The bias towards AVAILABILITY

The bias towards AVAILABILITY

You have to hand it to Ehrenberg-Bass.

They’ve now managed to get a large proportion of the marketing community talking about mental and physical availability.

Pretty impressive to have rebranded both salience and distribution.

But it’s worth remembering we are talking about a heuristic here. A behavioural economics magic trick.?

Availability is one of nearly two hundred cognitive biases. That beautiful chart by John Manoogian III puts it in the ‘too much information’ sector, where we notice things already primed in our memory or repeated often.

It sits alongside the illusory truth effect, the mood-congruent memory bias, the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon, the base rate fallacy and the empathy gap. And yes, I’ve checked, all five of those are in the same camp.

But availability’s the one that’s won through with brands.

I wonder why.

It’s easy to see the appeal of physical availability because it’s about making your brand easy to buy. A vending machine in a train station on a hot summer’s day.

And mental availability? That’s also about ease, the likelihood of a brand coming easily to mind in buying situations - the when, where, with whom, with what and why of decision-making.

So the theory is you need to build up and continually refresh a network of associations in people’s minds linked to your brand.

And you also need a number of distinctive brand assets to trigger these associations. Oh look, a red sign, I fancy a Coke on the way home.

Like all biases availability is a mental short-cut. It works on the basis that if something can be recalled, it must be important - or at least more important than alternative solutions that aren’t as readily recalled.

It’s also a sleight of hand. You can observe the trick happening but you don’t always know how it’s done, except that creativity was somehow involved.

One consequence of this is convincing yourself the only thing that matters is being distinctive, standing out, the easy-to-measure bit.

But I think most of us have now re-realised that differentiation matters to brands too.

And creating meaningful differentiation is hard.

You need to look at your target and their surface and deeper needs. The surface needs are key at a category level but brand choices are, at least in part - and I would say large part - driven by deeper needs.?

Then you need to consider your product’s features, its functional and emotional benefits, personality, origins, values, purpose. Everything.?

You have to put all this in a competitive context. Where does everyone else sit? Where could you sit? Where should you?

You even need to understand the world you’re in. More people are now arguing that culture makes brands. I’m not sure about that. Not long ago those same people were arguing brands made culture.

Then you decide what you stand for. You make a choice. And even if your tactics are then dynamic and fluid, you stay true to your essence. Otherwise you’ll be like a ship in a storm.

Of course, the killer argument for availability will always be how busy we are and how little we think about brands. Both true.

But saying it’s all about being easy to mind and easy to find, sorry, that’s too easy.

Julia Kinner

Growth Strategy & Execution for B2C Challenger Brands | We Help Our Clients to Achieve Exponential Growth | Accepting Growth Consulting Engagements

1 年

Great post Richard. Unfortunately there is a tendency to search for the golden bullet that solves all problems. But it takes a comprehensive view on consumers, the market and the business.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Richard Brown的更多文章

  • Ladder UP, ladder DOWN

    Ladder UP, ladder DOWN

    You have to be careful on a benefits ladder. Everyone knows what to do.

    2 条评论
  • THAT's how you do it

    THAT's how you do it

    You don’t often find Billy Joel and AC/DC in the same sentence. But there’s a concert of Joel’s at Madison Square…

  • All in the MIND

    All in the MIND

    It used to be enough to say brands had to stay ‘top of mind’. And positioning was described over forty years ago as ‘a…

    9 条评论
  • Twenty DO's and DON'Ts

    Twenty DO's and DON'Ts

    Closer to Brands turns twenty on February 1st. Two decades down of brand consultancy and qualitative research.

  • Another box of MEMORIES

    Another box of MEMORIES

    So the Christmas decorations are down and put away. Our odd collection of baubles, lights and ornaments acquired over…

  • Follow your own STAR

    Follow your own STAR

    Any chance in 2025 we can end some of marketing’s ongoing debates? Like Distinctiveness vs. Differentiation.

  • Insight OUT

    Insight OUT

    Up and down we go like a yoyo. From the top to the bottom of the Need Map and back again.

  • Together ALONE

    Together ALONE

    The horizontal axis on a Need Map is running through everything at the moment. That’s the one that goes from assertive…

  • DEEPER NEEDS MAKE STRONGER BRANDS

    DEEPER NEEDS MAKE STRONGER BRANDS

    A brand has to stand for something. Has to.

  • DRUNK on insight

    DRUNK on insight

    One question in marketing has always interested me the most. What do we want? You.

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了