Breaking the Drama Cycle in Cybersecurity: Moving Beyond Blame and Shame
Jane Frankland
Cybersecurity Influencer | Advisor | Author | Speaker | LinkedIn Top Voice | Award-Winning Security Leader | Awards Judge | UN Women UK Delegate to the UN CSW | Recognised by Wiki & UNESCO
Drama.
It's something we often associate with TV shows and movies, but it has a sneaky way of infiltrating even the most professional environments, including cybersecurity. With recent events like the CrowdStrike IT outage causing global disruption and significant financial losses, and the controversial Palo Alto Networks-sponsored event at Black Hat USA, where models were presented as mannequins adorned in evening wear with lampshades obscuring their faces, it's evident that the cybersecurity field is not immune to drama.
But why does this happen? And more importantly, how can we move beyond the blame and shame that often accompany these dramatic episodes?
Why Drama is Detrimental
Drama in cybersecurity often creates a cycle reminiscent of the Drama Triangle, conceived by psychiatrist Stephen Karpman, where individuals assume the roles of Victim, Persecutor, and Rescuer, perpetuating conflict rather than fostering collaborative solutions.
When individuals adopt the Victim role, they often feel powerless and may resist taking accountability for their actions, which can lead to a culture of blame and inaction.
Conversely, those in the Persecutor role tend to cast judgment on others, creating an environment filled with hostility and fear, while Rescuers/ Heroes, though seemingly supportive, may undermine others' agency by stepping in too often.
Individuals caught in the Drama Triangle often oscillate between the roles of Victim, Persecutor, and Rescuer/Hero, leading to a cycle of unproductive interactions.
For instance, a person may initially position themselves as the Victim, feeling overwhelmed by challenges, but then switch to the Persecutor role when they blame others for their situation. This shifting creates a chaotic environment that hinders accountability and collaboration, perpetuating a cycle of dysfunction instead of fostering constructive dialogue and resolutions.
In cybersecurity, where collaboration and shared responsibility are crucial, the Drama Triangle stifles innovation and unity. This toxic dynamic creates barriers to effective communication, leading to misunderstandings and resentment among team members.
Be Wary of Rescuers and Heroes
In the aftermath of a dramatic event, there's often a desire to find someone to blame and someone to save the day and alleviate anger. This leads to the emergence of Rescuers and Heroes in cyber - individuals who try to come in and "fix" things, whether they're truly capable or not.
As leaders, it's essential for us to be aware of this phenomenon and avoid falling into the trap of relying on these rescuers and "heroes." Instead, we must acknowledge their limitations, and encourage open dialogue, empowerinig our teams to take ownership of their mistakes and work collaboratively towards finding solutions.
Considering Blame and Shame
As humans, it's inevitable that we’ll screw up at points in our career, but by focusing solely on assigning blame and shaming we stifle growth and learning.
As leaders in cyber we must lead by example, and move away from this unhelpful approach.?This requires us to put processes in place that minimise failures, and ensure that we’re building cultures that empower people to say,
“I screwed up, how can I and others around me learn from this, and make things right?”?
We must foster environments where mistakes are seen as opportunities for improvement and learning, encouraging open dialogue and empowerment. We must build workplace cultures that are safe and empowering, and will support and challenge in equal doses.
The Just Culture is a good place to start to understand the principles of safety and empowerment, and how they can apply to us in cybersecurity.
Just Culture
According to David Marx, a leading expert on safety culture, “A just culture is one in which an organisation’s values are operationalised to support people who engage in adaptive behaviour making choices that are both judicious and accountable.”
领英推荐
In other words, it's about creating a culture where employees feel comfortable admitting mistakes and taking ownership of them, without fear of punishment or retribution. This empowers them to learn from their errors and make necessary changes to prevent future occurrences.
Our Role as Leaders
As leaders, we play a crucial role in establishing a "just culture" within our organisations. To do so, we must communicate and model the values of accountability, transparency, and learning from mistakes. We must create environments of psychological safety, where employees feel comfortable speaking up and sharing their thoughts and concerns without fear of judgement or negative consequences.
Additionally, we must foster diversity of thought within teams so they can contribute to a more inclusive and just culture, as different perspectives help identify potential issues or areas for improvement that may have been overlooked by a homogenous group.
Make a Change
Both the recent failures at CrowdStrike and Black Hat USA serve as wake-up calls for us as cybersecurity leaders and a community to reassess our approach to not only handling mistakes and failures but judging them too.
Instead of dwelling on blame and shame, we must focus on creating a "just culture" that promotes learning, growth, and inclusivity.
By adopting these principles and values, we can build more cyber resilient and secure organisations for the future. If we don’t, then we won’t get the high performance from our cyber teams, the reporting on potential cyberattacks from our greatest cyber shield - our employees - and risks will increase.?
To End
Drama and blame in cybersecurity are not just unproductive; they are harmful. They create an environment where people are afraid to take risks, admit mistakes, and learn from them. By shifting our focus from blame and shame to a "just culture," we can foster environments where innovation and collaboration thrive.
It's time to break the cycle. Let's create cultures that empower our teams, value diversity of thought, and prioritise learning and growth. In doing so, we will not only enhance our cybersecurity efforts but also build stronger, more resilient organisations.
Let's make this change together.
For a deeper understanding of how you can implement these principles in your organisation, consider reaching out to experts or joining forums where these topics are discussed. Your first step could be as simple as starting a conversation with your team about the importance of moving beyond blame and shame in cybersecurity.
To learn more about how to implement a culture that's safe and empowers, read Just Culture, Balancing Safety and Accountability.
To learn more about women in cybersecurity and why a failure to attract and retain women is causing us to be less safe, read IN Security, and join the movement.
Now I want to hear from you...
Tell me about a time when you've seen the Drama Triangle or blame and shame dynamics play out in your organisation.
How did it impact the team and their ability to work together? What steps could have been taken to shift towards a "just culture"?
Share your thoughts and experiences in the comment box. Let's be the change we want to see and continue the conversation so we can work towards building stronger, more resilient teams and organisations in cybersecurity.
About Jane Frankland
Jane Frankland is an award-winning cybersecurity leader, author, and women’s change agent. Her authority is referenced by Wiki, LinkedIn (Top Voice), Thinkers360, and UNESCO. She built her own global penetration testing firm in the late 90s, has worked as a Managing Director at Accenture, and contributed to numerous industry initiatives, including CREST, Cyber Essentials, and Women4Cyber. Through her IN Security Movement, 419 women have received scholarships, a value of almost USD $1,000,000. She regularly shares her thought leadership and leader-developer skills with forward-thinking companies and governments, and has been featured in the Sunday Times, The Financial Times, The Guardian, Forbes and the BBC. To find out more, visit https://jane-frankland.com
IBM Distinguished Architect - Security Architect - Office of the CISO at IBM (CISSP CEng)
3 个月This is a super insightful post. And its important as sooo much of effective cyber ops depends on this sort of stuff. Like many cyber professionals (or IT professionals full stop) I have been through counselling sessions to help manage stress so this is not the first time I have come across the drama triangle. I have certainly seen this dynamic play out in teams throughout IT, but more especially in cyber it tends to become toxic. Esp if management are not conscious of it and how their behaviors and preferences can aggravate it. I have explored using something called 'Clean Language' as a way of communicating often uncomfortable messages in a non confrontational way. It takes into account the different perspectives and frames of ref of groups of people in a particular interaction. I have found this beneficial in my cyber ops teams as well as on an interpersonal level in my day to day work. (Its particularly effective when you are 'the only woman in the room' and need to assert yourself in a way that does not alienate or leave you open to irrelevant criticisms) This is the reference book I started with: From Contempt to Curiosity: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Contempt-Curiosity-Conditions-Collaborate-Modelling/dp/0957486618
Crime Prevention | Stakeholder Engagement | Human Centred Design | Safer Cities | Digital Transformation | Ethics
3 个月Victim, Persecutor, Hero dynamics can be toxic to team culture. Encouraging ownership, fostering psychological safety, and embracing diverse perspectives is the way forward in building stronger, more innovative security teams.
Mindset & Emotional Resilience Coach | Award-winning Transformation Leader | Cybersecurity Speaker | TEDx Speaker | Best-selling Author | CA (SA)
3 个月Very insightful and thought-provoking read Jane Frankland … I love your take on this! I often talk about a toxic trio in the workplace - bully, victim and culture - a bully cannot be a bully without a victim to bully and an organisational culture that allows the bullying to take place in the first place. It’s so important to create psychological safety, especially when it comes to creating a cyber-conscious culture where we rely on people to speak up! Thank you for writing this article ????
Founder & CEO @ Hacker in Heels ? Award-Winning Advocate for Women in Cybersecurity ? Certified Cybersecurity Career Coach ? vCISO for Women Entrepreneurs ? Military Spouse ?????
3 个月This is why my post on the matter focused on collective solutioning over rehashing and blaming. I wanted a dialogue on ideas for future prevention, but many people still got stuck on doubling down on the "wrongness" of the situation or debating the degree of harm. I'm honestly tired of talking about the bad and would rather work on ideas that ensure the future we want to see. I know I am in a privileged position to express such a desire and I don't expect everyone to move at the same pace, but at some point it becomes our own individual decision as to whether or not we're going to keep suffering. Looking forward to reading the book suggestion (Just Culture, I've obviously already read yours!)
? Ik zorg dat je niet harder werkt, maar wel slimmer met Microsoft 365 oplossingen.
3 个月Good article! Think the culture is really important.