The Blame Game
Leaders who blame others for any kind of failure turn teams and high performers into a talent revolving door. I call it "the talent double whammy": the best leave first, while the deadwood panderers stay forever. Blame breeds mistrust, and trust is at the core of outstanding leadership. Blamers cover up, deflect, evade, and generally suck as leaders. The psychology of blame in leadership is well-studied, particularly in organizational psychology and behavioral science. Leaders often resort to blame for self-preservation, managing their reputations, and maintaining authority; however, this practice has significant consequences for team dynamics and long-term organizational health.
The Psychology of Blame in Leadership
1. Blame as a Defense Mechanism
Leaders under pressure often blame external factors (predecessors, employees, market conditions) to protect their self-image and credibility. This aligns with self-serving bias, where individuals attribute successes to their abilities and failures to external circumstances (Miller & Ross, 1975).
2. Blame and Accountability Avoidance
Blame-shifting allows leaders to avoid taking responsibility, reducing cognitive dissonancea€, the psychological discomfort of holding conflicting beliefs about their competence (Festinger, 1957). However, organizations with blame cultures tend to experience lower trust, morale, and innovation (Edmondson, 1999).
领英推荐
3. Blame and Power Dynamics
Leaders in high-power positions may engage in strategic scapegoating, using subordinates as blame targets to reinforce authority and deflect criticism (Kramer, 1994). This can create a toxic culture where employees fear speaking up, leading to a decline in psychological safety.
4. Blame and Group Behavior
When leaders externalize blame, teams often mimic this behavior, creating a culture where employees avoid risk, accountability, and collaboration (Dweck, 2006). Conversely, leaders who model responsibility foster adaptive learning cultures, where teams focus on problem-solving rather than punishment (Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2013).
5. Blame vs. Learning Organizations
Amy Edmondson's research on psychological safety shows that high-performing teams embrace mistakes as learning opportunities rather than assigning blame. Organizations that shift from blame-based to learning-based cultures foster higher employee engagement, resilience, and long-term success.
independent designer at s j z design
3 周excellent writing. thank you again for great leadership counsel.
Public Safety Professional
3 周Steve, another fantastic reminder for leadership minded people at any level, of any organization be it private sector of government.
Principal National Security Sector at MITRE (Retired Gone Surfing)
3 周Having spent time at sea I prefer the following, Leadership Qualities of a Captain: Captains must possess the ability to put their egos aside and follow protocol. They must have a clear mind and be ready to take charge when necessary. This level of responsibility is not meant for everyone. Leaders take responsibility they don’t assign blame.
Veteran | Attorney | Director | Leader of People, Projects, Programs
3 周I often see those with a military background more able to stand up and say "I own this" even when people are injured or killed. I've seen countless examples of blame games in business settings where reputations may be sullied, but no one's life is in danger. This blame game can be one of the most toxic traits of an organization.
Co-Founder and Principal Consultant - PhD Leadership Partners | EdD, Mentoring, Teaching, Coaching & Speaking
3 周Well stated, a road best avoided...