Bots and Banks
In the future, bots will negotiate for us.

Bots and Banks

Back in 2019, I wrote a piece for Wired predicting that in time robots will take over in banking just as they have done in manufacturing. I said that going to the bank is just the sort of boring and time-consuming thing that robots should be doing instead of people, which is why I went on to predict that:


the big change in financial services will come not when banks are using AI, but when customers are.


In Forbes back in 2020 I doubled down on that prediction, saying that the battle for future businesses will take place in a landscape across which their bots will roam to negotiate with their counterparts (i.e., other bots at regulated financial institutions) to obtain the best possible product for their "owners". At the time, I thought this was a 3-5 year trend and I was using it in workshops with advisory clients and boards to help set the outlines for medium-term strategy in the sector.

That was before ChatGPT.

No alt text provided for this image
with kind permission of Helen Holmes (CC-BY-ND 4.0)

You will have noticed that ChatGPT (GPT stands for “generative pre-trained transformer”) has blown up. It got its first million users signed up in five days. An open-source, end-to-end dialogue system built on top of the GPT-3 language model, it is designed to enable developers to quickly build and deploy conversational AI agents for chatbots, virtual assistants, and other interactive applications. It is so named because it is powered by the GPT-3 language model, which is a powerful natural language processing (NLP) model that can generate human-like text from a few words of input.

(Fortunately, for me at least, ChatGPT told the BBC that it would not take over the work of human writers, but would help them by providing suggestions and ideas leaving the human writer to create the final product. As an experiment to test this, I wrote one of the paragraphs for this article using ChatGPT. I’ll tell you which one at the end.)

Now I see on Twitter that donotpay, “the world’s first robot lawyer”, which was created by Stanford University student Joshua Browder to help people to contest parking tickets, is about to launch a browser extension where customers can type something like “negotiate my cable bill down” and have a GPT-powered bot engage with their cable provider on their behalf.

Something that I thought was a couple of years away is happening right now and it is absolutely fascinating!


In this kind of environment, the key question for customers will become a question of which bot they want to work with, not which bank.


My view, and I have to say that it is a tangential and uninformed view since I know almost nothing about marketing and even less about artificial general intelligence, is that people will tend to choose bots on the basis of moral and ethical frameworks. We will see Green Bots, Christian Bots, Pro-Choice Bots and who knows what other kinds of bots capable of informing choices within such frameworks. I used the examples of the AARP Automaton, the Buffett Bot and the Megatron Musk, all of which sounded plausible to me!

Once customers have chosen their bots, why would they risk making suboptimal choices around their financial health by interfering in the artificial brain's decisions? Think about it. As things stand, I am required to make decisions about my financial health while I am the least qualified entity in the loop!

Here is an obvious case study. Like most middle-class fintech bloggers, my pensions are by far and away the most important financial product in my life. I am also a reasonably intelligent person, yet in any conversation with my financial advisor, I very quickly sink into a miasma of government rules about pensions, complex taxation arrangements and risk-related investment decisions. I have absolutely no reason to believe that I can make the right decisions and would much prefer a super-intelligent bot to work with my financial advisor (well, my financial advisor’s bot) to plot the correct course through these difficult financial waters.

It seems to me that in day-to-day life there are only two categories of retail financial transactions. There are the transactions that are too boring for people to do and transactions that are too complicated for people to understand. In both cases, the bots stand ready to help and given the rapid advances in technology, I don’t think I’ll have to wait too much longer.

(If you are curious, by the way, I used ChatGPT to write the paragraph describing what ChatGPT is. We are down the rabbit hole, for sure!)


Book Dave

Are you looking for:

  • A speaker/moderator for your online or in person event?
  • Written content or contribution for your publication?
  • A trusted advisor for your company’s board?
  • Some comment on the latest digital financial services news/media?


Get in touch by clicking on the image above


Steve Everhard

Partner at Adrenaline Capital Partners LLP

1 年

Is going to the bank common? The last time I went to the bank I was surprised to find it wasn't there anymore. In the meantime, got your bot to talk to my bot...

回复
Wayne Brown

?? I help financial services businesses with strategy and transformation that creates revenue, improves service, and lowers cost. ?? GET IN TOUCH

1 年

Using robots in negotiations is already happening in certain contexts, such as online chatbots for customer service. However, in more complex negotiations that involve strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, and human judgement, the role of humans is still critical. Trust is integral to banking. It is an extraordinarily complex emotion. I don't think that humans are ready (yet) to trust robots entirely to run their finances. But that's not to say that it can't happen somewhere in the future. As people relax into AI being part of their everyday lives, it will begin to be used in ways that we can't yet comprehend.

Guy Huntington

Trailblazing Human and Entity Identity & Learning Visionary - Created a new legal identity architecture for humans/ AI systems/bots and leveraged this to create a new learning architecture

1 年

Hi David, Readers might want to skim this, “AI Leveraged Smart Digital Identities of Us” -?https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/ai-leveraged-smart-digital-identities-us-guy-huntington/ Guy ??

Frank Trotter

President at Battle Bank

1 年

While it's all about the timing, that seems like the way it will go. One key potential bot choice will be who is the product - you the user or the bot. A free bot will continue and enhance the data collection for sale model, a paid bot potentially can enhance privacy providing only the minimum required information. Once available, on the timing side this appears to be the implementation of David Chaum's personal representative. I'll take the privacy version please. https://chaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ScientificAmerican-AEP.pdf

Viktor Legetsky

Fintech & web3 expert | Mentor | Advisor | Investor

1 年

bots are a great tool, but only if it's smart and secure enough

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David Birch的更多文章

  • I Am A Person: The Bank Says So

    I Am A Person: The Bank Says So

    When you go to a website and are asked to distinguish between a moped and a motorcycle (rather pointlessly, as it…

    36 条评论
  • Apple Opens Up

    Apple Opens Up

    You need a digital wallet strategy. Last year, Apple announced that any third-party wallet can now build on Apple’s…

    22 条评论
  • QR Codes Are A Fraud Risk

    QR Codes Are A Fraud Risk

    Fifty years on from the invention of the barcode, it’s time to move on. Jet Propelled On 26th June 1974, the first…

    43 条评论
  • My Phone Was Stolen, I Survived

    My Phone Was Stolen, I Survived

    Claer Barrett, writing about the theft of her mobile phone in the Financial Times, summarises our modern age…

    17 条评论
  • There Is No Excuse For Biometric Honeypots

    There Is No Excuse For Biometric Honeypots

    I’m sure that responsible commentators on the world of digital finance are not supposed to have a favourite data…

    16 条评论
  • Make It Until You Can Fake It

    Make It Until You Can Fake It

    I’m sorry to say that I’d never heard of the British pop star FKA Twigs, but I was fascinated by her testimony to a US…

    12 条评论
  • Consultants Don’t Know About The Future, Artists Do

    Consultants Don’t Know About The Future, Artists Do

    During an excellent fireside chat about the future of payments at Money20/20 Asia in Bangkok earlier this year Farhan…

    9 条评论
  • JPMorgan Chase Are Bullish On Biometrics, And I Am Too

    JPMorgan Chase Are Bullish On Biometrics, And I Am Too

    JPMorgan Chase is planning a broad roll out of biometric payments with US retailers by early next year, enabling…

    23 条评论
  • Ice, Ice, AI

    Ice, Ice, AI

    At Money20/20 in Las Vegas this year, I was kindly invited to a “fireside chat” with Sophia Bantanidis from Citi. I was…

    12 条评论
  • Apple Introduce Post-Quantum Security. You Should Be Thinking About This Too.

    Apple Introduce Post-Quantum Security. You Should Be Thinking About This Too.

    Apple have introduced new security to their iMessage service in the form of the PQ3 protocol, an end-to-end encrypted…

    10 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了