Books, Bureaucracy, and Budget Blunders: Rethinking Value for Money

Last weekend, my wife and I stepped into another world—a quiet, sacred space where history and knowledge breathe together. Marsh’s Library in Dublin, hidden away from the bustling modern streets, welcomed us with an old-world charm that immediately set it apart from any other library I had visited before.

There is something about the weight of history in a place like this. Unlike the grandeur of the Trinity College Library, which dazzles thousands of visitors each day, Marsh’s Library has an intimacy that makes it feel like a secret. The shelves, lined with ancient tomes, are untouched by time, and the air carries the scent of paper and ink, aged yet preserved with care. Here, books are not merely objects; they are whispers from the past, held in the same bindings as they were centuries ago.

I traced my fingers along the wooden shelves, my mind racing with the thought that Bram Stoker and James Joyce had done the same. I imagined Joyce, in 1902, buried in the pages of medieval texts, and Stoker perhaps drawing eerie inspiration for his gothic masterpiece. There’s a kind of magic in knowing that these literary giants once stood here, breathed this air, and absorbed knowledge from these very books.

One of the most fascinating parts of the library was the reading cages. The idea that readers, centuries ago, had to be locked inside these wire enclosures to prevent them from slipping books into their coats fascinated me. It was a reminder of how precious knowledge was—and still is. Standing before them, I couldn’t help but picture scholars of the past, bent over fragile manuscripts, lost in their studies, oblivious to the passage of time.

Marsh’s Library is not just a collection of books; it is a monument to learning, a place where knowledge is protected, cherished, and respected. Unlike the fast-paced digital world we live in today, this space demands patience, reverence, and curiosity. It is a sanctuary where time slows down, where words are not just read but absorbed, where one is reminded of why we study, why we seek knowledge, and why books continue to matter.

Yet, as I walked out of the library, carrying with me a deep sense of gratitude, another thought lingered—why do we so often fail to recognise the real value of places like this? In an era where public funds are spent with such ease on projects of questionable necessity, how do we justify the modest funding allocated to our cultural institutions while millions are wasted elsewhere?

Take, for example, the recent public procurement projects in Ireland that have come under scrutiny for their exorbitant costs. The €1.4 million security hut outside the Department of Finance. The €491,000 wall outside the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC). The €336,000 bicycle shed at Leinster House. Each of these projects has drawn public outcry, not just for their inflated price tags but for what they represent—carelessness with taxpayer money and a fundamental misunderstanding of what real value means.

The €1.4 million security hut, intended to bolster security at the Department of Finance, has become a symbol of excess. The €491,000 wall outside the WRC—a structure meant to replace an old one—ended up costing more than double the initial estimate, with each meter of the wall priced at nearly €7,000. And the bicycle shed at Leinster House, built to accommodate just 36 bicycles, was so outrageously expensive that even government leaders called it “inexcusable.”

These expenditures stand in stark contrast to the modest funding given to institutions like Marsh’s Library, which in 2021 received a grant of €410,000 from the Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport, and Media. This is a library that safeguards centuries of knowledge, provides an invaluable resource to scholars, and represents a tangible link to our literary past. And yet, it must rely heavily on donations and limited grants to survive, while unnecessary government projects receive millions with little scrutiny.

What does this say about our priorities? Have we lost sight of what true value means?

The real tragedy of wasteful spending is not just the wasted money itself, but what that money could have done elsewhere. Every euro funnelled into an over-budget security hut or an overpriced bicycle shed is a euro that could have been used to preserve a historic site, fund an educational program, or ensure that institutions like Marsh’s Library continue to exist for future generations. When we fail to invest in our cultural heritage, we lose something far greater than money—we lose a part of who we are.

We need to think differently about value for money. Public spending should not be about extravagance or optics but about genuine investment in things that matter—education, culture, and the preservation of our shared history. If we are to build a future that honours our past, we must ensure that we are not squandering our resources on projects that offer little long-term benefit.

Marsh’s Library is a reminder of the power of history, of the written word, and of the quiet places where knowledge is truly treasured. It deserves more than what it gets. And if we are serious about preserving the cultural fabric of our nation, it is time we start demanding better choices from those who control the purse strings.

?