Breaking Language Barriers in Philanthropy: How AI Can Help Bridge the Gap Between Funders and Communities

In an era where philanthropic foundations increasingly aim for systemic change and equitable partnerships, language barriers remain a significant obstacle to inclusive grantmaking. Drawing from personal experience and emerging technological solutions, this article explores how AI-powered translation tools can help bridge this gap while maintaining the human connection essential to effective philanthropy.

The Power of Speaking Partner Languages

I speak and understand 5 languages, and in my previous role as a foundation staff member, these language skills proved invaluable in both partnership scoping discussions and active grantee engagements. I've seen firsthand how speaking a partner's language, even imperfectly, transforms relationships. It builds trust, encourages fuller participation from those less comfortable with English, and provides funders with deeper insights into systemic challenges, particularly during informal conversations.

This linguistic versatility stems from growing up in Switzerland's multilingual education system, where learning multiple languages is mandatory. While not everyone shares this advantage, my experience shows that each additional language learned makes acquiring others easier, especially when immersed in local communities.

The Language Divide in Global Philanthropy

In low-resource contexts where many philanthropic foundations work and partner with NGOs, governments, or researchers, there's often a stark disconnect between official and locally spoken languages - a lasting colonial legacy. Take Africa as an example: while the continent has an estimated 2,000 living languages, only a handful of colonial languages serve as official languages in most countries. In Nigeria alone, over 500 languages are spoken, yet English remains the official language. Similarly, while French serves as the official language in 21 African countries, it's estimated that only 35% of the population in these nations actually speaks French fluently. This linguistic diversity presents both richness and challenges - in Ethiopia, for instance, despite having over 80 ethnic groups and languages, most international development work is conducted in English or Amharic, potentially excluding significant portions of local communities.

This language barrier manifests most visibly when working with government partners, local NGOs, and researchers, particularly in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa. I've witnessed countless instances where capable partners hesitate to engage fully due to discomfort with their English proficiency. The challenge becomes even more pronounced in rural, marginalized communities, where local languages predominate.

Current Approaches and Their Limitations

As philanthropic foundations increasingly embrace systems change and participatory, trust-based partnerships with organizations close to marginalized communities, the ability to engage in meaningful dialogue becomes paramount. Traditional approaches to bridging this linguistic and cultural divide have typically relied on two strategies: engaging intermediary organizations and issuing open calls for proposals. While these approaches move in the right direction, they often fall short of truly solving the language barrier.

Intermediary organizations, while valuable partners, frequently also exhibit a certain bias. These organizations typically excel in donor languages but may lack deep connections with certain sub-sets of local partners – either due to language barriers themselves (consider Nigeria's 60+ local languages) or because of socioeconomic and cultural distances that can create unconscious biases.

The open call for proposals approach, while seemingly more inclusive, often inadvertently disadvantages high-quality community organizations. Limited donor language proficiency can overshadow an organization's actual capabilities and impact potential. This creates an unintended advantage for organizations wealthy enough to afford international staff or professional proposal writers – perpetuating the very inequities foundations seek to address.

AI Translation: A New Tool for Inclusive Grantmaking

Recent advances in generative AI and translation tools are beginning to reshape this landscape, particularly in low-resource contexts. Organizations like Vambo AI, for instance, are revolutionizing local language AI capabilities in Sub-Saharan Africa, offering high-quality translations in major regional languages. This technological progress opens new possibilities for more equitable funding approaches.

However, implementing AI translation in grantmaking requires careful consideration. Through my work with various partners, I've learned that trust depends not just on language but on respect for privacy and autonomy. We must be transparent about AI tool usage, secure explicit partner consent, and ensure data security. AI translation should serve as a bridge-building tool that enhances, rather than replaces, human connection and understanding.

Key Areas Where Language Barriers Impact Grantmaking

The language challenge affects multiple aspects of the grantmaking process:

• Partner Scoping: Language barriers can prevent funders from identifying the most effective local partners, particularly those deeply embedded in target communities.
• Proposal Development and Strategy Understanding: Many marginalized organizations struggle to grasp funders' strategic priorities when these are only available in donor languages, limiting their ability to submit competitive proposals in the donor's language. Even if they understand them well, they might not showcase their pitch convincing enough due to language barriers.
• Proposal Review and Reporting: Language proficiency often unfairly influences proposal evaluation, while reporting requirements in non-native languages can burden partner organizations and mask important nuances of their work.
• Impact Measurement and Learning: Standardized KPIs and data collection tools, when translated from donor languages, may miss crucial cultural context. Meanwhile, valuable insights from local language social media and community feedback often go uncaptured, even though they could show major political or mindset shifts.
• Peer-learning among Grantees: Increasingly, philanthropic foundations aim for more than just financial capital, and offer peer-learning opportunities for their grantees. Language barriers can hamper significantly such noble intentions.

Practical Solutions and Tools

Recent innovations offer promising solutions to these challenges. According to a recent Digital Caribou analysis of inclusive grantmaking practices driven by AI, funders can now enable proposal submissions in any relevant language, using AI tools to translate both proposals and strategic guidance documents. This democratizes access to funding opportunities while maintaining efficiency.

For proposal review, AI can help reduce unconscious bias by analyzing anonymized submissions while accounting for different cultural expression styles. My foundation experience has shown how writing style can unduly influence assessments – AI tools, properly implemented, can help level this playing field.

Virtual peer learning has become more accessible through simple but effective solutions like automated caption translation that Zoom offers. For impact measurement, innovative tools like Fortell are showing promise – their AI-powered avatars have successfully gathered beneficiary feedback in local languages, even in remote areas of South Sudan. While the concept might seem unconventional, early research indicates strong community acceptance of these tools.

Balancing Technology with Human Connection

These tools and approaches, while powerful, aren't perfect. Quality control remains essential, particularly in ensuring AI systems don't perpetuate existing biases. Ongoing investment in comprehensive, current local language datasets is crucial, as highlighted in recent Stanford Social Innovation Review article on AI equity in development contexts.

We must also guard against creating new forms of exclusion. While AI can break down language barriers, we need flexible approaches that work for partners with limited technical infrastructure or internet access. This might mean using AI translation for initial communications while maintaining human translators for crucial discussions, or ensuring offline alternatives remain available.

Success in implementing these AI-enabled changes requires thoughtful attention to the human element that makes grantmaking effective. This means regular quality assessments, clear error-handling protocols, and always giving partners choice in how they communicate. Our goal isn't to technologize grantmaking but to make it more inclusive and equitable while honoring partner dignity and agency.

What experiences have you had using local languages in partnership engagement? What translation approaches have you found effective in transforming grantee-funder relationships?

I produce this blogpost series in collaboration with EDUCATE Ventures Research .

We support philanthropic foundations developing an AI mindset to accelerate impact.

Get in touch for our customized foundation support on AI diagnostic, AI strategy development, AI literacy staff & Trustee training, AI pilot & implementation support!

#ai4philanthropy #aiforgood #philanthropy