Bottom-Up Approach to Global Biosecurity Risk Management: A Necessity

Biosecurity, the practice of safeguarding humans and their resources from biological threats has become increasingly critical in our interconnected world. Biological threats include any living organisms or their derivatives that can potentially cause harm. These threats ranging from plant and animal diseases to food safety hazards, are exacerbated by rising human populations and the unprecedented scale of international travel and movement of goods that are potential carriers of these organisms.

The COVID-19 pandemic, which struck just five years ago, indiscriminately infected millions and affected billions globally, highlighting the devastating impact such threats can have on human lives and their support systems. Historically, humanity has survived pandemics when our population was smaller and less interconnected. Today, our global mobility and density create ideal conditions for harmful organisms to spread, find new hosts, and establish themselves in new regions. Climate change is another significant factor contributing to the spread of harmful organisms and the emergence of new biosecurity threats.?The microbial threat is potentially immense and largely unknown; over a trillion species of microbes, both harmful and beneficial, remain unexplored. Despite the enormity of these potential threats, we have been fortunate to survive, thanks partly to significant biosecurity risk management efforts at international, national, and regional levels. However, complacency is not an option; we must remain vigilant and proactive in our approach to mitigate these risks.

Traditional biosecurity risks management measures have primarily relied on top-down approaches, implemented through international agreements, national policies, and regulatory frameworks. While these strategies are essential, they often fail to account for the complex and dynamic nature of biological threats. The increasing interconnectedness of our world means that a single breach in biosecurity can have far-reaching and devastating consequences. The COVID-19 pandemic is a potent reminder of these vulnerabilities. Our reliance on top-down biosecurity has created opportunities for harmful organisms, particularly microbes, to exploit weaknesses in our defences.

To effectively manage biosecurity risks in this new era, a bottom-up approach is not just beneficial but essential. This strategy involves empowering individuals, communities, and local stakeholders to take an active role in biosecurity efforts. By fostering a sense of ownership, we can develop biosecurity measures that are more context-specific, adaptable, and sustainable. A bottom-up approach involves localised risk management protocols tailored to the unique conditions of different regions. This method has several advantages:

1. Localised Knowledge: Farmers, livestock owners, and community members possess intimate knowledge of their local ecosystems that is vital for the assessment of potential biosecurity risks. Their involvement ensures that measures are relevant and practical.

2. Community Engagement: When communities are actively involved in biosecurity, they are more likely to take ownership of the measures, leading to higher compliance and sustainability.

3. Adaptability: Localised approaches can quickly adapt to changing conditions and emerging threats, providing a flexible and responsive biosecurity system.

Implementation of bottom-up biosecurity will entail different strategies and approaches in different regions. For regions with established biosecurity systems, integrating bottom-up approaches can further strengthen existing measures and mitigate risks. A comprehensive strategy should mandate biosecurity plans at all levels - from large-scale farms to individual households. Implementing basic protocols, such as personal hygiene practices, timely vaccinations, and on-site biosecurity measures, can effectively prevent the spread of harmful organisms. Making these protocols mandatory across all farms, whether government-run or privately owned, is crucial for building a robust biosecurity framework from the ground up.

In regions facing increasing biosecurity threats, particularly in food and feed production systems like Africa, a bottom-up approach is vital for ensuring food security. While African countries vary in their biosecurity capabilities, a continent-wide strategy involving local communities and stakeholders is essential. Given the porous nature of borders, prevention efforts at individual country borders may be less effective. Instead, a collaborative approach focused on post-border risk management and farm-level biosecurity vigilance could prove more practical and impactful.

In densely populated regions of the world like India, implementing farm-level biosecurity necessitates a flexible approach due to the small and contiguous nature of farm holdings. Here, the focus could shift to village-level biosecurity measures. Village-level initiatives can include training farmers on biosecurity best practices, establishing local surveillance systems for early detection of potential threats, and promoting hygiene measures to prevent the spread of harmful organisms.

Empowering local communities to monitor for potential threats, implement biosecurity measures, and promote biosecurity awareness can create a robust network of vigilance. This approach must be tailored to local feasibilities and resources to be effective. Such grassroots efforts, supported by national policies, can significantly bolster biosecurity and protect the livelihoods of millions who depend on agriculture.

Building a Resilient and Scalable Biosecurity Framework

Implementing a successful bottom-up approach to biosecurity risk management requires a concerted effort and support from various stakeholders across multiple levels. To create a resilient and scalable biosecurity framework, the following elements are crucial:

1. Robust Governance and Policy Support

Governments play a pivotal role in enabling and empowering local communities to participate effectively in biosecurity efforts. They must provide the necessary planning, resources, training, and infrastructure to facilitate this bottom-up approach. This includes:

  • Developing comprehensive biosecurity strategies that incorporate bottom-up elements and clearly define roles and responsibilities for local stakeholders.
  • Allocating dedicated funding and resources to support community-level biosecurity initiatives, such as training programs, surveillance systems, and awareness campaigns.
  • Establishing a regulatory framework that encourages and incentivises local participation in biosecurity efforts, while ensuring accountability and compliance.

2. Capacity Building and Knowledge Transfer

Effective capacity building and knowledge transfer are essential for equipping local communities with the necessary skills and expertise to implement biosecurity measures. In this regard, non-governmental organisations can play a vital role by:

  • Facilitating knowledge exchange and sharing of best practices among communities.
  • Providing technical assistance and training programs tailored to the specific needs and contexts of local stakeholders.

3. Leveraging Technology and Innovation

In the digital age, novel tools and technologies can be game-changers in enhancing the effectiveness and scalability of bottom-up biosecurity approaches, even in resource-constrained regions. Embracing innovation can amplify the impact of local efforts through:

  • Deploying mobile applications and digital platforms for real-time reporting, data collection, and information sharing among local communities and relevant authorities.
  • Utilising sensor networks and remote monitoring systems for early detection and surveillance of potential biosecurity threats.
  • Integrating data analytics and predictive modelling to identify risk patterns, inform decision-making, and enable proactive response strategies.

4. Continuous Improvement and Adaptation

Given the dynamic nature of biological threats and the potential for new challenges to emerge, it is crucial to foster a culture of continuous improvement and adaptation within the biosecurity framework. This can be achieved by:

  • Establishing robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to assess the effectiveness of bottom-up biosecurity measures and identify areas for improvement.
  • Encouraging regular stakeholder feedback and incorporating lessons learned from real-world experiences and evolving best practices.
  • Promoting research and development efforts to explore innovative solutions and stay ahead of emerging biosecurity risks.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has indeed been a wake-up call, emphasising the urgent need to enhance our biosecurity systems. While top-down approaches have their place, they must be complemented by bottom-up strategies that empower individuals, communities, and local stakeholders. By embracing this inclusive and collaborative approach, we can build a more resilient and sustainable biosecurity system, capable of protecting human lives, preserving biodiversity, and ensuring food security for generations to come.

Currently, the world spends over US $24 trillion on military budgets. Redirecting a portion of these funds to biosecurity could safeguard humanity from real threats — harmful organisms and the biosecurity risks they pose to the safety, well-being, and sustainability of humans and the resources they depend on for their survival and well-being.

Adopting a bottom-up approach to biosecurity risk management and fostering a global biosecurity culture, where governments, businesses, communities, and individuals share responsibility, is not just a necessity; it is the foundation for a safer and more secure future against the ever-evolving landscape of biological threats.

_____________________

Anupam Varma

Adjunct Professor at Indian Agricultural Reseach Institute

9 个月

Thanks, Shashi, for your article on 'biosecurity risk management'. Now, there is sufficient evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic resulted from the "gain of function research" in a lab that was not fully equipped for such research. However, I agree 100% that there is a need for a greater emphasis on microbial research, and putting biosafety measures in place. There is also the need to create public awareness and actively involve various stakeholders.

subhash chand

SATYAM SHIVAM SUNDARAM

10 个月

very exellent information

RAJAN RAJAN

Principal Scientist (Nematology) at Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India

10 个月

Not many scientists have thought of both approaches, in fact both play crucial roles in ensuring effective national plant biosecurity. While the?bottom-up approach?engages individuals and communities, the?top-down approach?provides a regulatory framework.?Ideally, an effective combination of both approaches leads to comprehensive and robust biosecurity measures. A complete technical national and international guideline for on shore, offshore examination, pest risk analysis, survey surveillance methodology for alien pests and above all how to manage alien pests when they are detected for the first time, in a limited area; need to be spell out by a group of experts. Perhaps IPPC, WTO, WHO and STDC need to be made aware of the depth of guidelines required and seriousness of issues. [email protected]

Brendan Mahoney

Director at Broomhill Pastoral

10 个月

Another bloke hell bent on creating another layer of beaurocrisy with bio security! Listen up! Farmers will not participate in your mandates because you don’t understand. Do you know what 5in 1 is? Do you know what Stray 19 is? Do you know what Yonis disease is? We (farmers) take bio security more seriously than anyone in government or than you do. Our livelihoods dept on it. You work for a year and hand over $30K for nothing….. yeah…. Work for a year for nothing! Absolutely a joke? For you maybe, when farmers do this once or twice every 10 years. Political BS is the biggest threat to farm bio security because political BS is our biggest threat to our sustainability. Ask a sheep farmer in WA about farm bio security for their sheep! We can handle fire floods and drought but we can’t handle you or a Labour/Green government.

回复
Nirupama Sharma

Policy Advocacy I Government Affairs I Scientific Credibility I Partnerships I Stakeholder Management I Capacity Building

10 个月

Very well written

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Shashi B. Sharma的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了