Breaking Through the Middle Office Quagmire: Cracking the CPQ Code

Breaking Through the Middle Office Quagmire: Cracking the CPQ Code

CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) functionality is often referred to as the "middle office," sitting strategically between the CRM system (front office) and ERP system (back office). It serves as the heartbeat of many organizations, playing a crucial role in ensuring smooth business operations. However, challenges in this area can lead to significant frustration for CXOs, creating both operational headaches and business disruption.

Several robust CPQ platforms are available, each excelling in its own way. However, when faced with issues, many leaders default to evaluating alternative platforms. While switching platforms may sometimes be justified, in many cases, allowing the internal team time and budget to address the problem may be a more effective solution. Switching platforms can be costly, time-consuming, and disruptive to the business, often hindering progress rather than facilitating it.

Enterprise projects require careful planning, often taking as much time as the execution phase itself. Rushing to show quick results can lead to suboptimal outcomes and challenges post-implementation. In my experience, success often lies in thorough introspection before jumping to platform evaluations.

These insights are drawn from the challenges and successes we've faced over the years in navigating the complexities of CPQ systems.

?

1.? Solving for 99+% of Revenue: Why the 80-20 Rule Fails in CPQ

If you're only addressing 90+% of quoting use cases, you'd better have a rock-solid plan for the remaining Because when a sales leader is battling quarter-end pressure, they don’t care about project success criteria or what percentage you planned to cover. Even the leader who originally signed off on solving for just 90+% won't want to hear about it when deals are on the line. In CPQ, every exception matters. The final x% of edge cases often represents critical revenue moments, and when that causes delays or friction, it can derail momentum at the worst possible time. So,—solve for the entire pipeline with systems and easy-to-follow workarounds. Anything less, and you're inviting frustration, firefighting, and lost opportunities.

2.??The Complexity of Configurations: Choosing the Right CPQ Platform

You’ve likely heard the advice: "If you have complex configurations, go with product X." But what does "complex" really mean? For some, it could mean building a ship or managing engineered-to-order products; for others, it might simply involve selecting items with exclusivity rules. The real question is: Will I need to hard-code my rules due to complex, multi-product dependencies, making it impossible to manage with simple SKU-based business rules?

If yes, you need a platform that offers scripting flexibility to handle intricate scenarios. However, if your complexity is more about defining business rules and less about coding, choose a solution that allows maximum flexibility without requiring complex scripts.

The goal is to ensure the platform matches your configuration needs without overcomplicating your processes or underpowering your setup. Have a clear definition of complexity and where your product lies on the complexity spectrum.

?3. Quote Size & Performance: Plan for the Extremes

Most CPQ tools perform well for average quotes, but the real test is how they handle your largest deals. You'll face slow quarter ends if even 5-10% of your quotes push the limits. Can your tool manage the biggest deal you encounter, even if it happens once a quarter or year? It would be best if you had a solid plan to handle those exceptions, or they’ll come back to haunt you when timing matters most.

4.? Pricing: Anticipating Flexibility for Market Needs

CPQ pricing handles standard use cases well, but challenges arise when marketing teams push for creative strategies. Often, pricing capabilities become a roadblock to quick market experimentation. It’s crucial to anticipate not just current needs but also future marketing and business plans for the next 6-8 quarters. Do you require advanced promotion features or complex pricing models? If your organization sells subscriptions, can the tool quickly support offers like "50% off for the first three months"? Ensure your CPQ can handle these scenarios without becoming a bottleneck.

5.? Price Sharing: Seamless Integration is Key

Back-office order management and self-service sites often require pricing visibility. Can your CPQ platform expose pricing rules through APIs so these systems can access them seamlessly? Can it integrate with an external pricing engine without performance lag if not? Ensuring smooth, real-time price sharing across platforms is essential for operational efficiency and customer experience.

6.?Go Headless or Go Home:?Headless CPQ: Flexibility Across Channels

If your organization needs to deliver quoting across multiple channels with a unique user experience, a headless CPQ is key. Can the platform function as a plug-and-play engine, allowing you to integrate its core features anywhere while maintaining full control over the UX? This ensures you can customize the front-end experience without worrying about the backend complexities.

?7.?Multi-Location Quoting: Scaling for Complexity

Imagine selling to a retailer with hundreds of storefronts, each requiring different configurations. Your CPQ system might breeze through quoting for 10 or 15 locations, but what happens when dealing with 200 or even 500 locations? This is where the platform’s ability to handle complexity and scale becomes crucial.

We once faced a similar challenge. Everything worked fine for smaller clients, but the moment a large retailer with hundreds of stores came into the picture, the system started to lag. We quickly realized that multi-location quoting wasn’t just about handling a few locations—it’s about ensuring the system can scale without performance issues, no matter how large the customer base gets.

Before choosing a platform, ensure it’s built to handle the demands of your largest customers. Test its limits. Verify its design patterns for large-scale quoting scenarios. The last thing you want is to find out, mid-quote, that your system can’t keep up with your growth.

8.?Integration: The Heart of the Middle Office

Seamless integration with back-office and front-office systems is vital for practical CPQ functionality. If your platform offers prebuilt, configurable native integrations, that’s a win. But if not, the speed and ease of integration with standard middleware become critical.

Ask yourself: Can you add additional integrations through simple configuration and visually orchestrate the workflow? Ensuring your CPQ system can adapt and connect effortlessly with other applications is essential for streamlined operations and overall business agility.

9. Reporting: Ensuring Accessibility and Efficiency

Executive reporting during month-end and quarter-end periods often demands multiple updates daily. Your data warehouse and operations teams need to effortlessly pull data from the CPQ platform.

Consider how critical it is to report on quotes and their status: Are prebuilt integrations available, or can custom solutions be developed quickly? The ability to extract data multiple times daily is a crucial factor to evaluate when choosing a CPQ system. Efficient reporting capabilities can make all the difference in maintaining operational effectiveness and executive insight.

10. AI Readiness: Preparing for the Future of Quoting

In today’s landscape, AI readiness is crucial for predictive analytics, quoting assistance, and future agent capabilities. Many CPQ tools offer discount and deal winnability indicators, but it is vital to assess their setup process and overall value.

Do you know if these features are easy to configure, and do they align with your specific business needs? Understanding the practicality and effectiveness of AI tools will be essential to leveraging technology for more intelligent decision-making and enhanced sales outcomes.

11.?Transparency: Monitoring Performance During Peak Seasons

Last but not least, effective administration and performance monitoring of your CPQ tool during peak seasonal periods is crucial. Ensure you can easily track application performance from the admin dashboard without contacting customer support.

While this may seem like a minor usability feature, real-time visibility empowers admins to manage operations smoothly during busy times, benefiting the entire business.

Kevin Wynn

Revenue Lifecycle Management Expert

1 个月

Excellent article Srinivasan Muralidharan. I can't emphasize how much of an issue your second point is for so many implementations. Too many vendor selections are based on tech stack or industry - CPQ requires user story detail in order to understand the correct platform, and choosing the wrong platform will increase administration and implementation costs and timelines by multiples.

回复
Tim Beck

CEO @ SAASTEPS | Seven Siloed Revenue Systems Turned Into One | Taking Unstructured Data, Making it Structured | Delivering Predictable Repeatable Revenue Outcomes

1 个月

Srinivasan Muralidharan I live in Broomfield let’s grab lunch next week.

回复
Tim Beck

CEO @ SAASTEPS | Seven Siloed Revenue Systems Turned Into One | Taking Unstructured Data, Making it Structured | Delivering Predictable Repeatable Revenue Outcomes

1 个月

Srinivasan Muralidharan we should talk. While CPQ is important it really only helps your close your first contract or order online. What connects the middle office to the ERP is automating the rest of the revenue lifecycle. SAASTEPS has been developing on the salesforce platform for close to 13 years. We have taken seven siloed solutions (CPQ being one of the siloed systems) and we have seamlessly integrated all of them. Most people push/integrate revenue data and send it to back office ERP to manage billing, invoiceing, assets, renewals, revenue recognition. At SAASTEPS our single managed package does all of this and automates everything. We send the finalized data back to the ERP for tracking and GL. We feel it is better to empower the entire revenue teams and bring them into a single-data model. The best part customers do not need to leave Salesforce as all your data stays in one place and you don’t need data cloud. We already mapped out all revenue workflow processes. More importantly we can turn on 100% automation and no human or AI is needed.

Russ Halvorson

Global Head of Sales Engineering

1 个月

I’m not sure I agree on first bullet as written. There is no solution in market that handles 99% of enterprise company revenue out of box, with UX, scale, and performance. The probability of a project being successful falls drastically in the pursuit of perfection. The 80/20 rule for CPQ is more about maximizing customer time to value by focusing on low hanging fruit and quick wins. I’ve seen customers spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to make market leading tools do everything in the kitchen sink - focusing on if they could, rather than if they should — and it usually results in a very expensive compliance tool that everyone hates. Before looking at a technology to solve everything, I think you need to start with company strategy, goals, process — this defines success in a much more manageable way than solving for 99% of today.

Luis “Alex” Delgado

???? Salesforce Veteran | CEO & Principal Consultant at Design First LLC | Knowledge Sharer

1 个月

Fantastic article Srinivasan Muralidharan! You hit the nail on the head with all of your points but #1 really resonates. I’ve worked with countless organizations where taking the 80-20 rule is mandated but is usually at the expense of entire sets of deals or accounts. If you can cover all uses cases, you essentially build a sustainable and flexible CPQ that users will trust. Thanks for sharing!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了