Beyond Resistance: Cultivating Change Engagement

Beyond Resistance: Cultivating Change Engagement

Change engagement is a positive psychological state that employees experience when they are enthusiastic and willing to support, adopt, and promote organizational change. It is considered a more proactive and motivational expression of positive change-related attitudes than other constructs such as openness to change or readiness for change. When employees are appropriately engaged, organizations are more likely to see positive change outcomes, such as successful implementation and adoption of a change and return on change investment.

In a conceptual analysis by Albrecht et. al. (2020), the authors propose the Change Engagement Model (CEM), which is based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, to help explain the impact of change engagement. The CEM argues that change-related organizational resources, job resources, job demands, and personal resources can directly and indirectly influence change engagement. The key components of the CEM include:

The model proposes that change engagement, influenced by the other factors, leads to successful implementation and adoption of ongoing change, return on change investment, and innovation.

The CEM highlights the importance of organizations adopting a "systems" approach to organizational change, where organizational, job, and personal resources are measured, embedded, and developed. The model can be used to develop a common language around change and as a diagnostic tool for organizations to understand and manage employee attitudes toward change.

The CEM can be used to increase employee engagement by providing a framework for understanding and managing the various factors that influence how employees experience organizational change. The CEM identifies key areas where organizations can focus their efforts to promote positive attitudes and active participation in change initiatives.

Overall, the authors conclude that the CEM can be a valuable tool for both researchers and practitioners to better understand, manage, and optimize employee engagement. It offers a way to move away from managing resistance to change and towards creating a work environment that promotes active engagement.

The authors also note that more research is needed to validate the CEM and to further explore the relationship between change engagement and organizational outcomes. However, they believe that the model has the potential to be a valuable tool for organizations that are seeking to improve their change management practices. They propose that change engagement, as a motivational and agentic construct, is essential for organizations seeking employees who are not just passively accepting of change but are energized and actively involved in the process.

See my LinkedIn Profile

Follow me on LinkedIn

Subscribe to Metamorphosis

?

Sources:

Albrecht, S., Connaughton, S., Foster, K., Furlong, S. & Yeow, C. (2020), "Change Engagement, Change Resources, and Change Demands: A Model for Positive Employee Orientations to Organizational Change", Frontiers in Psychology, (11)531944.


Chris Whaley

I help organizations drive results while fostering engagement and collaboration. A speaker, coach, and facilitator with expertise in project management and HR. Founder of EscapeToExpand.com

4 天前

Love this Charles Haywood! Dealing with resistance (both positive and negative) is just a part of the engagement strategy. There are so many other levers to consider! I believe it starts with engaging stakeholders to get them to see that. early in the process.

回复
Jo McDermott

Expert Change Management Practitioner for Large Scale Business Transformations, PROSCI certified

2 周

Yes!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Charles Haywood的更多文章

  • More Accomplishment, Less Behavior

    More Accomplishment, Less Behavior

    We hear it uttered by change practitioners all the time: behavior must change before the organization will change. Most…

    8 条评论
  • Shaping Readiness

    Shaping Readiness

    Communication plays a crucial role in how employees react to organizational change. It can determine whether change…

  • The Change Measurement Paradox

    The Change Measurement Paradox

    Frequently talked about, though often poorly executed, measuring change success can be vexing for change agents. So why…

    1 条评论
  • "Lighten Up, Francis!"

    "Lighten Up, Francis!"

    “Change management is dead!” “Change management must change.” “Need to re-think change management.

    2 条评论
  • Exploring Change Capacity

    Exploring Change Capacity

    Change capacity, broadly defined as an organization’s ability to effectively initiate, manage, and sustain change, is…

    3 条评论
  • Is the Primacy of Individual Change Simply Folklore?

    Is the Primacy of Individual Change Simply Folklore?

    In “ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government and our Community” (2006), Jeffrey Hiatt suggests that successful…

    5 条评论
  • Change Sponsorship in Perspective

    Change Sponsorship in Perspective

    “?????????????????????? ???? ?????? #1 ?????? ?????????????????????? ???? ???????????? ??????????????.” This is…

    6 条评论
  • The Power of Intentional Influence

    The Power of Intentional Influence

    While it is generally acknowledged that stakeholder engagement differs from stakeholder management, some ambiguity…

    1 条评论
  • Readiness and Resistance: Coexisting Forces

    Readiness and Resistance: Coexisting Forces

    While past organizational change management literature viewed resistance and readiness as opposite poles on a…

    1 条评论
  • Integrating Planned & Emergent Change

    Integrating Planned & Emergent Change

    In much of the recent debate regarding planned and emergent change, it is presented as a dichotomy, an either/or…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了