The biggest misconception in learning the mathematical foundations of data science which no one tells you is ..
I will continue to share about my book - mathematical foundations of data science.
The biggest misconception in learning the mathematics of data science is: statistical inference is not the same as machine learning inference.?
This requires some explanation, but if you understand this concept, you are a long way ahead in understanding the mathematical foundations of data science than most people.?
Statisticians use the term ‘inference’ to mean making predictions about a population based on a sample.? In machine learning, we refer to the term ‘inference’ as the ability of an algorithm to generalise from the training data to new instances of data.?
This has implications which I shall explain below:
Once you understand the above, we can see how these two approaches are actually used in different contexts
Statistical Inference is used in fields where understanding the cause-effect relationship or testing theories is crucial. Examples include medical research, social sciences, and economics. Its also used where model interpretability is critical.
In contrasts, machine learning inference approaches are used when you value the predictability on new data - without necessarily understanding the underlying structure of the data or the interpretability of the model.? Because of the need to understand the underlying structure, machine learning and deep learning models are more complex relative to statistical models.?
领英推荐
Finally, to add to the fun and confusion, some models like regression are used both in a statistical sense and a machine learning sense - which is why when you use linear regression for machine learning, you still need to understand the underlying assumptions of regression . ?
I will expand on this in future posts
If you found this useful, you can sign up for my book https://forms.gle/g4Y41BncN56oCsoX8 ?
If you are a non developer and want to learn AI with me, please see Erdos Research Labs ?
You can meet me and our team at our Oxford AI summit ?
If you would like to study with me, see our courses
Management ?? | Technical Leader ???? | Marathonist ??♀?
8 个月Thanks for this post, this triggered me something that I've read in the book "love and math" from Edward Frenkel , where he point out that it's important to understand that if we don't understand the foundation of a certain subject we put our trust in the words and knowledge of someone or something else, hence we can put in danger human knowledge and criticism.
Founder/CEO at The Xavier Group, Ltd. -- Strategy Consultant; Futurist; Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Scientist
8 个月SPOT ON. Yes. Too many create more problems by only possessing broad overview knowledge of language definitions. Thus, it is a growing commonality to confuse mathematically sound statistics with mathematically sound machine learning and misrepresent by lack of understanding the two of them (and worse, to a broader issue) as well as the internal processes and systems for which they are to be used. THEY ARE NOT the SAME. They really are not similar.
Next Trend Realty LLC./wwwHar.com/Chester-Swanson/agent_cbswan
8 个月Thanks for Sharing.