The Biggest 401(k) Rollover Mistake

The Biggest 401(k) Rollover Mistake

Readers of these columns know that for years I held off rolling over my old 401(k) balances.

Oh, I had rational reasons for (not) doing so; the institutional pricing of a particular fund in one, the low fees in another, the managed account option in a third—but the reality was that the process of rolling over your accumulated savings has been—and in many cases remains—painful.

Rollovers are a big deal. Vanguard reports that annual contributions to IRAs ($701 billion as of 2020) far exceed all DC plan contributions, largely due to rollovers ($618 billion in 2020), while the Investment Company Institute claims that investors now hold an estimated $13.5 trillion in IRAs—“approximately $3 trillion more than in DC plans, despite the fact that 45 million fewer Americans own IRAs than participate in DC plans,” according to the report

Two things, in particular, stayed my hand over the years—trying to time the liquidation of funds (I know, but I’m human), and worrying about the timing I’d be out of the market while a hardcopy check found its way to me through the United States Postal Service. As it turned out—and much to my disappointment—both remained relevant issues as I consolidated my retirement savings.

One issue I didn’t face was one recently highlighted in a Wall Street Journal article, based on a new report by Vanguard. The headline of the former was “The 401(k) Rollover Mistake That Costs Retirement Savers Billions”—that mistake? Leaving those rollover balances in cash.

The Vanguard analysis notes that 28% of rollover investors[i] stayed in cash for at least 12 months, with minimal changes after the first three months following the contribution. More than that, the report notes that among rollovers conducted in 2015, 28% remained in cash for at least seven years[ii]—and explains that younger investors, women, and those with smaller balances are especially prone to staying in cash for years following a rollover.

Now, 28% is hardly a majority—and it pales in comparison to the number of individuals who contribute directly to an IRA who leave those balances sitting in cash. Still, the WSJ manages to find a situation where a couple who rolled over $400,000 into an IRA, and then “couldn’t figure out why they weren’t earning any money when the stock market was showing high returns.”

What seems a more common occurrence was another individual who had her $3,200 account automatically cashed out to an IRA—she was apparently unaware of the account until she got a statement from the IRA—and was dismayed to discover it was “not even in a highyield money-market fund.”

Vanguard’s analysis is leading it to recommend a QDIA for IRAs (a cynic might wonder if the latter is leading to the former). The paper claims that such a sanctioned device would—for investors under age 55, anyway—relative to staying in cash—provide, on average, an increase of at least $130,000 in retirement wealth at age 65—$172 billion in long-term benefits to all rollover investors in retirement each year.

Let’s face it—while target-date funds were long gaining traction as a 401(k) investment, they really took off after the Pension Protection Act of 2006 provided structure and a safe harbor for their implementation as a default investment. Similarly, the Vanguard recommendation notes that “implementing an IRA QDIA today may involve offering IRA providers safe-harbor relief from fiduciary liability and permitting transactions that are at risk of being deemed ‘self-dealing’ and thus prohibited. Accordingly, it would be important to ensure that appropriate oversight and protections are in place to prevent investors from being exposed to high-cost default investment products.”?

Indeed.?

Because if there’s anything worse than the mistake of not investing your rollover—it’s not rolling it over in the first place.

?


[i] On the other hand, Vanguard comments that twice as many—55%—of direct contribution investors left those monies in cash.

[ii] Across all rollovers, the median time between rollover and investing was actually nine months, with 28% of rollovers that transferred in cash remaining uninvested for at least seven years.

Troy L. Redstone, CPFA? AIF? CBFA? CFEI?

401(k) Architect, Keynote Speaker, Author, Repurposement Consultant, ERISA Geek, Fee-Only 401(k) Advisor, Financial Wellness Consultant

7 个月

Wow! Cash!?!?! So they had enough initiative to rollover out of their employer’s plan but not enough to re-invest the money. A professional retirement plan advisor could have (should have) helped them (and saved them money over retail fees in the IRA and higher advisor fees. This supports the case for not rolling over.

回复
Mike Webb

Senior Manager at CAPTRUST

7 个月

Cash? Seriously?

James Watkins, III JD, CFP Board Emeritus?, AWMA?

CEO/Managing Member at InvestSense, LLC, Fiduciary Risk management counsel

7 个月

Further illustrates need for an education requirement for plan participants!

Gina Alsdorf J.D., LL.M.

ERISA & Financial Services - Making ERISA More Fun since 2001!

7 个月

This is why glidepath QDIAs make so much more sense...

Tristan Smith

Chief Ambassador and Solution Specialist

7 个月

Nevin Adams great timing. I see this all the time. I love that you point out that 28% remain in cash for at least 7 years…just imagine the difference of $50k invested in an index fund between 8/9/17 and 8/19/25? Wow!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Nevin Adams的更多文章

  • (Back to) The Way We Were?

    (Back to) The Way We Were?

    It’s hard to believe that it’s now been five years ago that many of us went into our places of work, packed up, and…

    8 条评论
  • "Springing" Forward?

    "Springing" Forward?

    This past weekend most of America underwent a rather painful change — though it’s probably only just setting in. I’m…

    5 条评论
  • Less Than You’d Think

    Less Than You’d Think

    “Larry Fink Knows Less About Retirement Than You’d Think an Investment Billionaire Would.” That’s the provocative title…

    1 条评论
  • ‘Mad Money’s’ Mixed Bag

    ‘Mad Money’s’ Mixed Bag

    Last week a reader brought to my attention an episode of Jim Cramer’s “Mad Money” — an episode wherein he referred to…

    6 条评论
  • The "Find" Print

    The "Find" Print

    In case you hadn’t noticed, today (February 14) is Valentine's Day — and, as usual, there’s been the typical seasonal…

    16 条评论
  • Could Super Bowl 59 Influence Your 401(k)’s Future?

    Could Super Bowl 59 Influence Your 401(k)’s Future?

    Will your 401(k) be chopped by the Chiefs — or soar with the Eagles? That’s what adherents of the so-called Super Bowl…

    3 条评论
  • A Red Flag for a ‘Red Flag’ Report

    A Red Flag for a ‘Red Flag’ Report

    Did you hear the one about how nearly all U.S.

    21 条评论
  • Missing the Mark

    Missing the Mark

    A recent survey posed an intriguing question: Why are employees not participating in their 401(k)s? The answer(s) were…

    28 条评论
  • The Limits of Behavioral Finance?

    The Limits of Behavioral Finance?

    It’s long been noted that inertia is a powerful force regarding behavioral finance and automatic enrollment — but it…

    25 条评论
  • Encouraging Words

    Encouraging Words

    On what turned out to be the longest day of 2024, I said good-bye to my dear 94-year-old mother. It wasn’t how any of…

    42 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了