A Blueprint for Ending Gender-Based Violence within Australian Residential Colleges
Dr Eshan Arya
Deputy Head & Dean at International House, Melbourne | Board Member | Expert in Student Welfare, Public Policy & International Relations
In the contemporary landscape of higher education, where gender-based violence (GBV) presents a significant challenge, the Australian Universities Accord Final Report addresses this pressing issue through several vital sections, highlighting the urgent need for action and reform within higher education institutions.
Immediate Commitment to Act on Priority 5 of the Interim Report: This section discusses the critical need to address gender-based violence, emphasizing the current inadequacies in support and care for victim-survivors within institutions. It references the Australian Government's Draft Action Plan to Address Gender-based Violence in Higher Education, released for public consultation. This comprehensive plan outlines actions, including establishing a new National Student Ombudsman and strengthening provider accountability for issues related to gender-based violence, aiming to foster safer and more inclusive educational environments.
Government Response to Priority Action 5 from the Interim Report: This part of the report outlines the government's response to concerns about psychosocial stress in higher education workplaces, focusing on the safety and well-being of students and staff. It highlights the establishment of a cross-jurisdictional working group dedicated to strengthening university governance, particularly in ensuring safety against sexual assault and sexual harassment, thereby underlining the importance of creating a supportive academic atmosphere for all.
These sections and the initiatives they propose collectively lay the foundation for addressing and preventing gender-based violence within higher education institutions. The "Action Plan Addressing Gender-based Violence in Higher Education" is a pivotal guide for implementing substantive reforms. It offers a structured approach for residential colleges to create safer and more inclusive environments, facilitating unencumbered educational pursuits and personal development. By advocating for systemic reforms, such as instituting a National Student Ombudsman and promoting a culture of respect and inclusivity, the plan stresses the need for a steadfast institutional commitment.
I thereby analyse and suggest implementation strategies exploring how colleges might operationalize these strategies, revealing that success hinges on our collective capacity for collaboration, flexibility, and a deep-seated dedication to safety and equality across the academic sphere. This concerted effort is essential for cultivating an academic environment where all individuals can thrive, free from the threats of violence and discrimination.
Action 1: Establish a National Student Ombudsman
Implementation Strategy: The implementation strategy for establishing a National Student Ombudsman to address gender-based violence in higher education begins with advocating for its creation through lobbying policymakers, engaging student bodies, and collaborating with organizations focused on education and gender equality, using models like Sweden's National Agency for Higher Education as a blueprint. Gaining legislative support is essential, involving drafting proposals to include the Ombudsman's role in educational laws. The appointment process must be transparent, selecting candidates with expertise in gender studies, regulation, or education and equipped to handle sensitive issues. Finally, widespread dissemination of information on accessing the Ombudsman's services is crucial, utilizing social media, university platforms, newsletters, and student orientations to ensure all students are informed.
The Australian National Tertiary Education Union's advocacy for safe campuses and its guidelines highlight the potential framework for establishing an independent Ombudsman as a practical model. Research further supports this approach, indicating that a dedicated entity for grievance handling enhances the reporting and management of gender-based violence in higher education. A notable study in the Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management reveals an increased likelihood of incident reporting among students who trust in a fair and confidential resolution process, underscoring the critical role such a body plays in fostering a safer educational environment.
The establishment of a National Student Ombudsman to address gender-based violence in higher education is anticipated to significantly increase incident reporting by providing students with a comfortable and supportive avenue for coming forward, thereby enhancing trust in institutional commitments to safety and improving campus climate. This role is also vital in implementing preventive measures through education and awareness, potentially reducing such incidents. However, challenges like the substantial resources required for establishing and maintaining the Ombudsman's office and potential cultural resistance within institutions due to a lack of awareness or understanding about the importance of combating gender-based violence pose hurdles. Despite these challenges, strategic planning, advocacy, and collaboration are essential for this initiative's successful implementation and potential positive impact in fostering safer, more inclusive educational environments.
Action 2: Embed a Whole-of-Organisation Approach
Implementation Strategy: Implementing a Whole-of-Organisation Approach in higher education to address gender-based violence represents a multifaceted strategy that necessitates a unified effort across all organizational levels. It combines leadership commitment, policy and practice overhaul, and targeted training to foster a culture that values respect, diversity, and inclusion. Key to this approach is the proactive engagement of leadership through initiatives like the "It's On Us" campaign, illustrating a public pledge against sexual assault by senior executives and governance boards. This is complemented by revising existing policies to align with gender equality objectives, exemplified by the University of Melbourne's Respectful Relationships Education program, and providing staff with expert-led training to handle gender-based violence disclosures effectively. Such comprehensive efforts aim not only to prevent gender-based violence but also to ensure a timely and sensitive response, thereby promoting a safer and more inclusive educational environment.
The Whole-of-Organisation Approach to addressing GBV in higher education encompasses a comprehensive strategy focused on culture change and inclusivity. It underlines the necessity for a fundamental shift in campus culture, advocating for a community that values diversity and inclusivity to combat GBV effectively. This approach integrates extensive education and awareness campaigns, such as workshops and online courses on consent and bystander intervention, alongside role modelling by leadership to challenge gender stereotypes and foster gender equality. Notable examples include the United Nations' "HeForShe" campaign and evidence from the Journal of College Student Development indicating that such cultural shifts can significantly reduce GBV incidents. The strategy also adopts an intersectional framework, ensuring policies and programs are inclusive of all genders and backgrounds, highlighted by initiatives like the University of California's sexual violence prevention training. Despite the challenges of resistance to change and the need for substantial resources, the approach aims to decrease GBV incidents, increase reporting and support, and engage the community in collective responsibility. The potential to create a safer and more equitable environment within higher education institutions aligns with broader societal goals of gender equality, demonstrating the profound impact of integrating culture change and inclusivity in combating GBV.
Action 3: Strengthen Provider Accountability
Implementation Strategy: Implementing Action 3 to combat gender-based violence in higher education requires a strategic and focused approach, including developing a new National Higher Education Code. This initiative mirrors efforts like the Universities UK's framework, emphasizing policy development, staff training, and the inclusion of evidence-based prevention programs such as "Bringing in the Bystander." It also mandates setting clear support and response services standards, drawing on best practices in trauma-informed care, and promoting transparent reporting mechanisms to ensure accountability. This comprehensive strategy involves understanding the root causes of gender-based violence, empowering students, supporting victims effectively, and maintaining transparency through tools like annual reports, akin to the Clery Act in the U.S., to monitor progress and challenges in addressing gender-based violence on campuses.
The implementation of a National Higher Education Code to address gender-based violence brings both positive impacts and challenges. Positively, it enhances prevention and response efforts through evidence-based strategies and clear standards, boosts trust within the academic community by promoting transparency and accountability, and influences broader policy changes. However, this approach faces hurdles such as the significant resources needed for development and execution, concerns over data privacy in transparent reporting, and the difficulty of maintaining consistent standards across diverse institutions. Despite these challenges, focusing on evidence-based prevention, setting clear service-level standards, and ensuring transparency are crucial steps towards significantly improving the fight against gender-based violence in higher education. However, success hinges on careful resource management, privacy considerations, and standardization of practices.
领英推荐
Action 4: Enhance Oversight of Student Accommodation Providers
Implementation Strategy: Enhancing oversight of student accommodation providers is crucial for preventing and responding to gender-based violence in higher education. This ensures that college-operated and independent accommodations meet stringent safety and support standards. The approach includes integrating compliance with national guidelines, like the UK's Universities UK Code of Practice, into operational policies for college-managed housing, emphasizing physical security, staff training, and student support services. Additionally, fostering collaboration between colleges and standalone accommodation providers is vital, potentially through regular strategy meetings, shared staff training, and agreements that align with the college's policies on gender-based violence. This comprehensive strategy aims to create a safer, more supportive environment for students across all forms of accommodation.
Enhancing oversight of student accommodation providers by ensuring adherence to a National Code offers significant benefits, including consistent safety standards, improved student support systems, and enhanced community awareness of gender-based violence, fostering a more secure and supportive environment. This strategy, involving collaboration between colleges and accommodation providers, aims to create a proactive culture towards preventing and addressing incidents of gender-based violence. However, it faces challenges such as achieving uniform compliance among diverse providers, addressing resource limitations, and balancing oversight with the need for privacy and confidentiality. Overcoming these obstacles is essential for colleges to provide safer living conditions and support for their students.
Action 5: Focus on Safety of Victim-Survivors
Implementation Strategy: Action 5 emphasizes the importance of a collaborative and systemic approach in enhancing the safety of victim-survivors of gender-based violence in higher education. This action requires cooperation with government bodies and other education providers to scrutinize and potentially revise existing laws, policies, and regulations to prioritize the safety and well-being of victim-survivors. Key to this strategy is effective collaboration with government agencies overseeing education, legal frameworks, and gender equality, as well as forming coalitions with other higher education institutions to establish sector-wide standards. This includes initiatives like "Changing the Culture" by Universities UK to prevent gender-based violence. Additionally, reviewing and amending legislation and policies, such as the "Campus Save Act" in the U.S., is critical in closing protection gaps and enhancing support for affected individuals, showcasing a concerted effort to create a more supportive environment for victim-survivors.
Focusing on the safety of victim-survivors of gender-based violence in higher education through the collaborative review and revision of legislation and policies represents a pivotal approach towards creating a safer and more supportive environment. This strategy promises to strengthen legal and policy frameworks, encouraging more victim-survivors to report incidents and fostering sector-wide improvements in safety and support. However, it faces significant challenges, including the complexity of enacting legal and policy changes, the need for substantial resources to implement new support services, and the difficulty of maintaining consistent standards across jurisdictions and institutions. Overcoming these obstacles is crucial for ensuring the effectiveness of this approach in combating gender-based violence and supporting victim-survivors across higher education.
Action 6: Demonstrate Improvement through Data Transparency
Implementation Strategy: Action 6 emphasizes improving responses to GBV in higher education through data transparency. This approach mandates regular and systematic data collection, analysis, and dissemination regarding GBV disclosures, reports, and outcomes, including participation in national surveys. The strategy underscores the necessity of balancing transparency with privacy, ensuring ethical data handling. Practices like the University of Cambridge's publication of annual reports on sexual misconduct, which offer anonymized data on incident reports, actions taken, and support for victims, exemplify this approach. Ensuring data integrity and comparability through standardized definitions and reporting formats is crucial for benchmarking and sharing best practices across institutions. Moreover, participating in national surveys like those conducted by the Australian Human Rights Commission illuminates the broader context of GBV in academia and society, showcasing institutional commitment to tackling the issue and enhancing collective understanding.
Data transparency in addressing GBV in higher education is crucial for enabling evidence-based decision-making, enhancing institutional accountability, and facilitating sector-wide learning by sharing data and best practices. However, this strategy faces challenges, including balancing transparency with privacy concerns, the resource-intensive nature of systematic data collection, and the risk of underreporting due to stigma and fear of reprisal. Despite these obstacles, a structured approach to data collection, commitment to data integrity, and participation in national surveys are essential for a comprehensive understanding of GBV issues. This complex but vital effort can significantly contribute to a more informed and responsive approach to preventing and addressing GBV, ensuring that interventions are effectively targeted and institutions remain accountable for their progress.
Action 7: Ongoing Commitment to Addressing Gender-Based Violence
Implementation Strategy: Action 7 advocates for a sustained commitment to combat GBV in higher education through continuous engagement in consultations, coordination, and progress reviews against a well-defined Action Plan. It underscores the importance of integrating diverse perspectives, including those of students, staff, and GBV experts, into the institution's strategy, as demonstrated by the University of British Columbia's annual community consultations. Monitoring progress through transparent benchmarks, like Monash University's public reporting, is essential for accountability. Moreover, participating in national efforts, such as those facilitated by the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA), highlights the dual focus on enhancing institutional practices and contributing to broader sectoral improvements. This strategic, dynamic approach is crucial for addressing the evolving challenges of GBV and meeting community needs effectively.
Implementing adaptive and responsive strategies through regular consultation ensures that GBV prevention and response in higher education are practical and relevant, fostering enhanced community trust and sector-wide influence by sharing best practices and knowledge. However, these efforts face challenges such as engagement fatigue, the need for substantial resource allocation, and difficulties in measuring the long-term impact of initiatives. Despite these challenges, a sustained commitment to tackling GBV is crucial for cultivating safer and more inclusive academic environments, highlighting the importance of balancing continuous improvement in strategies with the practicalities of implementation and impact assessment.
Conclusion:
The path forward requires courage, resilience, and perseverance. Institutions like the International House are tasked with implementing policies and embodying the principles of dignity, respect, and equality they stand for. As we move towards this goal, it is crucial to remember that addressing gender-based violence in higher education is not just about compliance or risk management; it is about nurturing environments where every student and staff member can thrive, free from fear and discrimination. The "Action Plan Addressing Gender-based Violence in Higher Education" presents a robust framework for change. While challenges remain, the potential for positive impact is immense. By embracing this comprehensive approach, institutions have the opportunity to lead by example, demonstrating that gender-based violence has no place in our societies. Through a concerted effort, dedication, and a commitment to justice and equality, we can envision a future where higher education is a haven for all, embodying the ideals of inclusivity and respect at the heart of academic pursuit.
?