Beyond Our First Principles: How AI Can Help Financial Advisors Challenge Their Biases

In the financial advisory world, we all develop what I call "first principles" – deeply ingrained biases that simplify our complex world but can ultimately limit our effectiveness. This is especially true for those of us in sales, where conviction often outweighs nuance. After all, it's easier to sell what you wholeheartedly believe in than to navigate the messy reality of tradeoffs and uncertainty.

Recently, I engaged in a fascinating exploration with AI about how to properly compare and allocate between dividend-paying stocks and permanent life insurance for estate planning in the Canadian context. The conversation revealed how challenging it is to overcome our professional biases and reminded me why we must constantly seek to challenge our own assumptions.

The Complexity Beyond Our Simplifications

Our discussion began with fundamental risk categorizations of dividend stocks and quickly evolved into the intricate mathematics of comparing guaranteed life insurance with equity investments. We explored several critical dimensions that advisors often oversimplify:

Risk-Adjusted Return Calculations

Traditional approaches like the Sharpe Ratio need substantial modification when comparing fundamentally different asset classes like stocks and insurance. The guaranteed elements of insurance require different statistical treatment than the variable returns of equities.

Tax Efficiency Nuances

While both dividend stocks and life insurance have tax advantages in Canada, the reality is far more complex than most presentations suggest:

• Policy loans in Canada aren't the tax-free access vehicles they're often portrayed to be
• The dividend tax credit creates advantages that aren't always properly factored into comparisons
• Third-party loans against policies offer creative alternatives with different tax implications

The Insurability Paradox

Perhaps most importantly, we uncovered what I now call the "insurability paradox": mathematical optimization suggests increasing insurance allocations with age, yet biological reality makes this progressively more difficult and expensive. This fundamental tension challenges simplistic allocation models.

From Bias to Evidence

What struck me most about this exploration was how easy it is to fall back on our professional biases – whether we're "insurance people" or "investment people." These biases aren't harmless; they directly impact the quality of advice we provide clients.

The traditional industry approach favors simple narratives:

• "Insurance provides guaranteed returns and tax-free benefits"
• "Dividend stocks offer growth, income, and liquidity"

But the mathematical reality requires more sophisticated thinking:

• Forward-looking allocation strategies that anticipate insurability constraints
• Probability-weighted modeling that accounts for mortality and market variables
• Layered implementation approaches that balance theoretical optimization with practical realities

AI as a Bias-Challenging Tool

This is where I believe AI offers tremendous value to financial professionals. Not as a replacement for human judgment, but as a tool to help us challenge our own biases and explore complex questions with greater mathematical sophistication.

When I approached this exploration, I deliberately sought to set aside my own professional biases (not easy!) to see what insights might emerge. The result was a much richer understanding of allocation strategies that:

1. Acknowledge both mathematical principles and practical constraints
2. Consider regulatory and professional responsibilities alongside optimization
3. Embrace the time-dependent nature of optimal allocations
4. Account for implementation challenges like declining insurability

Moving Beyond First Principles

For those of us committed to providing truly excellent financial advice, moving beyond our first principles requires:

• Acknowledging our own biases and tendency toward oversimplification
• Embracing mathematical complexity rather than avoiding it
• Being willing to recommend balanced approaches even when they create less professional certainty, acknowledging that all we truly have over the long term are assumptions and probabilities
• Continually seeking tools and perspectives that challenge our thinking

The financial professionals who will thrive in the AI era won't be those who cling most fiercely to their established biases. Rather, it will be those who use AI and other tools to constantly question, refine, and improve their understanding – even when it means acknowledging that the world is more complex than our simplifications suggest.

What "first principles" might be limiting your effectiveness as a financial advisor? And how might you use new tools to challenge them?

This is precisely what we're striving to accomplish with our Math.Logic.Wealth community. Our mission is to provide verifiable evidence to consumers so they can make truly informed decisions about any amount they choose to allocate to the life insurance financial instrument.

Our community's preferred approach is explaining the complex as simply as possible without sacrificing accuracy. We encourage everyone to take advantage of our automated Decision Process Analysis (DPA) – a mathematically enabled decision framework (currently under development) that allows consumers to make informed choices to optimize death benefits in today's proliferation of insurance products. By grounding recommendations in mathematical evidence rather than industry narratives, we believe we can elevate the quality of financial advice and client outcomes.

This article was developed through a collaborative exploration with AI, examining the mathematical and practical considerations of estate planning asset allocation. It represents an approach to professional development that embraces complexity and challenges professional biases.

#FinancialPlanning #AIinFinance #EstatePlanning #WealthManagement #LifeInsurance #DividendInvesting #FinancialAdvisors #CriticalThinking #MathLogicWealth #CanadianFinance