Bonds In Neverland

Bonds In Neverland

The negative interest rate policies of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of Japan (BOJ) have created a Neverland in the global fixed-income markets. An 8/18 Bloomberg story reported: “The world’s headlong dash to zero or negative interest rates just passed another milestone: Homebuyers in Denmark effectively are being paid to take out 10-year mortgages. Jyske Bank A/S, Denmark’s third-largest lender, announced in early August a mortgage rate of -0.5%, before fees. Nordea Bank Abp, meanwhile, is offering 30-year mortgages at annual interest of 0.5%, and 20-year loans at zero.”

A 7/29 story in The Washington Times reported: “The latest estimates are that approximately 30 percent of the global government bond issues are now trading in negative territory. Last week, Swiss 50-year borrowing costs fell below zero percent, which means that Switzerland’s entire government bond market now trades with negative yields. Earlier in the month, Denmark became the country to have its entire yield curve turn negative.”

During 2018, when the 10-year US Treasury bond yield was rising toward last year’s high of 3.24% on 11/8, there was much chatter about its going to 4%-5%. For example, on 8/4 at the Aspen Institute's 25th Annual Summer Celebration Gala, JP Morgan Chase Chief Jamie Dimon warned that the 10-year US Treasury bond yield could go much higher: “I think rates should be 4% today. You better be prepared to deal with rates 5% or higher—it's a higher probability than most people think.”

At the time, the bears worried about mounting federal deficits, resulting from the tax cuts at the beginning of the year, at the same time that the Fed was on track for more QT. In addition, there was mounting evidence that inflationary pressures were building, with some related to Trump’s tariffs.

In my 8/8/18 daily commentary, I wrote: “So why isn’t the US bond yield soaring? The bulls respond that trying to forecast the bond market using flow-of-funds supply-vs-demand analysis has never worked. It’s fairly obvious that US bond yields are tethered to comparable German and Japanese yields, which are near zero, and are likely to remain there given the stated policies of both the ECB and BOJ to keep their official rates near zero for the foreseeable future.”

The tether has gotten tighter since last year’s peak in the US bond yield on 11/8. Since then, the US bond yield has dropped 164bps to 1.60% on Monday, while the comparable German and Japanese yields are down 111bps to -0.65% and 36bps to -0.23%, respectively.

Now consider the following related developments in the US bond market:

(1) Tipping into negative territory. The 10-year TIPS yield dropped to zero on Monday, suggesting that the nominal yield reflects only inflation expectations with no real yield. The TIPS yield could be about to turn negative, as it did in 2012.

(2) Real rates and productivity. Why should the real bond yield be negative or even zero? The most widely accepted notion is that the real bond yield should be related to the growth rate in productivity, which is the economy’s real return, arguably. The correlation between the two—using averages over five-year time periods—is not compelling, though. In any event, productivity growth has been turning up over the past few years. Productivity has been growing faster in the US than in the other G7 economies.

(3) Demography is destiny. The geriatric trend in global demographic profiles does support a case for negative nominal and real interest rates if the trend leads to a combination of slow growth and deflation. That’s if deflation reduces the value of assets purchased today with debt. Negative interest rates on that debt might reflect the voluntary self-extinction of the human race attributable to the collapse of fertility rates around the world. Dwindling populations, particularly of younger people, will put downward pressure on real asset prices, because there will be less demand for the goods and services they provide in the future.

Dr. Ed is one of LinkedIn's 2018 Top Voices in economy & finance. Institutional investors may sign-up at https://lnkd.in/eYNwch8 for a trial to his research service. His book, Predicting the Markets, is on Amazon.



Subhashis Bhattacharjee

CTO/Co-founder: XCELER, TIPL; startup enthusiast; NCSTian;BITian;tenderfoot author

5 年

It’s not anymore possible to hide the underlying problems in EU economy. It’s been tried by some countries like Germany to protect their neighbouring consumer for longer term benefits but how long. Some counties don’t have any domestic produce and completely rely on legacy of wealth and foreign money that they built long back, which is slowly eroding, other countries are pushing global pressure by new policies to get back their money or at least stop money export as well as another bigger factor trade and services competition with efficient countries.

Jeffrey Chiu, CFA

Chief Financial Officer, Trendspot, Inc.

5 年

As an MBA student in 2000, I was taught discounted cash flow valuation models as the very foundation of finance itself that assumes positive risk free interest rates. Japan at the time teetered near zero rates and my professors would say that it was an isolated case caused by unique characteristics of Japan such as aging demographics, savings preference, and homogeneous population that does not apply to the rest of the world. Sounds like quite the reverse is true as now the world is actually turning Japanese with Germany going even further than Japan has ever gone into Neverland. Question is, "Does the Japanese experience foreshadow things to come for everyone else?" While reading this article, The Vapors song "Turning Japanese" keeps ringing in my head. https://lnkd.in/g8VTcQS? #negativerates #turningjapanese

David Mieczkowski, PhD

Chief Investment Officer - AgAmerica

5 年

The correlation between 5 yr TIPs yields and forward productivity is actually very high. Collapsing TIPs yields signals markets think productivity will be very low over the next several years.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了