trade’.
Their ‘NO’ campaign referendum literature, also distributed to every household, warned what they considered were the dangers of membership:
- To end a thousand years of British freedom and independent nationhood is an unheard of constitutional change.
- Do you want us to be a self-governing nation, or to be a province of Europe?
- Do we want self-government as a great independent nation, or do we want to be governed as a province of the EEC by Commissioners and a Council of Ministers, predominantly foreign, in Brussels?
- Do we want to lose the whole of our individual influence as a nation, which is still great, in order to enhance the status of Europe, which would then function largely outside our control?
Although in over 40 years of membership the fears and warnings of the 1975 ‘NO’ campaign have not materialised, their arguments haven’t changed. In fact, the 2016 referendum has simply regurgitated the same old arguments that took place in the first referendum.
There is little difference between the European Economic Community of 1975 and the European Union of today. They share the same foundational principles and aspirations.
Of course, in over 60 years since its foundation, the European Community has grown phenomenally, with more countries wanting to join. But that just demonstrates the success of the EU project.
The Conservative government under David Cameron could have saved a fortune by simply re-printing the 1975 referendum pamphlet and distributing it for the 2016 referendum.
Almost all the points and arguments remain the same. Nothing much has changed. Read the Labour government’s 1975 pamphlet and judge for yourself.
- Follow my journalism page on Facebook: Jon Danzig writes
- Follow my Stop Brexit campaign on Facebook: Reasons2Remain
Commercial Director @The Prime Group
6 年Thanks, i couldn't have put it any better
Using my proven knowledge/expertise in Administration to the advantage of a Great Employer. Unfluencer??
6 年Oh we were so mislead by the political elite over the eu, the benefirts were exaggerated and the costs hidden.? But I do remember the inflation rate at that time was 25% and had only riddent so high after we had joined.? it was supposed to have meant no customs limits for booze and gigs - that never emerged and for most people that would have been the only benefit that mattered in that period. But the people most lied to about the real effect of joining the EU was probably the Irish - as they are now finding out
Scaling Companies | Driving Innovation | Cluster Development | Infrastructure Specialist
6 年Spot on Jon! The only difference between then and now is that as Home Secretary, Theresa May has vilified immigrants to the UK. As a result, xenophobia has become the weapon of choice for Euro-sceptics and their followers. The so called 'hostile environment' she nurtured has created a culture that is harming decent hardworking families where one or more members is from another EU member state. Brexit is an ideology that has found favour with and given cause to racist groups. In short, it has become a complete antithesis to the founding principles of the EU.