Biden Proposes Nationwide Rent Control

Biden Proposes Nationwide Rent Control


He wants to cap rent increases at 5% a year, if you can believe it.

July 16, 2024 at 5:35 pm


We hoped President Biden had merely misspoken during last week’s NATO press conference when he mentioned capping rents. Alas, no. On Tuesday he unveiled a nationwide rent-control plan, another classic White House policy contradiction: Subsidize housing, then discourage its development.

Higher mortgage rates and home prices are pushing Americans out of the home-buying market. This is contributing to higher demand for rental housing. Rents on average nationwide have risen 30% over the last four years and even more in Sun Belt states with fast-growing populations. Evictions are also increasing in many markets.

Enter Mr. Biden, who on Tuesday pitched conditioning “valuable federal tax breaks” on landlords capping rent increases at 5% annually. The White House says its plan would apply to “corporate” landlords with more than 50 units, covering more than 20 million units or roughly half the country’s rental stock.

What are such lucrative tax breaks? The press release refers to “faster depreciation write-offs.” Under the current tax code, residential rental property owners can depreciate a building’s value over 27.5 years, rather than 39 as for other types of commercial real estate. A shorter depreciation schedule increases the incentive to invest in rental housing.

Conditioning this tax benefit on landlords limiting rents to 5% would do the opposite. It would reduce and could even eliminate the return on rental housing investments, especially since inflation has driven up insurance, construction and maintenance costs. Investors will have to pay higher taxes or accept a lower return. The Administration wants to increase subsidies for affordable housing even as it promotes policies to make such projects less financially attractive.

The White House says its rent-control ultimatum won’t discourage new housing investment because it would apply only to existing units. But developers will rightly anticipate that the policy will eventually be extended to newer units, which will factor into their investment calculus. Reducing the return on completed projects also reduces the capital available to invest in new ones.

This is also what the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) did in March when it capped annual rent increases at 10% for rental units that benefit from the low-income housing tax credit. The ceiling was previously set at twice the annual increase in the median household income, which would have been 14.8% this year.

Tax depreciation schedules are set by statute, so Congress would have to enact Mr. Biden’s new national rent-control plan. But the expiration of the Trump tax cuts at the end of 2025 will provide him with negotiating leverage if he is re-elected with Republican control of one or both chambers of Congress. There is also bipartisan support in Congress for increasing housing tax subsidies.

It’s hard to think of a worse idea than imposing rent control nationwide through the tax code. It would reduce investment in new supply and drive up rents in units not subject to government caps. Look at New York City where nearly half of units are “rent stabilized,” and the average one-bedroom apartment costs $4,300 a month.

As Mr. Biden’s re-election prospects grow more dire, his policy lurches to the left are becoming ever more radical.

I think the conversation is beyond "right" or "left." It is time to move the conversation to Truth. What looks better off to one person, certainly can be unappealing to another. For example, if you are not invested in the stock market or don't even know what it is, than the last four years look pretty dismal. In fact, the last 10 years look challenging. But if you have invested in the stock market over the last four to 10 years, your wealth has expanded. Unfortunately, people with little to no wealth bears the burden of the untruth and therefore vote against themselves. Worse, the lies become their truth and yes they remain worse off four years prior over and over again.

回复

No idea is too inane, insane or idiotic for this man to suggest. The depth he is willing to go in pandering to the lunatic fringe could not be measured by the deepest well boring or the lowest diving submarine. We must pull America back from the abyss that this man has dragged us to. Ronald Reagan asked a question that was pertinent 44 years ago and it still is: “are you better off now than you were four years ago?“

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了