Beyond the OR: The Ripple Effect of Precision Spine Surgery

Beyond the OR: The Ripple Effect of Precision Spine Surgery

Welcome to the latest edition of Surgisync!

In this issue, we delve into the transformative impact of precision spine surgery and the advancements in technology that are revolutionizing healthcare. From enhanced accuracy and safety during procedures to significant cost savings and improved patient outcomes, discover how computer-assisted navigation and minimally invasive techniques are reshaping the landscape of spine surgery. Join us as we explore the ripple effect of these innovations beyond the operating room, benefiting surgeons, hospitals, and patients alike.

The Era of Technology

Precision spine surgeries have a profound impact on the operating room, influencing nearly all aspects of healthcare and society. With technology advancing rapidly, adopting these innovations can significantly transform healthcare delivery. These advancements are helping surgeons develop new, safer surgical techniques. Over the years, new operative techniques have been developed and adapted in spine surgeries, evident in imaging and implants.

One such breakthrough is computer-assisted navigation, commonly known as navigation. This technology emerged to address the challenges associated with errors in the placement of pedicle screws, which can lead to inaccuracies, damages, increased surgical effort, and complications due to vertebral body variations. Spine navigation can be utilized at all spinal levels, including cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral. Moreover, the advent of spine robotics has introduced significant potential to revolutionize the field. Spine navigation's positive impact is evident in its ability to transform spine surgery by enhancing outcomes and efficiency for procedures, patients, hospitals, and surgeons alike.

Efficiency and Safety During Procedures

The adoption of navigation in spine surgeries is largely due to its ability to improve screw placement accuracy. This claim is supported by studies, such as the one by Luther et al., which found that 88% of navigated pedicle screws had no breaches, compared to 82% of cases using lateral fluoroscopy (P<0.001). This demonstrates the superior accuracy of navigation. Additionally, Luther’s research showed that screws placed with navigation were significantly larger, had a significantly larger screw/pedicle diameter ratio, and required significantly fewer revision procedures.

Another study by Ioannis et al. involving 1,105 patients and 6,617 screws compared different techniques: free-hand, fluoroscopy, CT navigation-based, and fluoroscopy-based navigation. The results showed that the percentage of screws fully contained in the pedicle ranged from:

  • Free-Hand: 69-94%
  • Fluoroscopy: 28-85%
  • CT Navigation: 89-100%
  • Fluoroscopy-Based Navigation: 81-92%

Free-hand technique screws tended to perforate the cortex medially, whereas those placed with CT navigation guidance more often perforated laterally. According to Benjamin et al., in a study involving 8,539 screws (4,814 navigated and 3,725 non-navigated), the relative risk of pedicle screw perforation risk was:

- Navigated: 6%

- Conventional: 15%

These statistics are not just numbers but clear indicators of how navigation impacts surgeon confidence during procedures. Pre-operative surgical and screw planning, intra-operative guidance, and comprehensive surgical views (axial, sagittal, coronal) collectively make a significant difference. The rise of minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) has reduced muscle and tissue damage, aiding faster recovery. Thus, navigation and MIS can be considered dynamic duos. For a deeper understanding of navigation in MIS, refer to the related articles already available.

Mastering Spine Navigation: Empowering Surgeons and Hospitals

The impact of spine navigation extends beyond pre-operative and surgical procedures. Numerous studies and research indicate that spine navigation helps reduce reoperations, which are more frequent with free-hand techniques. In some cases, the cost of revisions can outweigh the cost of the navigation system itself. For example, Robert et al. conducted a study on 100 patients using image-guided navigation and 100 prior uses without navigation. They found that the rate of revision surgeries decreased from 3% to 0% with image guidance (p=0.08). The study also noted that the average cost of a revision surgery for a misplaced pedicle screw was $23,762, and the use of the navigation system saved $71,286 in the first hundred cases.

Research indicates that the cost savings from reduced revision surgeries can be substantial. Here are some key points:

- Cost of Revision Surgeries: The average cost of a revision surgery due to a misplaced pedicle screw is approximately $23,762.

- Reduction in Revision Rates: By decreasing the revision surgery rate from 3% to 0% with image guidance, the use of navigation systems saved $71,286 in the first 100 cases.

- Overall Savings: A study by Hyun et al. indicated that hospitals could save up to $144,000 annually by reducing the need for revision surgeries through the adoption of navigation systems.

- Patient Benefits: For patients, the reduced need for additional surgeries means less out-of-pocket expenses, fewer days off work, and reduced overall healthcare costs. Studies have shown that patient costs can decrease by 20-30% due to fewer complications and shorter recovery times associated with precise navigation.

Research also shows that the time required for navigation-based surgery, free-hand technique, and fluoroscopy-based surgery is nearly the same for screw placement. However, the complexity of the surgery can affect the time taken for screw placement. Vaishnav et al. compared intra-operative navigation and fluoroscopy methods, concluding that intra-operative navigation does not increase time demands compared to fluoroscopy. It is feasible, safe, accurate, and results in lower radiation exposure. For more detailed information on this topic, refer to the articles already available.

Conclusion

The integration of computer-assisted navigation in spine surgeries has significantly enhanced both efficiency and safety. Studies demonstrate its superior accuracy in screw placement, reducing complications and the need for revision surgeries. Navigation systems enhance surgeon confidence through detailed pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance, and their synergy with minimally invasive techniques promotes faster recovery. Additionally, the cost savings and reduced radiation exposure associated with navigation systems make them economically advantageous. Overall, spine navigation represents a pivotal innovation, transforming precision spine surgery and promising better patient outcomes and surgical efficiency.

---

References

- Luther N, Iorgulescu JB, Geannette C, et al. Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws: screw accuracy, screw size, and the complexity of surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2015;28. 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828af33e

- Ioannis D. Gelalis, Nikolaos K. Paschos, Emilios E. Pakos, Angelos N. Politis, Christina M. Arnaoutoglou, Athanasios C. Karageorgos, Avraam Ploumis, Theodoros A. Xenakis. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free-hand, fluoroscopy guidance, and navigation techniques, 2012; 10.1007/s00586-011-2011-3

- Robert Green Watkins, Akash Gupta. Cost-Effectiveness of Image-Guided Spine Surgery, 2010; 10.2174/1874325001004010228

- Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity: a comparative study with open surgical methods. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015; 22(3): 332-338. 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14129

- Benjamin J Shin, Andrew R James, Innocent U Njoku, Roger H?rtl. Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion, 2012, 10.3171/2012.5.SPINE11399

Related Articles

- [Revolutionizing Spine Surgery: Minimizing]

(https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/revolutionizing-spine-surgery-minimizing-hieuc?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_series_entity%3BbljB9OfbQvKu%2BA%2BYyAI1WQ%3D%3D)

- [Minimally Invasive, Maximally Precise]

(https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/minimally-invasive-maximally-precise-ptsqc?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_series_entity%3BoyhWs6knQyG9YDTx%2FuKq9g%3D%3D)


Your front-row seat to updates - connect with us on

LinkedIn: https://in.linkedin.com/company/happy-reliable-surgeries-pvt-ltd-

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HRSNavigationSocial/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hrs_navigation/

Website: https://hrsnavigation.com/

Sunil Taneja

Driving Innovation in Medical Devices | Expert in Sales , Clinical Applications, & Technical Services

4 个月

Thought Provoking study

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了