Better than beavers

Without systems literacy that addresses the power dynamics embedded in same, people are doomed to be governed by them. Private ordering is already here, so systems literacy is greatly needed. SOLUTION: “Be the change you wish to see in the world” Ghandi. “New #JobOpportunity at the crossroads between #nature and financial #policy developments: UNEP FI is looking for a driven consultant to support nature-positive finance frameworks and measures in selected jurisdictions. The consultant will be working in close collaboration with key external stakeholders and liaising with UNEP's Environmental Policy Unit. Read more and apply by 28 August to join our team: https://ow.ly/lb4X50SWv6H

Thank for sharing

A great view of what we hope might work, but very oddly has also been backfiring, exponentially, with that very dramatic misbehavior also left unexamined, over and over, except by odd folk like Keynes, and a very few other systems scientists also failing to get the simple principle involved across, as very strong evidence of a systemic blind spot. It is not quite analogous, but every way of seeing hides thing too, the spot in the retina where the optic nerve connects, looking at things from the outside hiding the inside, studying things after they’ve formed hiding how they formed, the destabilizing side effects of whatever gives one the most reliable intended effects. There are so many of these it does seem to make “seeing” a matter of blind fabrication. So, the question turns into one of what kinds of fabrication are good and bad. Getting warnings of things developing that allow you to fairly well anticipate what’s coming is where this is headed, how we read or don’t read warnings. A curious handicap of science, from interpreting nature based on data, is seeing only the outsides of things, as the insides mostly don’t broadcast. That’s such an extreme sort of bias, something else must be at work too, broader perspectives.

?? ????? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ????????? ????????? ??? ???? ???????? ????????? ???????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ?????

Thank you, Hans ! Every economist and business leader could read The Theory of Moral Sentiments !