The Big Tech Backslide Even Darwin Would Disapprove Of
Who would have predicted that in 2023, with the AI revolution afoot, the leading names in tech would be regressing to archaic management styles they themselves eschewed merely a decade ago?
Take Salesforce as an example. According to a recent Bloomberg article, Salesforce’s celebrated employee-friendly culture and family-like values are no more. The company has chosen to adopt a more Darwinian approach. Its employees are now expected to perform at a much higher level—or risk being fired. Rating-and-rankings are back. Brace yourself, warns the article: the era of cushy tech jobs is over, and it's not just Salesforce; giants like Google, Meta, and Microsoft are tightening their belts and wielding the axe.
This abrupt shift reveals something quite stunning about our management thinking. We seem to be oscillating between two extremes: the Industrial Age doctrine of pressuring and holding employees accountable for performance, and the Humanist philosophy advocating trust, employee well-being, and autonomy and expecting performance in return.
The problem, as I’ve shared before, is that neither of these management philosophies fosters sustained high performance, especially during disruptive times. The Industrial Age model, while yielding short-term results, eventually leads to disengagement and burnout. Conversely, the Humanist approach, with its propensity to coddle employees with comforts, fosters complacency and entitlement, as exemplified in many tech giants.
领英推荐
What we seem to be blind to is an entirely different paradigm, a culture where people continuously raise the performance bar for themselves—because they genuinely want to, driven by their own will and conviction, not because they are pressured, rewarded, or coddled. This blindness keeps many companies, especially in the tech industry, trapped in a state of arrested development as they swing back and forth between the “nice guys” and “capitalist ogres”.
Think of a leader you admire (Satya Nadella, for instance). Why do they get up every morning and challenge themselves to perform at their absolute best, and then push themselves even beyond that? Their drive extends beyond ego or salary; it's fueled by a profound sense of responsibility and caring for the success of the business, its people, and the difference it makes in the lives of its beneficiaries. (I draw this insight from my 5-year tenure at Microsoft, observing Nadella's leadership firsthand.)
Now, envision every organization member embodying this level of responsibility, accountability, and caring every day. What would it take to awaken this kind of intrinsic, purposeful drive in them? How would it impact their performance and commitment to raising their own performance bar? Would they still need external nudges or coddling?
The answer appears self-evident. This insight holds great significance for companies like Salesforce and many others:
Implement these changes and you won’t need to coerce, manipulate, or coddle your employees ever again; their performance will rise naturally, and they will thank you for it.
Account manager at Bitrix24 Israel at AgileConsult
1 年Thank you, Max. Your article prompted me to think about how to become a true leader and raise other leaders, for example from employees, and even my children. Using the example of my children, I see how the carrot and stick method, a strict parent and a soft parent, works. Now I understand that a lot depends on what stage of understanding the student is at. By the way, while studying neural networks, I see that this approach is also applicable there. And so: at the beginning of the path, the student simply needs a strict framework from a system of balanced carrots and sticks, and as he progresses, the effectiveness of the approach you are talking about becomes more and more effective. And as a result, an advanced leader is already on the fast track of responsibility, caring, and imperturbability. However, a person who is just taking the first steps in his career may become confused and stuck without strict boundaries.
EM at Meta - AI/ML Infra (Hiring Eng and EMs!)
1 年This is also called Max Optimism.
Leadership & Executive Coaching ???? 2x LinkedIn Top Voice for Conscious-Leaning Change Makers and Leadership Teams
1 年Well said, Max Shkud. Leaders and their cultures oscillate like a ping pong causing cynicism among their employees. I've seen the same thing with org structures - centralized then decentralized and back again. Thanks for showing a Third Way - so people grow on behalf of their contribution they're aiming to make at work and in the world.
Community Health & Well-Being | Medical Education| Cross-Functional Collaborator I Regenerative Development| Global Health
1 年Max Shkud, I wholeheartedly embrace your approach to cultivating a CEO-like mindset at every leadership level. Possibly, my comment below might seem out of place since I'm not a management consultant. While Darwin's theory of evolution is often associated with competition and survival, it also offers insight into cooperation in the natural world. Darwin himself observed cooperative behavior in nature, and his theory offers explanations for how cooperation, mutualistic relationships, and altruism serve as strategies for life to evolve. Everyday life is much more intricate than the "nice guys" versus "capitalist ogres" dynamic we are witnessing in the business world!
HR Leadership | Talent Development | Organization Design
1 年Great situation analysis! One thing both of these extremes share is paternalism. Under the hood of paternalism is a simplistic use of power and a fatal bias that leaders are “in charge” of a complex system (i.e. “their” company). Possessive words like “my people” are cues to this flawed thinking.