Blockchain isn't a solution looking for a problem

In recent months, our conversations with financial institutions of all sizes have confirmed that tokenization of assets on the blockchain, in their eyes, is without a doubt the future.

Nevertheless, we are astonished to discover the limited understanding some have towards the broad implications asset tokenization can have. Im going to try and shed light on recent developments in this field and how companies are propelling financial progress and creating new value.

I want to try debunk any beliefs that blockchain is a solution looking for a problem; instead, over the next few weeks try to demonstrate how blockchain technology is transforming numerous sectors worldwide and resolving actual issues through well thought out use cases.

One such use case is LCR.

In today's fast-paced financial world, liquidity is key. Banks and other financial institutions must ensure that they have sufficient funds to meet their obligations at all times. To do this, they rely on a metric called the Liquidity Coverage Ratio ("LCR"), which measures their ability to withstand short-term liquidity stress. However, managing LCR can be complex and time-consuming. Fortunately, blockchain technology offers a streamlined solution for LCR management that could revolutionize the industry. In this blog post, I'll explore how blockchain can help simplify LCR management and what benefits it brings to financial institutions looking to improve their operations.

?

What is LCR Management?

LCR Management refers to the process by which financial institutions ensure that they have enough high-quality liquid assets ("HQLAs", yes that where the company HQLAX, a leading platform in Securities Finance and Repo got its name from) to meet their short-term obligations.

High-Quality Liquid Assets are reliable and easily convertible assets that can be used to meet short-term liquidity needs with minimal loss in value, even in times of financial stress. These typically include government securities, central bank reserves, and high-quality corporate bonds. To ensure that banks have sufficient HQLA to cover their expected net cash outflows during a 30-day stress scenario, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision set up the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) as part of the Basel III framework. The formula for the LCR is calculated by dividing a bank's stock of high-quality liquid assets by its total net cash outflows over the next 30 days; it must be maintained at 100%. This regulation provides banks with a buffer of liquid assets that can be rapidly converted into cash to honour their obligations, thus lowering the chances of experiencing a liquidity crisis.

The Liquidity Coverage Ratio is a key metric used in LCR management, and it requires banks to hold sufficient liquidity buffers based on their expected net cash outflows over a 30-day period. LCR calculation involves complex and dynamic analysis of various factors such as asset quality, market volatility, interest rates, etc. Banks must constantly monitor these factors and adjust their HQLA holdings accordingly to maintain adequate liquidity coverage. Failure to maintain an appropriate LCR can lead to dire consequences for banks and other financial institutions.

During times of crisis or economic downturns, those with insufficient HQLAs may struggle to meet customer demands or satisfy regulatory requirements leading towards insolvency. ?Managing LCR is essential for maintaining financial stability in today's fast-paced environment where disruptions are becoming more common than ever before.

What are the benefits of using blockchain for LCR Management?

Blockchain technology can help streamline LCR Management by providing a secure and transparent way to store, track, and manage financial data.

Using a public blockchain for LCR management has many advantages including:

1) Increased security : Blockchain technology offers enhanced security to LCR management via its decentralized and immutable ledger system. By distributing the ledger, potential points of failure are reduced while malicious actors struggle to manipulate or alter records. Cryptographic techniques provide data integrity and authenticity, which is essential for managing financially sensitive information and reducing the probability of fraud or cyber attacks.

2) Automation and efficiency : Automating LCR management processes using blockchain-based smart contracts eliminates the need for manual intervention and reduces human error. With these self executing contracts, actions can be automatically triggered based on real-time data by predefined rules and conditions. Automation streamlines processes such as collateral upgrading, asset valuation, and settlement, resulting in increased operational efficiency and cost savings.

3) Real time monitoring and transparency: LCR Management Process Transparency: Blockchain provides participants with a transparent view of the LCR management process by enabling real-time monitoring of transactions. Transparency and auditability are ensured by timestamped transactions recorded on blockchains. Real-time monitoring enables quicker decision making and proactive risk management. This allows for better risk management practices as banks have access to up-to-date information about their liquidity position at all times. By enabling all stakeholders to view transactional details in real-time without compromising sensitive information security standards. In addition to these benefits for streamlining operations, using blockchain technology for LCR management could also improve regulatory compliance efforts through improved transparency into financial records.

4) Decentralization and trust : As a result of blockchain's decentralized nature, intermediaries are eliminated in LCR management, reducing costs and increasing trust among participants. As a result of the consensus mechanism used in blockchain, all participants agree on the validity of transactions, enhancing trust and removing the need for trust-based relationships. The decentralized nature of blockchain means that there is no single point of failure or control. This makes the system more resilient against cyber threats or other forms of malicious attacks.

Interesting right?

LCR Management is a crucial aspect of financial institutions that helps them maintain their liquidity and meet regulatory requirements. However, traditional methods of managing LCR can be time-consuming and prone to errors. Blockchain technology offers a streamlined solution to LCR Management by providing real-time transparency, security, and efficiency.

By leveraging blockchain for LCR Management, financial institutions can save time and costs while ensuring compliance with regulations. As more financial companies adopt blockchain technology for their operations, we can expect to see further advancements in the management of liquidity coverage ratios. With its potential benefits becoming increasingly evident, now is the time for companies to explore how they can implement blockchain into their processes for better management of their liquid assets.

But why should you care ?

The importance of effective LCR management becomes even more evident when we look at the crisis that hit Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). The crisis occurred due to a run by uninsured depositors and insufficient bank liquidity regulation. SVB was not subject to the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), a rule that requires banks to hold sufficient high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to manage expected net cash outflows in a 30-day stress scenario. If SVB had been subject to the LCR, it would have needed to maintain more high-quality liquid assets and publicize more data about its liquidity risks. The LCR would have allowed both bank supervisors and the market to better understand and manage these risks.

In such a scenario, blockchain technology could have offered significant advantages.

Blockchain technology could have helped streamline LCR Management by providing a secure and transparent way to store, track, and manage financial data. For instance, if the LCR was managed on a blockchain, as in the SVB case, the bank would have been required to publicize more data about its liquidity risks in real-time. This increased transparency could have enabled better risk assessments by both the bank's supervisors and the market.

Through smart contracts, blockchain technology can automate many of the processes involved in LCR Management. These self-executing contracts are programmed with predefined rules that enable automatic execution of transactions when certain conditions are met. In the case of SVB, smart contracts on a blockchain could potentially have automated some aspects of regulatory compliance, including the LCR. These contracts could be programmed to enforce the rules of the LCR, triggering alerts or actions if the bank's liquidity coverage falls below the required threshold.

If you want to know more about the role that LCR or a lack of it had in the SVB crises I found the below mentioned links to be quite informative.

Next, I'll talk about how companies are using blockchain to bridge the long standing credit gap in developing economies in a frictionless and safe manner while putting liquidity to good use.

#Blockchain #tokenization #financialmarkets