Boomerang employees - should you hire old staff back?
Skillfinder International
Technology And Business Recruitment To The Finance And Banking Industry Worldwide
Gone are the days when it was taboo to rehire people who left an organisation because they were seen as disloyal. But when you’re faced with deciding whether to rehire someone, what do you do?
A quick Google will find you plenty of articles that confirm your gut feeling that rehiring is a no-brain decision. But a recent study of more than 30,000 subjects suggests you should tread carefully and that welcoming old staff back is not usually the best decision when you’ve got alternatives.
The benefits seem obvious - less risk, reduced recruitment costs, less training required, a more committed employee… but these assumptions were really a matter of opinion as nobody had done any detailed research into the subject until this year. A study published in the?Journal of Management?looked into ‘boomerang employees’ - people who leave and come back to an organisation - and whether rehiring them is a good staffing strategy.?
The short answer - probably not.?
The study looked into two main questions:
1.?Do boomerang employees improve their performance at work after they return to a company?
2. How do the performance levels and rates of turnover compare to a) people recruited internally and b) new external candidates?
The main findings:
Should you still think about rehiring employees?
It’s not worth hiring someone back if you’re relying on some renewed energy and insight that will see them outperform their previous self at your company. However, if the way they performed and acted before was satisfactory and comparable to other candidates available to you, then you may well reap the assumed benefits mentioned above and save a lot of time and hassle in on boarding your new (old) employee.
The study suggests that what a candidate who used to work for the company will do - how they behave, the way they communicate, their performance, what their attitude is like etc. - is likely to be consistent with what happened in their previous engagement.Soit would make sense to look into their previous employment with yourorganisationand how their performance went over time. You should also explore their time at the company when talking to your boomerang candidate when it comes to the interview and selection process.
Why did the boomerang candidate leave in the first place? You should look into whether the issues that led them to leave last time have been resolved, because the research shows they’re likely to resign for the same reasons if not.?
Originally published on Skillfinder International's blog by Grant Brummer.
CEO & Founder of UNVAELD: An award-winning workplace Diversity & Inclusion hub with FREE professional help | NatWest's top 30 start-ups to watch out for in 2024 ?? | Let's Connect!?
3 年I think it really depends on their reason for leaving. It is definitely a good shout when it comes to cutting costs and in some cases, the former employees might come in with an even better attitude and more motivation because you've given them a second chance!
interesting topic. Agreed that former employees don't usually change their behaviours, but sometimes they may click better with a different manager and it could be a case of motivation rather than attitude.