Big data Spark vs Flink
Santhosh Parampottupadam
Research Scientist | We're Hiring | German Cancer Research Center |Generative AI | PPML??| Federated Learning
at do they have in common? Flink and Spark are both general-purpose data processing platforms and top level projects of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). They have a wide field of application and are usable for dozens of big data scenarios. Thanks to expansions like SQL queries (Spark: Spark SQL, Flink: MRQL), Graph processing (Spark: GraphX, Flink: Spargel (base) and Gelly(library)), machine learning (Spark: MLlib, Flink: Flink ML) and stream processing (Spark Streaming, Flink Streaming). Both are capable of running in standalone mode, yet many are using them on top of Hadoop (YARN, HDFS). They share a strong performance due to their in memory nature.
However, the way they achieve this variety and the cases they are specialized on differ.
Differences:
In contrast to Flink, Spark is not capable of handling data sets larger than the RAM before version 1.5.x
Flink is optimized for cyclic or iterative processes by using iterative transformations on collections. This is achieved by an optimization of join algorithms, operator chaining and reusing of partitioning and sorting. However, Flink is also a strong tool for batch processing. Flink streaming processes data streams as true streams, i.e., data elements are immediately "pipelined" though a streaming program as soon as they arrive. This allows to perform flexible window operations on streams.
Spark on the other hand is based on resilient distributed datasets (RDDs). This (mostly) in-memory datastructure gives the power to sparks functional programming paradigm. It is capable of big batch calculations by pinning memory. Spark streaming wraps data streams into mini-batches, i.e., it collects all data that arrives within a certain period of time and runs a regular batch program on the collected data. While the batch program is running, the data for the next mini-batch is collected.
Will Flink replace Hadoop?
No, it will not. Hadoop consists of different parts:
- HDFS - Hadoop Distributed Filesystem
- YARN - Yet Another Resource Negotiator (or Resource Manager)
- MapReduce - The batch processing Framework of Hadoop
HDFS and YARN are still necessary as integral part of BigData clusters. Those two are building the base for other distributed technologies like distributed query engines or distributed databases. The main use-case for MapReduce is batch processing for data sets larger than the RAM of the cluster while Flink is designed for iterative processing. So in general those two can co-exist.
Cloud Data Architect/Engineer DataOps | MLOps | AWS | GCP | Azure | Snowflake | DBT | Airflow | Big Data | Hadoop/Spark| Python
9 年I second Vishnu..
Founder @ Jarvislabs.ai
9 年Spark is not capable of handling data sets larger than the RAM before version 1.5.x : Why do u say this. I don't agree to it.