Bias for Action vs. Bias for Process: How Over-Processing Kills Innovation
Johnny Austin
VP of Engineering | AI Automation | Payments | M&A | Global Team Leadership | Organizational Culture | Operational Excellence | Podcast Host
We've all heard about and even proclaimed the benefits of having a bias for action (particularly in high-growth environments). Conversely, you can discuss why not having a bias for action can impede progress. But there's a third mode—a more insidious one that also affects organizations. It's what I call a bias for process. What makes a bias for process so dangerous is that it can look like bias for action to the uninitiated. Here's how it might be rotting away your organization's innovative core.
Understanding Bias for Action vs. Bias for Process
A bias for action describes a culture where the default next step is to make impactful progress or, metaphorically, "move the ball down the field." The key here is that you are measurably closer to completing the goal, whatever it may be, by taking the next steps. A bias for process looks like a bias for action, but it isn't. To extend our analogy further, instead of "moving the ball down the field," we "pick up the ball and set it back down in the same spot." In practice, those "next steps" create the illusion of productivity but do little more than keep people busy.
Common Signs of Process Bias
Here are some examples of bias for process next steps:
The Hidden Costs of Process Bias
There are good reasons to do any of the above things occasionally—they're tools. The question is, are these your culture's default actions? If so, you might have a bias for process. These behaviors (however well-intentioned) often become habitual, overshadowing the necessity for decisive action. Teams can find themselves locked into cycles of discussions and consultative meetings, which, while designed to foster collaboration (or sometimes consensus), inadvertently lead to decision paralysis.
The danger lies in normalizing these behaviors to the extent that any meaningful progress is stymied. Employees may start to feel disillusioned, sensing that their time and talents are not being fully leveraged toward tangible outcomes. Instead of innovation and agility, what emerges is a rigid adherence to bureaucracy that stifles creativity and responsiveness.
领英推荐
Breaking Free from Process Paralysis
To combat a bias for process, organizations should consider implementing these strategies:
The Path Forward
It's imperative for organizations to consciously cultivate a bias for action rather than succumb to the pitfalls of a bias for process. By effectively identifying and addressing tendencies towards a bias for process, companies can unlock their full potential, ensuring that time is spent on meaningful work that advances strategic and customer goals.
Remember: Process should serve progress, not hinder it. By emphasizing outcomes and accountability while empowering teams, organizations can not only energize employees but also reinvigorate their innovative spirit, ultimately leading to sustained success and growth.
Have you worked at organizations that have a bias for process? Share your experiences and thoughts in the comments below. ??
If you've made it this far, you might be interested in more intimate updates from me, such as personal developments and specific things I'm working on or more niche topics I'm considering. If that sounds cool, subscribe here. No more than four updates a year ????