BPM in Asset Management: concepts, benefits and a concrete example.
Juan J. Moreno
Founder Flokzu | INTEGRADOC | Lithium Software. Entrepreneur. Angel Investor. University Professor. Engineer, MBA, PhD.
We have seen a notorious fit of Flokzu and business process management technology ( BPM and Workflow ) in asset management companies. This acceptance occurs for the most obvious reason: the benefits are evident, quick to achieve and cost-effective.
Certainly, we have seen administrative processes of diverse nature implemented in clients from Panama, Colombia, Uruguay, Mauritius, and Chile, among other countries. These processes include investment management, regulatory compliance, risk management, and general back-office operations. In addition, portfolio management, customer service, IT incidents, development of new products and strategies, and customer relationship management are highlighted. The efficient integration of these processes with the company's central systems and different teams is crucial for success in the - increasingly - dynamic asset management sector.
This article will present a very simplified example of a process in this industry. We will identify the concepts that support the success of BPM technology in this type of company. And we will review the key elements to consider for a quick and smooth implementation project.
Administrative processes before a BPM Suite
Before the incorporation of BPM technology, back-office processes in asset management companies were often manual and relied heavily on communication via phone, email, and other traditional means.
Back-office employees communicated with clients or each other through phone calls, emails, or WhatsApp messages. Naturally, these mechanisms took time to set up, often involving long waits (on the phone online or waiting for a response). Additionally, information could be misinterpreted or lost during the conversation or due to typing errors. There was often no record of the interactions through these channels, making monitoring and accountability difficult.
In the case of emails, mailboxes tended to fill up, making it difficult to find relevant information. Responses by this means were not instantaneous and were often delayed. Additionally, since the emails did not follow a uniform structure, information usually needed to be included, and the process was difficult to standardize. And, of course, the enormous difficulty was that the mailboxes were personal. Hence, the information stored there was not available to other company members, and the risk of being lost was high when the person left the company.
Finally, the use of paper support is still valid in some organizations. Naturally, the paper process is slow and error-prone. In addition, physical documents could be lost or damaged. Finally, the storage of paper documents requires physical space, no small aspect, and no negligible cost.
Money Withdrawal Process
The "Cash Out" process in asset management is a very good example of how to apply the BPM discipline and a BPM Suite in an asset management company.
This process is essential to meeting investors' liquidity needs. It usually begins with a client's request to withdraw a specific amount of their invested money. The request is reviewed and evaluated, and additional information and validations may be required until the disbursement is made to the client (or rejected).
领英推荐
The main tasks of the process
Relevant KPIs of the process
Like any process in a continuous improvement cycle, it is important to measure its performance using key performance indicators ( KPI's ) , identifying opportunities for improvement. Two important KPIs that should be defined for this process are:
Benefits of automating this and other processes.
Automating the described process or others in an asset management company using a no-code BPM Suite such as Flokzu offers several significant advantages compared to traditional manual execution methods.
In short, Flokzu simplifies and optimizes the withdrawal process by providing an agile, accurate, and transparent solution for clients and asset management teams.
Conclusion.
The implementation of no-code BPM technology in the Asset Management industry has significantly impacted operational efficiency and associated costs. Rapid implementation of custom processes has been achieved by allowing internal (non-IT) business users to design and automate workflows without requiring intensive programming. Adopting No-Code solutions based on the SaaS model has proven financially advantageous, reducing initial expenses by eliminating investments in infrastructure and licenses while providing the scalability necessary to operate in various markets efficiently.
This technological approach optimizes the costs associated with administrative processes for asset management and offers continuous adaptability. The ability to adjust workflows agilely in the face of changes in regulations or market dynamics gives companies a strategic advantage in a highly dynamic financial environment. In summary, Flokzu technology in asset management presents itself as a smart financial investment that provides efficiency, global scalability, and continuous adaptability.