Beyond the Blast Radius: Demystifying and Mitigating Cascading Microservice Issues
Andrew Mallaband
Helping Tech Leaders & Innovators To Achieve Exceptional Results
Microservices architectures offer many benefits, but they also introduce new challenges. One such challenge is the cascading effect of simple failures. A seemingly minor issue in one microservice can quickly snowball, impacting other services and ultimately disrupting user experience.
The Domino Effect: From Certificate Expiry to User Frustration
Imagine a scenario where a microservice's certificate expires. This seemingly trivial issue prevents it from communicating with others. This disruption creates a ripple effect:
The Challenge: Untangling the Web of Issues
Cascading failures pose a significant challenge due to the following reasons:
Beyond Certificate Expiry: The Blast Radius of Microservice Issues
Certificate expiry is just one example. Other issues with similar cascading effects include:
Platform Pain Points: When Infrastructure Falters
The impact can extend beyond individual microservices. Platform-level issues can also trigger cascading effects:
Blast Radius and Asynchronous Communication: The Data Lag Challenge
Synchronous communication provides immediate feedback, allowing the sender to know if the message was received successfully. In contrast, asynchronous communication introduces a layer of complexity:
The Root Cause of problems could be because of several factors that result delays or lost messages in asynchronous communication:
Microservice Issues:
Messaging Layer Issues:?
Problems within the messaging layer itself can also cause disruptions:
?
领英推荐
The Cause & Effect Engine: Unveiling the Root of Microservice Disruptions in Real-Time
So what can we do to tame this chaos??
Imagine a system that acts like a detective for your application services. It understands all of the cause-and-effect relationships within your complex architecture. It does this by automatically discovering and analyzing your environment to maintain an up to date picture of services, infrastructure and dependencies and from this computes a dynamic knowledge base of root causes and the effects they will have.?
This knowledge is automatically computed in a Causal Graph that depicts all of the relationships between the potential Root Causes that could occur and the symptoms they may cause. In an environment with thousands of entities it might represent hundreds of thousands of problems and the set of symptoms each one will cause.??
A separate data structure is derived from this called a "Codebook". This table is like a giant symptom checker, mapping all the potential root causes (problems) to the symptoms (errors) they might trigger.?
Hence, each root cause in the Codebook has a unique signature, a vector of m probabilities, that uniquely identifies the root cause. Using the Codebook, the system quickly searches and pinpoints the root causes based on the observed symptoms.
The Causal Graph and Codebook are constantly updated as application services and infrastructure evolve. This ensures the knowledge in the Causal Graph and Codebook stays relevant and adapts to changes.?
These powerful capabilities enable;?
The system represents a significant leap forward in managing cloud native applications. By facilitating real-time root cause analysis and intelligent automation, it empowers teams to proactively address disruptions and ensure the smooth operation of their applications.
The knowledge in the system is not just relevant to optimize the Incident Response process. It is also valuable for performing “what If” analysis to understand what the impact of future changes and planned maintenance will have so that steps can be taken to proactively understand and mitigate the risks of these activities.?
Through its understanding of cause and effect it can also play a role in business continuity planning enabling teams to identify single points of failure in complex services to improve service resilience.??
The system can also be used to streamline the process of Incident post mortems because it contains the prior history of previous Root Cause problems, why they occurred and what the effect was - their Causality -? This avoids the complexity and time involved in reconstructing what happened and enables mitigating steps to be taken to avoid recurrences.?
The Types Of Root Cause Problems & Their Effects?
The system computes its causal knowledge based on Causal Models. These describe the behaviours of how Root Causes problems will propagate symptoms along relationships to dependent entities independently of a given environment. This knowledge is instantiated through service and infrastructure auto discovery to create the Causal Graph and Codebook.???
Examples of these types of Root Cause problems that are modeled in the system include.?
Science Fiction Or Reality?
The inventions behind the system go back to the 90’s, and was at the time and still is groundbreaking. It was successfully deployed, at scale, by some of the largest telcos, system integrators and Fortune 500 companies in the early 2000’s. You can read about the original inventions here.?
Today the problems that these inventions set out address have not changed and the adoption of Cloud Native technologies has only heightened the need for a solution. As real time data has become pervasive in todays application architectures Every Second Of Service Disruption Is A Lost Business Opportunity.
These inventions have been taken and engineered in a modern commercially available platform by Causely to address the challenges of Assuring Continuous Application Reliability in the Cloud Native world. The founding engineering team at Causely were the creators of the tech behind two high growth companies Smarts & Turbonomic.
If you would like to learn more about this don’t hesitate to reach out to me directly or other members of the team at Causely.??????
CRO at Alignable | Growth Strategist | Marketing & Revenue Leader
3 个月The combination of true reactive root cause identification with automated action makes for a powerful story. I have spent years close to this space and know first hand what this could mean for customers desperate for a modern answer to a perennial challenge.
Director @ Sumo Logic | AWS Certified Solutions Architect
3 个月Great insights, Andrew! Two key takeaways for me: The domino effect - even minor issues can lead to significant disruptions which underscores the importance of robust monitoring and management. And advanced root cause analysis using Causal Graphs and Codebooks can significantly improve real-time root cause identification... Thanks for sharing!
Helping Tech Leaders & Innovators To Achieve Exceptional Results
3 个月Some of you may have noticed a comment from John Hayes. John is an experienced DevOps practitioner and runs a Newsletter called Observability 365 which provides market coverage of what’s going on in the world of Observability. Highly recommend signing up if you want to follow what is going on in the space and have not come across him yet. https://observability-360.beehiiv.com/subscribe
Observability | DevOps | SRE
3 个月Thanks Andrew Mallaband This is a really informative exploration of the value of Causal AI in microservice observability. I agree with Barry Howard ??, the discussion of the Codebook was really enlightening.
Chief Architect at Superlative Solutions - Enterprise Architecture with a Focus on leveraging technology to achieve tangible business benefits, experienced in design, implementation and operations
3 个月Interesting stuff Andrew. Having spent many years working with Smarts, I kind of feel there's been a missing part of the puzzle in the way modern cloud -based systems have developed. There seems to be this view that, by calling it "observability", instrumenting and monitoring cloud platforms and applications is a solved problem, when it clearly isn't. I do wonder if RCA went a bit out of fashion when users got burned by some of the more "creative" claims from some of the previous competitors to Smarts. Are there any investment models around this new capability?