Beyond the Lab: Embracing Educational Transformation

As I step into the field of educational leadership, transitioning from a physical science background feels like venturing into uncharted waters. Yet, this journey excites me, as it draws me into the vast, dynamic sea of transformative change. As I strive to become an educational leader at the forefront of this new paradigm in New York State, I can already sense the waves of innovation reaching into my familiar territory, challenging and reshaping my perspectives. This journey affirms my purpose and equips me with invaluable insights on the evolving landscape of education as I navigate toward meaningful, systemic change.

“It has been a full generation since April 22, 1993, when Supercomputing Applications announced that the web browser was available to the public”, (Davidson, 2017, p.5). Since then, our education system has transitioned from the Industrial Age to the Technological Age where the focus has shifted from educating people for manual labor to empowering students with soft skills for successful communication and collaboration necessary to navigate a world in flux. The new paradigm demands a fundamental shift in how we teach and evaluate student progress, emphasizing meaningful learning over measuring time to completion. The implications of this learner-centered curriculum require a fundamental change in the way we teach, test, assess, and the role of teachers and students in the learning process. According to Kim (2014), our current education system does not need fixing because it is not broken; it is merely performing exactly as it has been designed to perform”.? These changes will not be effective and sustainable within the current structure of the factory model of schools. For truly transformative change, the whole education system needs an overhaul, must be spearheaded at the state level and requires a systemic approach. We need a paradigm shift in education that is both fundamental and comprehensive; uses a critical systems approach that seeks to transform the school system to learner-centered; and has the capability of assessing progress towards a well-defined set of shared goals.

How can we assist our faculties in navigating this new context, which Wheatley (1996) describes as “complex and organic”? First, as Bennis (2009) puts it, “…we must master that context if we are to solve our own problems, let alone societal ones, and to do that we must first examine it.” (p.7). A leader who masters the historical and contextual intelligence develops a well-grounded understanding of how the education system has changed over time, deeply examines the system’s environment and its complex interactions, and is able to develop a clear and coherent core purpose and a set of shared core values that aligns with all stakeholders in the education system. I see this as probably the most critical role of a leader since it sets the foundation for the work of re-imagining and rebuilding of the new education system.

Second, leaders must be able to engage in transformative dialogue that involves a mindset change. This is another truly challenging but important process as it develops a readiness capacity for cultural change among all stakeholders before any meaningful change can occur. I believe that no organizational transformation occurs without personal transformation; therefore, a leader must encourage stakeholders to examine their personal beliefs in order to develop a sense of shared meaning. Wheatley (1996) explores this notion by connecting it to the logic of life, “Life uses messes to get to well-ordered solutions” (p.13). The idea that true stakeholder engagement will not value neatness of thought or ideas, but will welcome redundancy, fuzziness, dense webs of relationships and trials and errors to establish what works.

Third, leaders should be able to develop a firm foundation of purpose and a set of core values that establishes the blueprint for designing a comprehensive change in the organization. To this end, a leader must be able to apply a systems thinking approach that engages all stakeholders to move from the purpose stage to developing a common vision and eventually to defining the strategies and specific activities toward a common goal. This may seem daunting at first, but leaders should be motivated by the fact that, as Wheatley (1996) puts it, “This world of a simpler way has a natural and spontaneous tendency toward organization. It seeks order” (p.6). Even though there will be chaos present at the beginning stages of a systems design process, this should signify a system of organization emanating from the different elements of the system attempting to combine. ?

Lastly, a leader must be able to endure revolution through persistent evolution. The idea that because true transformation takes time and massive amounts of resources, a leader must resist the temptation to take superficial shortcuts that produce quick visible results but not lasting changes. As Whyte (2001) puts it, “By dawn, I was starting out over the far sea, involved in a strange inversion of the stranger’s experience, for I felt as if I was new ground, and the vast sea was reaching into my contained territory; molding and shaping a future life” (p.22). This metaphor encapsulates my experience: the vast sea of educational change is not only reshaping the system but also transforming me as a leader, guiding me towards a future defined by purpose, innovation, and shared progress.

?

References

Bennis, W. (2009). On becoming a leader. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Davidson, Cathy. The New Education?: How to Revolutionize the University to Prepare Students for a World in Flux . Basic Books.

Kim, D. H. (2014). Transformational dialogue for public education: Moving from tweaking to transforming at the state level.?Educational Technology,?54(3), 22-28.

Wheatley, M. J., & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996). A simpler way. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler

Whyte, D. (2001). Crossing the unknown sea: Work as a pilgrimage of identity. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.