Brightpath singled out by Australian expert panel

Brightpath singled out by Australian expert panel

There are not many Edtech start-ups that could hope to be identified as meeting a national need, but that is what has happened for Brightpath

A recent expert panel identified Brightpath as one of the few tools that was:

capable of providing information about the points students have reached in their learning and the growth they have made over time.

The panel stipulated that the development of an on-line assessment resource should not replace assessment resources, such as Brightpath, which are already available to schools. 

No alt text provided for this image

Background to the panel’s recommendation

In March 2018, the Commonwealth government published the Through Growth to Achievement: Report of the Review to Achieve Educational Excellence in Australian Schools report which recommended ways that Australia could improve student outcomes. The review recommended that:

1.      Schools measure student growth, not student achievement.

2.      Teachers be given practical support by creating an online, formative assessment tool to help diagnose a student's current level of knowledge, skill and understanding, to identify the next steps in learning to achieve the next stage in growth, and to track student progress over time against a typical development trajectory.

Following the publication of the Gonski report, the Commonwealth Minister for Education and Training established an expert reference panel to reflect on the Gonski recommendations and to assist in developing a shared vision for implementing these recommendations.

Hattie, Masters and Cawsey appointed to the panel

Professor John Hattie, Professor Geoff Masters and Christine Cawsey, were appointed to the panel.

Consistent with the recommendations made in the Gonski review, Hattie, Masters and Cawsey, identified that work needed to be undertaken to develop:

1.      Learning progressions that describe developmental pathways along which students typically progress in their learning over time,

2.      Assessment Resources that are provided on-demand and which provide teachers with additional information about the points students have achieved in their learning, and learning growth over time. The panel recommended that these resources needed to provide teachers with formative and summative interpretations about student progress and should provide teachers with information about the next steps in learning.

3.      High quality professional learning that focussed on the use of the assessment resources to plan better teaching and learning.

The expert panel identified Brightpath as one of the few tools ‘aligned with well-constructed learning progressions and capable of providing information about the points students have reached in their learning and the growth they have made over time.’ The panel stipulated that the development of an on-line assessment resource should not replace assessment resources, such as Brightpath, which are already available to schools. 

Andrea Hillbrick

Educational Consultant: Learning Essentials with Andrea Hillbrick

5 年

Congratulations Sandy!

Well-deserved. Congratulations, Sandy.

Gillian Dale-Jones

Portfolio of casual roles after 40 years in the world of Finance and teaching

5 年

Well deserved recognition

Tim Praill

Experienced C-Suite Executive and Non Exec Director. Ex BCG and LBS MBA

5 年

Great work Sandy!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sandra Heldsinger的更多文章

  • Speaking up

    Speaking up

    Should I, or shouldn’t I? Should I, or shouldn’t I? I have procrastinated for a while whether or not to discuss the The…

    13 条评论
  • Just how good are the Australians?

    Just how good are the Australians?

    I never thought I’d be using an article about the Ashes to explain how the Brightpath mathematics assessments help…

    2 条评论
  • School goals: insights from business

    School goals: insights from business

    I have just listened to a great HBR Ideacast with Roger Martin about how a business’s drive for efficiency can…

    1 条评论
  • Replacing NAPLAN

    Replacing NAPLAN

    ‘Cutting-edge’: the project that could replace NAPLAN. So read the head line to a recent Sydney Morning Herald article.

    13 条评论
  • Will technology provide a breakthrough in educational assessment?

    Will technology provide a breakthrough in educational assessment?

    Standardised testing programs seem to have been around forever. Debate about these programs hasn’t abated.

    2 条评论
  • $309.6 billion set aside for Australian schools

    $309.6 billion set aside for Australian schools

    Plus ?a change, plus c'est la même chose? Our newly appointed Education Minister, Dan Tehan has set out his mission for…

    3 条评论
  • Did you know?

    Did you know?

    National Curriculum levels in England were reported to have had a profoundly negative impact on teaching and learning…

    5 条评论
  • Gonski 2.0: Australia's going back to learning progressions

    Gonski 2.0: Australia's going back to learning progressions

    We have a long, international, and costly history of curriculum change. New curricula are pursued with great gusto…

  • Meeting the Gonski recommendations

    Meeting the Gonski recommendations

    As many of my Australian colleagues will be aware, the Australian Government recently established the Review to Achieve…

  • What is NAPLAN costing us?

    What is NAPLAN costing us?

    In April 2015, Justin Coulson vented his frustration about NAPLAN in the Daily Telegraph, with the headline, ‘Just…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了