Breaking the Binary: How Contemporary Art is Redefining Gender Roles

In this issue of Hey, Art Lover!, we’re diving deep into the evolving landscape of gender roles as seen through the eyes of some of contemporary art’s most groundbreaking voices. From Elizabeth Bergeland’s tender reimagining of masculinity, to Catherine Opie’s provocative portraits that challenge societal norms, to the broader discussion of how gender fluidity is reshaping art as we know it.

SUBSCRIBE

Elizabeth Bergeland: Flipping the Script on Masculinity

Elizabeth Bergeland describes herself as an “incessant melancholy type,” which feels spot-on for an artist whose work digs deep into the grit of masculinity and emerges with paintings so tender, they might make you rethink everything you thought you knew about your high school gym coach. You know the type—red-faced, whistle-blowing, a master at pushing boys into boxes labeled "tough" or "soft." But Elizabeth? She’s prying those boxes wide open, and the results are truly beautiful.

Instead of giving us the same old female figures languishing under the male gaze, she’s doing the opposite—turning the whole thing upside down. It didn’t start as some grand statement. Elizabeth was simply tired of seeing the female form plastered across every gallery wall. A fair critique, given that centuries of art history have been dedicated to variations of the same nude pose. Then something hit her—hard. Watching her young son already begin to act out the script society had written for him—“Boys don’t cry,” “Be tough,” etc.—it was all there, served up like an unappetizing platter of stereotypes, probably with a football and a steak.

This personal realization sparked a shift in Elizabeth’s work. She began thinking not just about how boys grow into men, but how men, from childhood, are groomed to be emotionally stoic, constantly trapped under the weight of a specific kind of masculinity. Her paintings of men are subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) invitations to reconsider what it actually means to "be a man." Her subjects don’t hide behind gritted teeth or muscle-bound poses. They exist as they are—vulnerable, open, and emotionally exposed in ways that seem almost revolutionary.

Elizabeth’s work is filtered through the female gaze, but that’s less about making a feminist statement and more about reintroducing men to the world as whole human beings. Her brushstrokes ask questions most of us would rather not touch: Why does masculinity come with so much pressure? And who, exactly, is setting these impossible standards? In her paintings, you won’t find the usual tropes—no stoicism mistaken for strength, no bravado masking insecurity. What you will find is an unflinching look at men. It’s a perspective we’re not used to seeing, and it’s that discomfort—the space between what we’ve been conditioned to expect and what we’re actually presented with—that gives her work its power.

What makes her approach even more compelling is that she doesn’t hand us easy answers. If anything, her work raises more questions than it resolves. Her portraits don’t force conclusions; they offer a pause, an opportunity to rethink the narrative surrounding masculinity. It’s not about throwing out gender roles altogether, but rather expanding the script. What if masculinity didn’t have to look one way? What if it didn’t have to carry the heavy burden of invulnerability?

At the end of the day, Elizabeth isn’t just painting men. She’s painting the complexities of being human, and yes, that means confronting gender roles head-on. She’s giving us a chance to reflect, to ask why we’ve let certain norms define us for so long, and maybe—just maybe—she’s suggesting that it’s time to rewrite the script altogether. If you leave her work with more questions than answers, that’s exactly what she intended. After all, sitting in the uncertainty is part of the process.

Catherine Opie: Portraits, Politics, and the Reinvention of Gender Roles

If you’re not familiar with Catherine Opie, you might want to prepare yourself—she is the punk rock of contemporary photography, with her camera acting as both a scalpel and a megaphone. She uses it to cut open the social constructs we all live by—gender roles being one of her favorite topics—and then loudly broadcasts the complexities she finds within.

Over the past few decades, Opie has cemented herself as one of the most influential photographers of our time, using her lens to explore the fluidity of gender, sexuality, and identity, often in ways that force viewers to confront their own biases. And let’s be clear—her work isn’t just a polite inquiry into the norms of gender roles. It’s a full-on interrogation.

Portraits form the backbone of her work. In them, Opie captures people in all their unvarnished glory, defying the conventions of traditional portraiture. Her subjects range from drag kings and leather daddies to suburban soccer moms, each one revealing a complexity that’s often hidden beneath the surface.

Opie’s subjects are unapologetic in their defiance of gender expectations. The gaze is confrontational, daring viewers to reconcile the discomfort they might feel. This is not the male gaze, the female gaze, or any familiar gaze—perhaps it’s the gaze of liberation?

Her work isn’t just about the extremes of gender expression; it’s also about the spaces in between. In her series Being and Having (1991), Opie features close-up portraits of her friends donning fake facial hair. It’s a visual prank of sorts—a way of playing with masculinity and calling attention to how gender performance can be just that, a performance. The subjects smirk knowingly at the camera, as if they’re in on the joke. But it’s a joke with serious implications: Who decides what masculinity looks like? And why does it matter if someone opts to switch it up? (By the way, if you’d like to see this piece, it’s at MoMA.)

This playful approach to gender fluidity finds a more subtle counterpart in her later work, like Domestic (1999), where Opie traveled across the country photographing lesbian families in their homes. These portraits are quietly revolutionary, showcasing queer women in everyday domestic settings, far removed from the hyper-sexualized or marginalized portrayals that queer people have traditionally faced.

Opie’s work disrupts the narrative of traditional family structures and gender roles, presenting alternative realities where women can be heads of households and men can be nurturing, soft, and everything in between. By presenting these images as mundane—everyday moments, really—Opie normalizes what society often still considers “other.”

What makes her work so compelling is her ability to blur boundaries—not just between gender roles, but between the personal and the political. Her portraits of queer subcultures, domestic spaces, and sprawling urban landscapes all share a common thread: they force us to reconsider how identity is constructed and constrained by societal norms.

In a world where gender roles are often presented as binary and immutable, Opie’s work insists on the opposite. Gender is fluid, complex, and, most importantly, deeply personal.

The Evolution of Gender Roles Through the Lens of Contemporary Art

Once upon a time, when gender roles were as rigid as your great-grandmother’s idea of a “good woman,” art didn’t exactly do much to challenge the status quo. Men were strong, stoic, and usually naked, flexing their marble pecs while lounging against a column. Women were delicate, mysterious, also naked—possibly clutching a fruit or draped in gauze for reasons no one understood. This was the art world’s version of a gender reveal: blue for boys, pink for girls, and absolutely no room for discussion.

Fast forward to today, where contemporary art has flipped this outdated narrative on its well-sculpted head. Artists are taking a sledgehammer to traditional gender roles, deconstructing them, and rearranging the pieces into a complex mosaic.

Let’s Get Real About Gender

Before we dive in, let’s clear up one thing: the binary system is, to put it mildly, passé. We’ve evolved—or at least, we’re trying to. The idea that men have to act like emotionless human tanks and women should be delicate little fawns has, thankfully, been tossed in the nearest dumpster. It’s in this glorious aftermath of the gender revolution that contemporary artists are doing some of their best work.

Take someone like Elizabeth Bergeland, whose portraits of men expose a vulnerability that traditional art has long suppressed, replacing those chiseled jaws and piercing stares with something softer, more human.

And she’s not alone. Artists from all walks of life are exploring the cracks in our gender expectations, and the results are as varied as they are visually compelling. It’s almost as if someone finally handed the art world a mirror and said, “Take a good look at yourself.”

The Male Gaze Is So Last Century

If you’re even remotely familiar with feminist theory, you’ve likely heard the term “male gaze” thrown around. It’s that thing where women are depicted through the lens of a male perspective, often reduced to little more than objects of desire or vessels for procreation (and, apparently, for holding fruit).

But things are changing. The female gaze is here, and it’s ensuring that both men and women are given space to exist beyond stereotypes. Artists like Jordan Casteel are leading the charge, capturing portraits of Black men that reflect a quiet dignity and complexity often absent in mainstream depictions. Casteel’s work allows her subjects to simply be—vulnerable, contemplative, and yes, fully clothed.

Her work, like many others, reminds us that masculinity doesn’t have to come with a side of aggression, and femininity doesn’t have to be equated with weakness. It’s not about swapping roles; it’s about expanding the spectrum.

When Femininity Means Power

And then there’s the matter of femininity. Traditionally, being “feminine” meant being soft, nurturing, and—for the love of all that is good—silent. But today’s artists aren’t playing that game. Instead, they’re using femininity as a vehicle for power, autonomy, and expression. Artists like Mickalene Thomas flip the script, reclaiming the representation of Black women in art by placing them front and center, exuding strength and independence. Thomas’s subjects stare directly at the viewer, daring you to look away, to ignore their presence, their beauty, their complexity.

It’s the ultimate power move—an unapologetic reclamation of what femininity can look like when it’s not being filtered through centuries of patriarchal nonsense.

Non-Binary Artists: Changing the Game

But what about those who fall outside the binary? Non-binary and gender-fluid artists are the ultimate disruptors in the conversation about gender. Think of artists like Alok Vaid-Menon, whose multimedia work explores the nuances of being neither exclusively male nor female. Through their art, Alok challenges viewers to confront their own assumptions about gender, beauty, and identity.

Their performances, poetry, and visual art highlight the limitations of a society that insists on fitting people into categories. By breaking down these categories, non-binary artists are expanding the conversation beyond male and female, creating space for identities that exist in the in-between.

Art as a Mirror

So, where does all this leave us? In short, art has become a mirror—one that reflects not just where we are, but where we’re going. Gender roles, once rigid and unyielding, are now fluid, complex, and, let’s be honest, a bit messy. But that’s the beauty of it. Contemporary art isn’t here to give us answers or wrap things up in a tidy little bow. It’s here to make us think, to question, and maybe even to get a little uncomfortable.

As artists continue to push the boundaries of what gender means, they’re also pushing us to reconsider our own preconceived notions. What does it mean to be a man? A woman? Neither? Both? The answers, much like the art itself, are as diverse and multifaceted as the people asking the questions.

On a Personal Note...

An MCL sprain isn't fun.

See you next week!

Pato