Brexit must be 'Subject to Contract'?

Brexit must be 'Subject to Contract'

Nobody offers to buy or sell a house unless it’s ‘Subject to Contract’. Nobody negotiates to buy or sell a business unless it’s ‘Subject to Contract’.

The legal definition of ‘Subject to Contract’ is:

‘The parties are not legally bound until the contract is executed’.

In any deal, if you don’t like the contract, you can walk away. Agreeing to a contract before you’ve seen the contract is nuts.

? In the 2016 referendum, nobody had any details of the Brexit contract.

That's because there was no contract. There was no agreement.

No plan, no manifesto, no blueprint for Brexit.

On the contrary, the country was given a load of promises about Brexit – typical salesman spiel – that have turned out to be false, exaggerated and, frankly, baloney.

Last year former Prime Minister, Theresa May, negotiated a 585-page contract with the EU that was not available to anyone during the referendum.

None of the details in this draft contract bore any resemblance to the promises and claims made by Brexiters during the referendum, who it seems were prepared to say anything to clinch the vote for Leave.

Parliament gave this contract a resounding and overwhelming thumbs down, making history as the biggest ever government defeat on the floor of the House of Commons.

The government then asked Parliament to change its mind (something we – the people – apparently are not allowed to do).

And then on two more occasions, Parliament again rejected her deal.

Throughout the process, Mrs May said that:

"Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed."

Now, the new Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, has negotiated a new(ish) exit deal of 534 pages long.

It involves an arrangement that he previously said that no British Prime Minster would ever accept: a customs border down the Irish Sea.

Parliament voted to delay considering Johnson’s deal until it is subject to further Parliamentary scrutiny – which in more normal times would be, well, normal.

It means that over three years after the referendum, and just 11 days before we are scheduled to leave the EU, nothing is agreed.

? Nothing is agreed. Brexit is not agreed. There is still no plan for Brexit.

So, now what? I will tell you what.

? We, the people, need to have our say.

It’s our country. It’s our future. The consequences of Brexit will affect us, our children, our children’s children and generations far into the future.

Nobody gave informed consent for Brexit on 23 June 2016. The country was not at all informed about what Brexit meant, or what kind of Brexit we might get.

On the contrary, we were entirely misinformed about Brexit.

That's why we now need a new vote, for the very first time, on whatever Brexit it is that we're going to be offered.

If we don’t have an opportunity to agree or not agree on what happens next, it means that the Brexit deal - or no deal - will be imposed on us without our permission.

And that will mean that Brexit happens without the clear ‘will of the people’.

It’s now essential that we have a new vote on Brexit. Only those who are against democracy, and the democratic process, disagree.

  • If Britain then votes to accept the Brexit deal, then so be it.
  • Or if Britain then votes to reject the Brexit contract and to keep the status quo – our full membership of the EU – then so be it.

With Parliament at loggerheads every day over Brexit, this is now the only way to settle the matter. Democratically. By order of ‘the people’.


  • Commentary and graphic by Jon Danzig
  • Please re-Tweet, and follow Reasons2Remain on Twitter.
  • Reasons2Remain is a campaign for a democratic reversal of #Brexit. We believe that Brexit will do great harm to Britain, and that we didn’t have the full facts in 2016.
R Anthony Davis

Investor, entrepreneur, global banking and finance SVP and high tech sector Managing Director.

5 年

Leave means leave, contract, deal or no contract or no deal:?https://leavemeansleave.eu/

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jon Danzig的更多文章

  • Fixing broken Britain starts with changing a broken lightbulb

    Fixing broken Britain starts with changing a broken lightbulb

    UK democracy needs radical reform, but there’s little evidence our leaders are ready to take up the challenge, writes…

    2 条评论
  • It was never just about trade

    It was never just about trade

    Eurosceptics often claim that they love Europe but hate the European Union. They assert that Britain can still be part…

    5 条评论
  • My extremely bizarre overnight sleep test

    My extremely bizarre overnight sleep test

    Today is World Sleep Day. Their message this year is to promote that sleep is essential for health.

    1 条评论
  • A vote for Brexit was a vote for Putin

    A vote for Brexit was a vote for Putin

    After the EU referendum, suspicions grew about the role of Russia in clinching the narrow ‘win’ for Brexit. Evidence…

    11 条评论
  • The value of being citizens of Europe

    The value of being citizens of Europe

    Back in 2013 I wrote an article called, THE VALUE OF BEING CITIZENS OF EUROPE. We didn’t know then that within three…

    5 条评论
  • Never again? It's happening again.

    Never again? It's happening again.

    After the Second World War, during which many millions were systematically, industrially, gruesomely murdered in the…

    4 条评论
  • How did we get stuck with Brexit?

    How did we get stuck with Brexit?

    All the Tory candidates to be our next Prime Minister just accept Brexit as a fact of life, without question, even…

    5 条评论
  • How do we get out of this mess?

    How do we get out of this mess?

    In my life, I have never known a worse time either for my country or the world at large. I started to campaign against…

    2 条评论
  • Brexit laid bare

    Brexit laid bare

    Brexit is based on blatant mistruths and lies. Every reason given to leave was a stinking falsification.

    1 条评论
  • In Britain, general elections are how 'the people' decide

    In Britain, general elections are how 'the people' decide

    Some people say it was undemocratic for Britain to join the European Community in 1973 because ‘the people’ weren’t…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了